• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.81-96
• /
• 2017

Objective: The purpose of this study is to present a detailed view of the self-regulation of 5-year-old children based on parental attitudes and consistency. Methods: The research was conducted among 144 pairs of parents (288 people) of 5-year-old children residing in Seoul. Results: The resultsare as follows. First, with regards to self-regulation based on a child'sgenderand mother's parental attitudes, sub-factors such as parental attitudes and parental interaction were found to have significant effects on self-determination. Also,parental attitudes and parental interaction were found to have significant effects on the sub-factors of self-monitoring, such as self-evaluation and self-determination and the sub-factors of self-regulation, such as behavioral inhibition and emotionality. Second, the percentage of parents whose parental attitude was consistent at 58.3%, which is higher than the percentage of parents whose parenting attitude was inconsistent at 41.7%. The results of self-regulation were significantly higher when parental attitudes were consistent than when they were inconsistent. Conclusion/Implications: This research is significant in that it offered a concrete view of parental attitudes and consistency status that affect child's self-regulation.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.353-363
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 지각된 부 모의 양육태도 유형, 부모 간 양육태도의 일치 여부 및 유형에 따라 청소년의 학교생활 적응에 차이가 있는지 알아보는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 중고생 586명(여학생 306명)을 대상으로, 이들이 지각한 부 모의 양육태도 유형과 학교생활 적응 수준을 조사하였으며, 다변량 분산분석(MANOVA)을 통해 차이검증을 하였다. 연구결과, 부 모의 양육태도 유형에 따라 청소년의 학교생활적응 수준에는 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 애정-자율 일치 집단 부모의 자녀가 다른 경우(애정-통제일치, 적대-자율일치, 적대-통제일치, 불일치)에 비해, 학교생활 적응 수준이 유의미하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 적대-통제 일치 집단 부모의 자녀는 불일치 집단 부모의 자녀보다도 학교생활 적응 수준이 낮은 것으로 확인되었다. 이를 바탕으로 부모 양육태도의 중요성과 영향력을 논의하였으며, 부모 양육태도와 자녀의 적응에 대한 후속연구의 방향을 제안하였다.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.15-34
• /
• 2004

This study is an attempt to develop the 'Parental Intelligence Scale', which can be applied in the parent education and counselling and provide more useful information for more appropriate interventions by evaluating the characteristics of parent's roles and strong/weak points of the parent's roles under the special situation and environments. In developing the scales, this study reviews of numbers of existing literatures, analysis of scales and tools on parent's role or attitude, collection of episodes on parent's role, validity check processes by field experts, and 2 rounds of factor analysis. The outcomes of the study are as follows; In regard of the development of Parental Intelligence Scale, 3 factors of care-giving role, management role, nurturing role were derived from the conceptual and measurement model. From these 3 factors, 8 sub-factors of empathy, encourage, enhancement, rational authoritativeness, flexibility, rejection, acceptance, control were constructed. 39 question items were derived in order to measure these sub-factors. Especially through the two rounds of factor analysis, the question items with enhanced internal consistency were derived and total cumulative variance was increased, which made theoretical model into the generalized model possible.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.219-232
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this research is to develop and validate an instrument that can be used to measure critical aspects of a parent's attitude and behavior that influence child development and adaptation. This instrument is named Parenting Style Inventory and self-reporting assessment of parent for preschoolers. We reported findings from 578 preschooler's care-givers. Five factors were extracted from 55 items developed for preschooler version and finally 29 items were selected. Subscales were empathy, respect, parental authority, coerciveness, perfectionism. Internal consistency of these subscales were .77, .86, .70, .74, .68 relatively. Empathy, respect and authoritative scales were regarded as the basic dimensions of parent's behavior. For clinical validation, we divided the preschooler care-giver sample into 8 groups according to scores of the basic dimensions and compared the 8 groups with parenting stress and parenting self-efficacy scores. The results indicated that three basic factors would have different effects on parental experiences and satisfaction. We suggested the clinical implication and limitation of this instrument.