• 제목/요약/키워드: Computerized glow curve deconvolution

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.02초

Optical Sensitivity of TL Glow Peaks Separated Using Computerized Glow Curve Deconvolution for RTL Quartz

  • Kim, Myung-Jin;Kim, Ki-Bum;Hong, Duk-Geun
    • Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
    • /
    • 제43권3호
    • /
    • pp.114-119
    • /
    • 2018
  • Background: The retrospective dosimetry using RTL quartz can be improved by information for an optical sensitivity of sample connected with the equivalent dose determination. Materials and Methods: The quartz sample from a volcanic rock of Japan was used. After correcting the thermal quenching effect, RTL peaks of quartz were separated by the CGCD method cooperated with the general order kinetics. The number of overlapped glow peaks were ascertained by the $T_m-T_{stop}$ method. The optical sensitivity was examined by comparing the change of intensity on RTL glow peaks measured after exposure to light from a solar simulator with various illumination times. Results and Discussion: Seven glow peaks appeared to be overlapped on the RTL glow curve. The general order kinetics model was appropriate to separate glow peaks. After exposure to light from a solar simulator from a few minutes to 416 hr, the signals for peaks P4 and P5 decayed following the form of $f(t)=a_1e^{-{\lambda}1t}$, while the signals for peaks P6 and P7 decayed by the form of $f(t) = a_1e^{-{\lambda}1t}+a_2e^{-{\lambda}2t}+a_3e^{-{\lambda}3t}$. Conclusion: For dosimetric peaks, the times taken to reduce the RTL signal to half of its initial value were 70 sec for the peak P4, 54 s for the peak P5, 9,840 sec for the peak P6 and 26,580 sec for the peak P7, respectively. We conclude that the optical sensitivity of peaks P4, and P5 gives much higher than that of peaks P6 and P7.

The Retrieval of Abnormal TL Glow Curves Using Modified Glow Curve Analysis Method

  • Lee, Sang-Yoon;Lee, Kun-Jai;Kim, Jang-Lyul;Chang, Si-Young
    • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • 제29권5호
    • /
    • pp.385-392
    • /
    • 1997
  • The shape of TL glow curve is a useful indicator for assurance of correct reading of the personal dosimeter. Since the reading procedure of TLD is irreversible, however, an analytic remedy should be considered to procure reliable dosimetric information for the readings with irregular glow con shape. In this study, kinetic trapping parameters of CaSO$_4$ : Dy Teflon personal dosimeter(Teledyne PB-6A) were analyzed by Halperin and Braner's model for general-order kinetics. From these kinetic tapping parameters, we also developed a simple procedure to retrieve the dosimetric information from abnormally distorted glow curves. The computerized glow curve deconvolution(CGCD) fitting of the reference glow curve with kinetic parameters from this study yields relative errors of about 5% from the expected integral. It was also found that the glow curve remedial procedure developed could retrieve the distorted TL glow curves within ewer ranges of 1575. With the glow curve retrieval techniques, doses incurred by gamma radiation can now be successfully re-constructed for the CaSO$_4$ : Dy Teflon dosimeter resulting abnormal glow curves.

  • PDF

LiF:Mg, Cu, Na, Si TL 물질의 열자극발광스펙트럼 측정 및 분석 (The Measurement and Analysis of LiF:Mg, Cu, Na, Si TL Material by Thermoluminescence Spectrum)

  • 이정일;문정학;김덕훈
    • 한국안광학회지
    • /
    • 제6권1호
    • /
    • pp.149-153
    • /
    • 2001
  • LiF:Mg, Cu, Na, Si TL 물질의 열자극발광을 온도대 파장대 발광강도의 3차원으로 측정하여 분석하였다. 온도대 발광강도곡선(glow curve)은 각 온도에서 파장별 발광강도데이터를 적분하여 구성하였고, 이를 분석하여 트랩에 관계되는 여러가지 파라미터들을 결정하였다. 발광곡선의 분석은 일반차 모델의 TL 강도 표현식을 기본함수로 하여 컴퓨터화된 발광곡선 분해(Computerized Glow Curve Deconvolution: CGCD)기법을 이용하였고, 그 결과 LiF:Mg, Cu, Na, Si TL 물질의 열자극발광곡선은 정점온도 333 K, 374 K 426 K, 466 K, 483 K 그리고 516 K를 갖는 6개의 개별적인 발광곡선들로 구성되어 있음을 확인하였다. 주 피크(main peak)인 456 K 발광곡선에 대하여 활성화에너지는 2.06 eV, 발광차수는 1.05로 밝혀졌다. 발광스펙트럼 분석결과 LiF:Mg, Cu, Na, Si TL 물질은 3개의 재결합준위 1.80 eV, 2.88 eV 그리고 3.27 eV를 가지는 것으로 판명되었다. 이 중 약 2.88 eV 준위가 지배적이고 다음으로 3.27eV 준위에서 발광이 일어나며 1.80 eV 준위는 극히 미약하나 분명한 존재를 확인하였다.

  • PDF

ANALYSIS OF THE LiF:Mg,Cu,Si TL AND THE LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL GLOW CURVES BY USING GENERAL APPROXIMATION PLUS MODEL

  • Chang, In-Su;Lee, Jung-Il;Kim, Jang-Lyul;Oh, Mi-Ae;Chung, Ki-Soo
    • Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
    • /
    • 제34권4호
    • /
    • pp.155-164
    • /
    • 2009
  • In this paper, we used computerized glow curve deconvolution (CGCD) software with several models for the simulation of a TL glow curve which was used for analysis. By using the general approximation plus model, parameters values of the glow curve were analyzed and compared with the other models parameters (general approximation, mixed order kinetics, general order kinetics). The LiF:Mg,Cu,Si and the LiF:Mg,Cu,P material were used for the glow curve analysis. And we based on figure of merits (FOM) which was the goodness of the fitting that was monitored through the value between analysis model and TLD materials. The ideal value of FOM is 0 which represents a perfect fit. The main glow peak makes the most effect of radiation dose assessment of TLD materials. The main peak of the LiF:Mg,Cu,Si materials has a intensity rate 80.76% of the whole TL glow intensity, and that of LiF:Mg,Cu,P materials has a intensity rate 68.07% of the whole TL glow intensity. The activation energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,Si was analyzed as 2.39 eV by result of the general approximation plus(GAP) model. In the case of mixed order kinetics (MOK), the activation energy was analyzed as 2.29 eV. The activation energy was analyzed as 2.38 eV by the general order kinetics (GOK) model. In the case of LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLD, the activation energy was analyzed as 2.39 eV by result of the GAP model. In the case of MOK, the activation energy was analyzed as 2.55 eV. The activation energy was analyzed as 2.51 eV by the GOK model. The R value means different ratio of retrapping-recombination. The R value of LiF:Mg,Cu,Si TLD main peak analyzed as $1.12\times10^{-6}$ and $\alpha$ value analyzed as $1.0\times10^{-3}$. The R of LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLD analyzed as $7.91\times10^{-4}$, the $\alpha$ value means different ratio of initial thermally trapped electron density-initial trapped electron density (include thermally disconnected trap electrons density). The $\alpha$ value was analyzed as $9.17\times10^{-1}$ which was the difference from LiF:Mg,Cu,Si TLD. The deep trap electron density of LiF:Mg,Cu,Si was higher than the deep trap electron density of LiF:Mg,Cu,P.