• 제목/요약/키워드: Conventional lead apron

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.02초

임산부 흉부 촬영중 사용할 새로 디자인된 납치마의 효율성 평가 (Evaluation of Effectiveness of New Design Lead Apron during Pregnant X-ray Chest P-A)

  • 김형균;권순무;정홍문
    • 한국방사선학회논문지
    • /
    • 제6권6호
    • /
    • pp.441-445
    • /
    • 2012
  • 다양한 질환이 발생 될 수 있는 임신중에 산모의 건강상태를 검사하기 위해서는 임산부의 X-ray 흉부촬영이 필수적으로 이루어지게 된다. 따라서 임산부의 X-ray 흉부촬영에 관한 의료용 방사선의 사용은 기본적인 검사로 사용되어지고 있다. 따라서 임신초기인 착상기 부터 태아의 각종 장기 형성 및 기관 형성기까지 대부분의 임신기간은 방사선의 직접적인 차폐가 요구되어진다. 하지만 현재 사용되고 있는 납치마는 임산부가 직접 손으로 잡고 있고 는 불편함으로 인한 산모의 정확한 X-ray 흉부촬영 자세가 이루어지지 않고 있는 실정이다 또한 이러한 결과로 인해 산모의 X-ray 흉부촬영 영상이 폐첨부와 견갑골이 자주 겹쳐 흉부영상이 질적으로 저하되는 현상을 가져다 주고 있다. 이러한 문제점을 극복하기 위해 산모용 납치마를 제작하였다. 결과적으로 새로 디자인한 산모용 납치마는 산모의 X-ray흉부 촬영시 편한 자세를 유지 할 수 있게 해주었다. 아울러 산모가 정확한 자세를 취 할 수 있게 되었다. 더 나아가서 산모의 X-ray흉부 촬영시 견갑골과 폐첨부가 겹치는 현상을 최소화 해주어서 산모의 흉부촬영 영상에 최적화된 이미지를 제공 할 수 있게 해 주었다.

결합제 분사 방식 3D 프린팅 기술을 활용한 소아 생식기 차폐체 제작 및 유용성 평가 (Production and Utility Assessment of Pediatric Genital Shields Using 3D Printing Technology with Colorjet 3D Printing)

  • 이인자;홍다영
    • 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
    • /
    • 제46권6호
    • /
    • pp.543-551
    • /
    • 2023
  • In this study, the aim was to assess the shielding performance of different 3D printing materials, specifically those produced using FDM, SLA, and CJP methods, with a focus on their application as shielding devices in clinical settings. Additionally, the weight of lead shielding materials can evoke reluctance in pediatric patients undergoing X-ray imaging. A total of 12 materials were printed using their respective 3D printers. These materials were then subjected to X-ray testing using diagnostic X-ray equipment and an exposure meter. The goal was to evaluate their shielding capabilities in comparison to 1 mm lead. The results of this evaluation revealed that VisiJet PXL-Pastel, produced using the CJP method, exhibited the highest shielding performance. Therefore, VisiJet PXL-Pastel by CJP method was selected for the creation of a shielding device designed for pediatric reproductive organs. Subsequent tests demonstrated that both the newly created shielding device and conventional lead shielding equipment achieved the same maximum shielding rate at 50 kVp. Specifically, the shielding rate for the 3D printed device was measured at 84.53%, while the conventional lead shielding equipment, categorized as Apron1 (85.74%), Apron2 (99.98%), and Apron3 (99.04%), demonstrated similar performance. In conclusion, the CJP-produced VisiJet PXL-Pastel material showcased excellent radiation shielding capabilities, allowing for anatomical observations of the target organs and their surrounding structures in X-ray images. Furthermore, its lower weight in comparison to traditional lead shielding materials makes it a clinically practical and useful choice, particularly for pediatric applications.

A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes

  • Cho, Jae-Hun;Kim, Jae-Yun;Kang, Joo-Eun;Park, Pyong-Eun;Kim, Jae-Hun;Lim, Jeong-Ae;Kim, Hae-Kyoung;Woo, Nam-Sik
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • 제24권4호
    • /
    • pp.199-204
    • /
    • 2011
  • Background: Although many clinicians know about the reducing effects of the pulsed and low-dose modes for fluoroscopic radiation when performing interventional procedures, few studies have quantified the reduction of radiation-absorbed doses (RADs). The aim of this study is to compare how much the RADs from a fluoroscopy are reduced according to the C-arm fluoroscopic modes used. Methods: We measured the RADs in the C-arm fluoroscopic modes including 'conventional mode', 'pulsed mode', 'low-dose mode', and 'pulsed + low-dose mode'. Clinical imaging conditions were simulated using a lead apron instead of a patient. According to each mode, one experimenter radiographed the lead apron, which was on the table, consecutively 5 times on the AP views. We regarded this as one set and a total of 10 sets were done according to each mode. Cumulative exposure time, RADs, peak X-ray energy, and current, which were viewed on the monitor, were recorded. Results: Pulsed, low-dose, and pulsed + low-dose modes showed significantly decreased RADs by 32%, 57%, and 83% compared to the conventional mode. The mean cumulative exposure time was significantly lower in the pulsed and pulsed + low-dose modes than in the conventional mode. All modes had pretty much the same peak X-ray energy. The mean current was significantly lower in the low-dose and pulsed + low-dose modes than in the conventional mode. Conclusions: The use of the pulsed and low-dose modes together significantly reduced the RADs compared to the conventional mode. Therefore, the proper use of the fluoroscopy and its C-arm modes will reduce the radiation exposure of patients and clinicians.

A New Radiation-Shielding Device for Restraining Veterinary Patients

  • Songyi Kim;Minju Lee;Miju Oh;Yooyoung Lee;Jiyoung Ban;Jiwoon Park;Sojin Kim;Uhjin Kim;Jaepung Han;Dongwoo Chang
    • 한국임상수의학회지
    • /
    • 제40권6호
    • /
    • pp.429-437
    • /
    • 2023
  • In veterinary medicine, most radiographic images are obtained by restraining patients, inevitably exposing the restrainer to secondary scattered radiation. Radiation exposure can result in stochastic reactions such as cancer and genetic effects, as well as deterministic reactions such as skin burns, cataracts, and bone marrow suppression. Radiation-shielding equipment, including aprons, thyroid shields, eyewear, and gloves, can reduce radiation exposure. However, the risk of radiation exposure to the upper arms, face, and back remains, and lead aprons and thyroid shields are heavy, restricting movement. We designed a new radiation-shielding system and compared its shielding ability with those of conventional radiation-shielding systems. We hypothesized that the new shielding system would have a wider radiation-shielding range and similar shielding ability. The radiation exposure dose differed significantly between the conventional and new shielding systems in the forehead, chin, and bilateral upper arm areas (p < 0.001). When both systems were used together, the radiation-shielding ability was better than when only one system was used at all anatomical locations (p < 0.01). This study suggests that the new radiation-shielding system is essential and convenient for veterinary radiation workers because it is a step closer to radiation safety in veterinary radiography.