• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.59-68
• /
• 2005

시대변화에 따라 제품에 대한 소비자의 구매 결정기준과 제품 공급방법은 끊임없는 변화가 거듭되었다. 디지털기술을 응용한 on-line 시스템이 상품에 대한 정보를 전달하고 생산과 구매가 동시적으로 일어나는 시장체제가 형성하게 되었다. 그 결과 소비자 중심의 브랜드 구축이 중요한 과제가 되고 있다. 따라서 실증조사를 통하여 경제 사회 환경 변화에 따른 소비자의 의식구조를 파악하고, 이 변화에 따른 소비자의 구매결정 기준을 이해하고자 한다. 소비자의 구매태도를 만족, 선호, 재구입, 추천으로 기준을 설정하고, 이들 4개의 기준에 미칠 수 있는 브랜드 이미지의 요인들의 영향을 파악하였다. 브랜드 이미지의 효율적 형성을 위하여서 생성되는 소비자(고객) 중심의 브랜드 가치는 실증분석을 통하여 얻어진 결과를 보면 사회생활가치, 정서가치, 개성적가치 수용하여 브랜드이미지에 적용하는 것이 효과적인 것으로 나타났다. 연구결과에서 도출된 브랜드 이미지의 공통적 요인으로는 차별성가 고객 중심의 일관성 및 개성적, 감성적 요인들을 부각 시를 수 있는 행태로 브랜드 이미지화를 도모할 필요가 있다는 결과가 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구는 미래 지향적이고, 소비자에게 인지 연상되는 기능을 보다 효과적으로 증대시킬 수 있도록 고객 중심의 브랜드 창출을 위한 가이드라인을 제시하였다.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.81-91
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 조경공사 하자판례를 조사하여 하자소송의 일반적 분석, 공종별 판결 결과, 하자유형별 판결결과를 분석하고 하자분쟁을 완화하기 위한 조경공사 하자처리 개선방안을 제안하는 것이다. 본 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 2000년대 들어 조경공사와 관련된 하자소송이 증가하고 있으며, 소송 기간은 1심의 경우 603일, 2심의 경우는 550일로 나타나 사용자와 시공자 모두에게 심각한 시간적 경제적 손실을 초래하고 있다. 2. 감정금액 대비 인용금액이 1심의 경우 52.0%, 2심의 경우 57.3%, 전체적으로는 53.6% 수준으로 감정금액이 과다하게 책정되는 경향이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 3. 공종별 하자판결 결과는 조경수목식재가 전체 하자 발생 공종의 75%에 달하여 주요한 쟁점으로 나타났으며, 사용자인 원고의 승소율이 77%에 달하여 시공자들의 하자이행에 심각한 부담으로 나타났다. 4. 하자유형별 판결 결과에서는 사용자의 유지관리 부실로 인한 하자가 28%를 차지하고 시공자인 피고의 승소율이 64%로 높게 나타나 사용자의 유지관리 책임이 중요하게 부각되었다. 이러한 문제를 개선하기 위해서는 하자를 줄일 수 있도록 정확한 시공을 하고, 적절한 유지관리를 시행하도록 해야 하며, 부적기 식재 및 천재지변에 의한 피해 등 하자면책규정, 공종별 하자판정기준, 하자이행절차 등을 포함하는 조경공사 하자판정 및 처리기준을 마련해야 한다.

• 한국수산과학회지
• /
• 제54권6호
• /
• pp.869-879
• /
• 2021

Methods for the development of home meal replacement seafood tailored to consumer needs for the advanced use of Broughton's ribbed ark Scapharca broughtonii (BRA) in Korea are required. In this study, we developed a cheese-topped, semi-dried, and seasoned Broughton's ribbed ark (S-BRA) tailored for the younger generation with an improved texture and fish odor. The optimization of conditions to improve the texture and fish odor was performed using RSM. The design of the model was appropriate because there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the predicted and actual values of moisture content, hardness, and overall acceptance, and the optimal preparation conditions were a vinegar content of 2.68%, a soaking time of 62 min, a drying temperature of 60℃, and a time of 162 min. The S-BRA manufactured under these optimal conditions exhibited a lower odor intensity compared to the unsoaked and undried control, suggesting that the fish odor of S-BRA has been improved. The moisture content related to the texture of the S-BRA was lower than that of the control, and the hardness was higher. Therefore, the S-BRA developed in this study will appeal to people of all ages, especially the younger generation; their consumption is expected to increase.

