• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권8호
• /
• pp.661-670
• /
• 2016

건설공사 사후평가는 공공건설사업을 대상으로 수요 공사비 공사기간 기대효과 및 사업관리 내용 등을 준공 이후에 재평가하고, 차후 유사사업 추진 시 그 평가결과를 참고하여 발주청의 시행착오를 줄이기 위한 목적으로 2000년부터 도입되었다. 하지만 용역대가 산정기준이 마련되지 않아 사후평가 용역의 질적 저하 및 분쟁발생의 원인이 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 사후평가 용역데이터를 기반으로 공사비요율방식 및 실비정액가산방식의 용역대가 산정기준을 제시하였다. 용역대가 분석을 위해 기존의 사후평가 용역비와 공사비를 조사하고 공사비요율방식 및 실비정액가산방식을 통해 산출된 용역비를 비교분석하였다. 분석결과 실비정액가산방식을 통해 산출한 용역비가 공사비요율방식에 비해 더 정확함을 확인하였다. 실비 정액가산방식은 시설물별 사업특성을 반영할 수 있도록 거리보정계수, 면적보정계수, 통합보정계수 등 다양한 보정계수가 적용되었으며, 선형공사(도로, 철도), 비선형공사 I(주택 산업단지), 비선형공사 II(공항, 항만, 댐, 상하수도), 기타공사로 시설물 구분을 세분화하여 산정기준을 제시하였다.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.90-100
• /
• 2013

Deck-plates are widely used on construction sites, and have the advantage of enabling contractors to achieve a relatively uniform quality. But nevertheless, quality deviation in deck-plate construction can occur as the result of differences in site conditions and the experience of crew workers. In this study, the authors present a site quality evaluation prototype for building deck-plate construction. Through analyses of case studies and interviews with experts, standard quality check sheets and a quality management index were developed by estimating the importance of quality check items based on a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method. The applicability and effectiveness of the prototype was evaluated through a case study and interviews with case participants. It was found that the prototype promoted an active quality management as a way of continuously improving quality management in deck-plate construction instead of passive quality inspection practice.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.1528-1533
• /
• 2009

Infrastructure is provided to the user through long-term project period and large-scale working expenses. Existing facilities are getting old as time goes by. Accordingly, proper maintenance is required and generally more maintenance cost than initial invested cost is needed during life cycle. Therefore, a specific plan that just increases the value of facilities is required by evaluating performance of facilities and inputting minimum maintenance cost. Value engineering that increases the value of object by systemically analyzing Life Cycle Costs and function is actively promoted at the design phase of construction. These efforts can increase the performance of facilities at the maintenance phase of infrastructure. This study is to search how to evaluate the performance of Roadway by utilizing function analysis, as a core part of VE in the maintenance phase. In order to this a new evaluation criteria were proposed by adding an evaluation items to the existing criteria through the research of old documents, status of roadway maintenance and function analysis of VE. The results of this study may promote the effective performance evaluation to determine a resolution of roadway congestion in future. A succeeding study using the proposed evaluation criteria will be required.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2018년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.341-342
• /
• 2018

Waterproofing materials and construction methods have been developed and applied to various construction sites since the past. However, there many cases where the waterproofing performance is not satisfactory, leading to continuous water leakage. It has been observed that a key reason for this is because waterproofing method and material selection is not optimized in terms of the appropriate application area and environmental degradation factors. This paper proposes that future selection of waterproofing methods should consider the following evaluation criteria; 1) waterproof performance evaluation according to site conditions, 2) evaluation of construction method, 3) manufacturing and maintenance of waterproofing systems.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.191-193
• /
• 2011

The government has performed various countermeasures and policies for the efficiency of Construction Industry. However the analysis of the policy performance is not satisfied. In the study we benchmarked the construction performance evaluation system and indicators which was performed by advanced countries like the United States and the United Kingdom. So we suggested indicators for measuring performance of public construction cost saving strategy performed in 2008 by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. This paper will provide the basis for establishing future construction policies or plans.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.40-45
• /
• 2017

