• Title/Summary/Keyword: Counter-current Flow Limit or Flooding

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Counter-Current Flow Limit of a Vertical Two Phase (Water/Air) Flow (상반류(물/공기) 유동한계에 관한 연구)

  • 오율권;조상진;김상녕;이종원
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.308-322
    • /
    • 1991
  • A set of experiments of Counter-Current Flow Limit(CCFL or Flooding) was performed to improve the drawbacks of Wallis' Correlation which neglects the effects of channel size, channel length, injection method and the boundary conditions at the inlet of liquid and gas phase. In these experiments using water and air, the followings were found ; (i) The effects of channel size and length were quite significant. In large tubes(D>20mm), the flooding front occurred at the bottom of the channel and when the gas flow increased the front moved upward ; however, in small tubes(D<20mm), there were no upward movement of flooding front and the flooding just occurred at the liquid inlet. (ii) The effect of water inlet device was not as significant as that of channel length though the inlet boundary conditions could affect the flow development and flooding afterward. (iii) Once the flooding front reached the inlet of water injection device, an newly reduced flow condition was set up and resulted in another flooding corresponding to the new condition.

Counter-Current Flow Limitation Model Based on the Hyperbolic Two-fluid Equations and Interface Shape Function (쌍곡선형 이상유동 방정식과 경계면 모양함수를 이용한 유체기계의 역류유동제한점 예측방법 개발)

  • 정지환
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.1 no.1
    • /
    • pp.15-22
    • /
    • 2000
  • There are lots of industrial machines of which functions are achieved by operation of multi-phase fluids. Some of them take advantage of the characteristics of counter-current two-phase flow The maximum flow rates of gas and liquid phases which flow in opposite-directions (counter-current flow) are limited by a phenomenon known as a Counter-Current Flow Limitation (CCFL or Flooding) The mass and momentum conservation equations for each Phase were established to build a first-order hyperbolic partial derivative equations system. A new CCFL model is developed based on the characteristic equation of the hyperbolic PDE system. The present model has its applicationto the case in which a non-uniform flow is developed around a square or sharp-edged entrance of liquid phase. The model is able to he used to Predict the operating-limit of components in which mass and heat transfer are taking place between liquid and gas phases.

  • PDF

The experimental study on the counter-current flow limit in the flow path with a porous plate (다공판 유로내의 유동한계(CCFL)에 대한 실험적 연구)

  • Lee, Jin-Ki;Yang, Seung-Woo;Kwon, Jung-Tae;Kang, Yong-Tae
    • Proceedings of the SAREK Conference
    • /
    • 2006.06a
    • /
    • pp.176-181
    • /
    • 2006
  • Experiments of Counter-Current Flow Limit(CCFL or Flooding) is performed to improve the drawbacks of Wallis' Correlation which neglects the effects of channel size, channel length, injection method and the boundary conditions at the inlet of liquid and gas phase. In this study, CCFL is observed by changing shape of porous plate using air and water. Results show that as the size of porous increases, CCFL with round shape of the porous plate decreases. In the present study, a CCFL correlation is developed and the CCFL map is proposed based on the present experimental results. developed by this experimental study.

  • PDF

Assessments of FLECHT SEASET Unblocked Forced Reflood Tests Using RELAP5/MOD3 (RELAP5/MOD3 코드를 이용한 FLECHT SEASET의 강제 재관수 실험에 대한 평가)

  • Baek, Joo-Seok;Lee, Won-Jae;Lee, Sang-Yong;Kuh, Jung-Eui
    • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • v.24 no.3
    • /
    • pp.297-310
    • /
    • 1992
  • FLECHT SEASET unblocked forced reflood tests are assessed using Apollo version of RELAP5/MOD3 5M5. The main purpose of the study is to examine the code predictability under forced reflood conditions having different initial power levels and flooding rates. Among various test matrices, the assessment calculations are performed for the test numbers 31701 31302, 31203, 31805, 34524, 31021, 34006 and 35807 These have been selected because they have similar initial conditions but different initial peak rod powers or flooding rates. In addition, various sensitivity calculations are performed for test number 31203 on the improved models of RELAP5/MOD3. Those are for the effect of Counter Current Flow Limit (CCFL) option at the outlet junction of the test section, for the effect of grid modelling on the interfacial drag calculations as well as on the heat structure calculations, and for the effect of nodalization and the time step size. The results of sensitivity studies show that the improved models of RELAP5/MOD3 enhance the code predictability. The assessment results show that the RELAP5/MOD3 has a tendency to underpredict the turn around temperature and the turn around time. But RELAP5/MOD3 silghtly overpredicts the turn around temperature for high flooding rate. The results also show that the calculated quenching by RELAP5/MOD3 is delayed with the increase of the rod power or the decrease of the flooding rate.

  • PDF