• 서비스연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.24-40
• /
• 2023

최근의 소비자들은 기업이 우리 사회가 직면한 문제들과 맞서 싸우며 사회 변화를 위하여 관심을 가지고 행동하기를 기대한다. 이에 본 연구는 우리 사회의 주요 이슈와 관련된 사회적 목소리를 담은 네이티브 광고에 대한 효과를 규명하고자 하였다. 특히 본 연구는 사회적 목소리를 담은 네이티브 광고의 주체와 개인 특성인 윤리적 소비 성향에 따라 그 효과가 어떻게 나타나는지에 대하여 주목하였다. 그리고 소비자는 기업이 후원한 네이티브 광고보다 기업이 직접 제작한 네이티브 광고에 대해 부정적 기업 태도를 보일 것이며, 소비자의 윤리적 소비 성향에 따라 이러한 효과가 달라질 것이라는 가설을 제안하였다. 일련의 가설을 검정하기 위하여 직장인들을 대상으로 온라인 실험을 진행하였다. 연구 결과에 따르면, 사회적 목소리를 담은 네이티브 광고에 있어서 주체를 기업이 직접 제작이라고 표기했을 때와 기업이 후원하였다고 표기하였을 시 소비자의 기업 태도는 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 그러나 소비자의 개인 특성인 윤리적 소비 성향에 따른 유의한 차이를 발견할 수 있었는데 윤리적 소비 성향이 높은 소비자의 경우 사회적 목소리를 담은 네이티브 광고의 주체로 기업이 제작하였다는 표기보다는 기업이 후원하였다고 표기한 경우 기업 태도가 높게 나타났다. 이와 같은 연구의 결과는 광고 표기의 명료성에 관한 관심이 높아지는 현시점에서 네이티브 광고의 주체 및 표기에 대한 효과를 밝히고 이러한 효과에 영향을 미치는 개인 특성 변인을 규명하였다는 점에서 연구의 함의를 찾을 수 있다. 또한, 실무적으로 기업이 사회적 목소리를 담은 네이티브 광고를 집행할 시에 윤리적 소비 성향이 높은 소비자들의 기업 태도를 높이기 위해서 광고 주체 및 표기를 더 세심하게 재고해야 할 필요성이 있음을 시사해준다.