Among various methods to build the construction safety, the consecutive improvement by the measuring and evaluating safety management capabilities for the construction participants such as an owner, a contractor, and a supervisor (construction project manager) can be the effective one. Thus, an effective evaluation and grading criteria to provide performance index for the implementation of safety management activities should be necessary. In this regards, the purpose of this study is to verify the adequacy by offering a competency evaluation system for the supervisor's safety capability and by applying the system to some construction sites. The proposed evaluation system was developed on the basis of the principles of safety management & accident prevention, basic elements of safety and health management system, and safety evaluation cases at home and abroad. The trial evaluation showed that the safety management of the construction site is mainly carried out by the contractor and the supervisor's awareness for the safety management is low on the whole. Especially, it is urgent to improve the support system from the supervisor headquarter and to place the dedicated safety management person in the field.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.11-23
• /
• 2005

It is difficult to put it into practice in that it requires bearing too much burden to draw out the planning itself in a case of large construction work. Consequently in this paper we select evaluation criteria by construction progress, classify into several categories, and regard potential danger which often occurs, as a evaluation criterion. Further step is to allow workers or collaborated companies to express their expert opinions or experiences and to encourage quality and process control and autonomous safety control by applying PSM(Process Safety Management) method using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and to development of PSIM(Process Safety Information Management) evaluation method in the construction. The reason why PSIM method should be quantitative and substantial progress is because it contributes Korean constructing companies to enhancing their safety control ability and to taking an equal stance just like developed countries, thereby strengthening their competitive edges.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2015년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.213-214
• /
• 2015

The first successful case of a CM application in Shanghai, China in 1993 presented its possibility. According to the State Council's 'Investment system reformation', in 2004, more than 40 sub-provincial divisions in China were increased the productivity of construction by the CM application. It is predicted that CM will be utilized as a technical management method at government's plan, which raises the urbanization level more than 60% through the construction industry by 2020. However, compared with increasing CM demands, there are no complete evaluation criteria of CM in china. For instance, 26 areas in china arrange criteria individually, so. Therefore, it is necessary to establish integrated evaluation criteria on the basis of regional ones. This research will draw the evaluation criteria of selecting for the China CM Corporation in order to vitalize CM system.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2002년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.363-366
• /
• 2002

현행 건설신기술지정제도의 평가는 신규성, 진보성 및 현장적용성의 일률적인 평가기준이 적용되고 정량적 평가가 쉽지 않아, 객관성과 공정성확보에 어려움이 있다. 따라서, 본 논문에서는 건설신기술 지정제도의 실태 및 문제점을 파악하기 위해서 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문조사 결과 건설신기술의 기술분야별 특성을 반영할 수 있는 구체적인 평가 기준 및 평가방법의 정량화가 필요함을 알 수 있었다. 또한, 신기술 평가의 정량화 방안으로 판별함수식을 이용한 평가 모델을 제시하였다. 평가기관 전문가의 브레인스토밍을 통하여 평가항목변수를 선정하고, t-검정을 실시하여 모델구축의 최종변수를 선정하였으며, 판별분석을 실시하여 판별함수를 도출하였다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.80-88
• /
• 2010

정부에서는 건설산업의 발전을 위해 다양한 기술정책을 추진하고 있다. 그러나 정책 추진의 정확한 목표나 성과 분석은 상대적으로 미흡한 편이다. 기존의 정책 성과분석은 추진과정의 투입물에 대한 분석만을 수행하였다. 이에 본 연구는 국토해양부에서 2003년부터 2007년까지 5년간 추진한 '제3차 건설기술진흥기본계획'의 성과분석을 실시하였다. 이를 통해 계획 당시 수립한 정량적인 목표 달성여부를 분석하였으며, 정책추진 부서와 건설전문가를 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하여 정성적 인 성과도 분석하였다. 그 결과 계획 당시 명확한 정책 목표와 성과평가 방법론이 수립되지 않으면 성과분석이 어렵다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 본 논문의 결과는 추후 건설 기술정책 수립과정의 기초로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.