• 마케팅과학연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.59-69
• /
• 2010

绿色环保或者环境意识已经成为商业、政府机关, 以及消费者和世界关注的重要问题. 针对这一情况, 韩国政府宣布, 在本世纪初, "环保建设" 将被作为一种用以鼓励与环保相关的商业活动的方式. 不同层次的韩国服装业, 提出了不同的产品环保的绿色计划. 这些服装产品包括有机产品和回收的衣服. 要想使这些公司成功, 他们需要那些, 在做产品购买,使用, 处置时, 将绿色问题(如环境的可持续性发展)作为一个人判断的一个组成部分的顾客的信息. 这些消费者可以被看成是生态学的关注者. 过去的研究已经对消费者对于环保产品的购买意愿进行了检测. 此外, 还研究了影响生态保护者或绿色消费者的因素. 但是, 只是关注生态保护者在处置或者回收利用衣服上与采购绿色产品相比较是不够的. 服装处置行为有多种途径, 消费者可以用淘汰, 传承(例如: 把它送给一个年幼的弟弟), 赠与, 交换, 出售或者简单的把他扔掉等多种方式来暂时或者永久的摆脱闲置的衣服或贷款项目. 因此, 购买环保产品的行为应该结合服装处置的行为, 从而进一步了解消费者的消费行为与对环境的态度. 本项研究的目的在于提供韩国生态保护者从有利于生态学的角度出发来购买和处理衣服的生活方式的相关信息. 本研究的目标有: 1, 基于韩国对服装处置行为进行分类; 2, 调查人 们人口统计数据, 生活方式和服装消费价值观赏的差异; 3, 在环保的时尚物品的购买意愿和影响因素之间进行比较. 自填式的调查问卷是基于以往的研究设置出来的. 问卷包括10项处置衣服的条款, 22项可持续并且健康的生活方式的条款, 以及19项消费观念的条款. 根据利克特模板的五分量表设置. 此外, 购买两个时尚物品的意愿和每个物品属性的11项特征都是根据利克特模板的七分量表而来, 两种制成羊毛套衫的可以从PET识别代码的回收瓶子中创造出来的涤纶织物这两种套衫选自一个韩国和一个美国的户外运动服装的品牌. 我们对每一种产品的简介和颜色都进行了调查, 人口统计学(即性别, 年龄, 婚姻状况, 教育程度, 收入, 职业)也被包括在内. 在2009年5月份, 研究数据通过一个专业网站的调查机构进行采集, 最后有600份调查问卷可供分析, 这个调查的受访者年龄从20到49岁不等, 平均年龄为34岁. 百分之50的调查者为男性, 大约58%的受访者是已婚者, 其中62%的受访者有大学学位. 主要成分分析和因素最大方法差的方法用以识别衣服处理规模的潜在尺度. 共有三个因素生成(比如: 倒卖行为, 捐赠行为, 不回收利用行为). 基于他们处置衣服的方式对受访者进行了分类, 群类分析被使用, 最终得到了三个部分. 不同的消费者, 被分别贴上 "转售集团", "捐资团体" 以及 "不回收组织" 的标签加以分类, 其中98%是正确的分类. 从人口统计学角度来看, 这三个类别的人在性别, 婚姻状况, 职业和年龄上有显著的差异. 健康可持续的生活方式被缩减为以下5个因素: 自我满意度, 家庭定位, 健康问题, 环境问题和自愿的服务. 这是三个群体中健康可持续的生活方式的最显著的差异. 转售集团和捐赠组表现出在健康可持续的生活方式上的相同倾向, 同时, 不回收集团在生活方式方面呈现最低的平均值. 转售和捐赠团体自称享受和满意这种生活和消费方式, 并且能够利用空余的时间陪伴家人. 另外, 这两组的人关心健康和有机食品, 并试图保护能源和资源. 对服装消费的价值观产生主要影响的三个因素是: 个人价值, 社会价值和实用价值. 因素的方差测试表明转售集团和其他两组之间的因素差异最大. 转售集团相比其他价值更关注个人价值和社会价值. 相比之下, 非回收集团比捐赠集团更关注高层次的社会价值. 比较购买环保产品的意愿上, 转售集团表现出最高的购买A类产品的意愿. 另一方面, 捐赠集团则在小市场中表现出购买B类产品的最高意愿. 此外, 平均分数表明, 购买韩国的产品(B类产品)相比购买美国的产品(A类产品)更合韩国人的心意. 多元线性回归分析法确定了对环保产品的购买的意愿对制造业产品属性的影响. 产品的设计, 价格, 贡献, 对环境的保护, 价格, 兼容性是影响转售集团的显著因素, 另外, 以及对自身形象的影响是捐赠团体的重要因素. 对于非回收集团来说, 设计, 价格等因素是相同的, 自我的形象,对环保运动的贡献, 和环境保护也是很重要的. 而价格因素具有显著性的共通性. 对于B类产品来说, 设计, 合理的价格, 形象等因素是同等的重要, 但是不同的组对购买的特征和意愿有不同的倾向. 健康可持续的生活方式以及服装消费的意向对购买A类产品和B类产品的影响同样被我们所关注. 实际操作者的健康状况和个人价值都是影响购买意愿的重要因素; 然而, 在这三个群体中说服的力度都很低. 结果表明, 分类出来的每组处理服装的行为, 显示着不同服装产品的属性, 个人价值, 和实践者的特点, 这些都影响了他们的购买环保产品的意愿, 结果会使生态保护者提出并组织更合理的生态设计的战略决策.

• 마케팅과학연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.68-79
• /
• 2009

The interplay between hedonic and utilitarian attributes has assumed special significance in recent years; it has been proposed that consumption offerings should be viewed as experiences that stimulate both cognitions and feelings rather than as mere products or services. This research builds on previous work on hedonic versus utilitarian benefits, regulatory focus theory, customer satisfaction to address two question: (1) Is the shopping goal at the point of purchase different from the shopping value? and (2) Is the customer loyalty after the use different from the shopping value and shopping goal? We surveyed 345 peoples those who have bought the electronic-goods within 6 months. This research dealt with the shopping value which is consisted of 2 types, hedonic and utilitarian. Those who pursue the hedonic shopping value may prefer the pleasure of purchasing experience to the product itself. They tend to prefer atmosphere, arousal of the shopping experience. Consistent with previous research, we use the term "hedonic" to refer to their aesthetic, experiential and enjoyment-related value. On the contrary, Those who pursue the utilitarian shopping value may prefer the reasonable buying. It may be more functional. Consistent with previous research, we use the term "utilitarian" to refer to the functional, instrumental, and practical value of consumption offerings. Holbrook(1999) notes that consumer value is an experience that results from the consumption of such benefits. In the context of cell phones for example, the phone's battery life and sound volume are utilitarian benefits, whereas aesthetic appeal from its shape and color are hedonic benefits. Likewise, in the case of a car, fuel economics and safety are utilitarian benefits whereas the sunroof and the luxurious interior are hedonic benefits. The shopping goals are consisted of the promotion focus goal and the prevention focus goal, based on the self-regulatory focus theory. The promotion focus is characterized into focusing ideal self because they are oriented to wishes and vision. The promotion focused individuals are tend to be more risk taking. They are more sensitive to hope and achievement. On the contrary, the prevention focused individuals are characterized into focusing the responsibilities because they are oriented to safety. The prevention focused individuals are tend to be more risk avoiding. We wanted to test the relation among the shopping value, shopping goal and customer loyalty. Customers show the positive or negative feelings comparing with the expectation level which customers have at the point of the purchase. If the result were bigger than the expectation, customers may feel positive feeling such as delight or satisfaction and they would want to share their feelings with other people. And they want to buy those products again in the future time. There is converging evidence that the types of goals consumers expect to be fulfilled by the utilitarian dimension of a product are different from those they seek from the hedonic dimension (Chernev 2004). Specifically, whereas consumers expect the fulfillment of product prevention goals on the utilitarian dimension, they expect the fulfillment of promotion goals on the hedonic dimension (Chernev 2004; Chitturi, Raghunathan, and Majahan 2007; Higgins 1997, 2001) According to the regulatory focus theory, prevention goals are those that ought to be met. Fulfillment of prevention goals in the context of product consumption eliminates or significantly reduces the probability of a painful experience, thus making consumers experience emotions that result from fulfillment of prevention goals such as confidence and securities. On the contrary, fulfillment of promotion goals are those that a person aspires to meet, such as "looking cool" or "being sophisticated." Fulfillment of promotion goals in the context of product consumption significantly increases the probability of a pleasurable experience, thus enabling consumers to experience emotions that result from the fulfillment of promotion goals. The proposed conceptual framework captures that the relationships among hedonic versus utilitarian shopping values and promotion versus prevention shopping goals respectively. An analysis of the consequence of the fulfillment and frustration of utilitarian and hedonic value is theoretically worthwhile. It is also substantively relevant because it helps predict post-consumption behavior such as the promotion versus prevention shopping goals orientation. Because our primary goal is to understand how the post consumption feelings influence the variable customer loyalty: word of mouth (Jacoby and Chestnut 1978). This research result is that the utilitarian shopping value gives the positive influence to both of the promotion and prevention goal. However the influence to the prevention goal is stronger. On the contrary, hedonic shopping value gives influence to the promotion focus goal only. Additionally, both of the promotion and prevention goal show the positive relation with customer loyalty. However, the positive relation with promotion goal and customer loyalty is much stronger. The promotion focus goal gives the influence to the customer loyalty. On the contrary, the prevention focus goal relates at the low level of relation with customer loyalty than that of the promotion goal. It could be explained that it is apt to get framed the compliment of people into 'gain-non gain' situation. As the result, for those who have the promotion focus are motivated to deliver their own feeling to other people eagerly. Conversely the prevention focused individual are more sensitive to the 'loss-non loss' situation. The research result is consistent with pre-existent researches. There is a conceptual parallel between necessities-needs-utilitarian benefits and luxuries-wants-hedonic benefits (Chernev 2004; Chitturi, Raghunathan and Majaha 2007; Higginns 1997; Kivetz and Simonson 2002b). In addition, Maslow's hierarchy of needs and the precedence principle contends luxuries-wants-hedonic benefits higher than necessities-needs-utilitarian benefits. Chitturi, Raghunathan and Majaha (2007) show that consumers are focused more on the utilitarian benefits than on the hedonic benefits of a product until their minimum expectation of fulfilling prevention goals are met. Furthermore, a utilitarian benefit is a promise of a certain level of functionality by the manufacturer or the retailer. When the promise is not fulfilled, customers blame the retailer and/or the manufacturer. When negative feelings are attributable to an entity, customers feel angry. However in the case of hedonic benefit, the customer, not the manufacturer, determines at the time of purchase whether the product is stylish and attractive. Under such circumstances, customers are more likely to blame themselves than the manufacturer if their friends do not find the product stylish and attractive. Therefore, not meeting minimum utilitarian expectations of functionality generates a much more intense negative feelings, such as anger than a less intense feeling such as disappointment or dissatisfactions. The additional multi group analysis of this research shows the same result. Those who are unsatisfactory customers who have the prevention focused goal shows higher relation with WOM, comparing with satisfactory customers. The research findings in this article could have significant implication for the personal selling fields to increase the effectiveness and the efficiency of the sales such that they can develop the sales presentation strategy for the customers. For those who are the hedonic customers may be apt to show more interest to the promotion goal. Therefore it may work to strengthen the design, style or new technology of the products to the hedonic customers. On the contrary for the utilitarian customers, it may work to strengthen the price competitiveness. On the basis of the result from our studies, we demonstrated a correspondence among hedonic versus utilitarian and promotion versus prevention goal, WOM. Similarly, we also found evidence of the moderator effects of satisfaction after use, between the prevention goal and WOM. Even though the prevention goal has the low level of relation to WOM, those who are not satisfied show higher relation to WOM. The relation between the prevention goal and WOM is significantly different according to the satisfaction versus unsatisfaction. In addition, improving the promotion emotions of cheerfulness and excitement and the prevention emotion of confidence and security will further improve customer loyalty. A related potential further research could be to examine whether hedonic versus utilitarian, promotion versus prevention goals improve customer loyalty for services as well. Under the budget and time constraints, designers and managers are often compelling to choose among various attributes. If there is no budget or time constraints, perhaps the best solution is to maximize both hedonic and utilitarian dimension of benefits. However, they have to make trad-off process between various attributes. For the designers and managers have to keep in mind that without hedonic benefit satisfaction of the product it may hard to lead the customers to the customer loyalty.