• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제31권5호
• /
• pp.73-85
• /
• 2003

With more and more people paying attention to substantial democracy, participatory democracy is presented as a practical strategy and an index of Korean democracy. In this social and political atmosphere, participation in environmental planning and design is essential. Nonetheless, the true meaning of “participation” is not used properly because many people do not understand it correctly, The concept of social and political participation is “the action or attempt of ordinary members of society for affecting on the result of decision making.” Based on this concept, participation is accomplished through conventional means and as a form of mobilization in environmental planning and desist Most of the theories on public participation in landscape architecture are technical theories. Therefore, this paper proposes that planning and design of landscape architecture be understood as a communicative action that aims to enable stakeholders to reach a consensus through communication. This study offers the framework of theory to understand and practice planning and design of landscape architecture as a communicative action, after reviewing communicative action theory and communicative planning theory. Results suggest that communicative action theory should be accepted in landscape architecture to overcome the shortcomings of instrumental rationality -- the same way planning theory accepted this theory --and to join the culture of experts focusing on the artistic truth and the culture of life of the world. In addition, accepting communicative action theory enables the acquisition of the instrumental effect and social learning effect and the making of social capital. This study also suggested prerequisite for using the method. There should be change in the social institution and in individual action. In addition the method is composed of three steps: creating the atmosphere for communication; communicating, and; reaching a consensus among stakeholders. Finally, raising the possibility of applying the theory presented in this study requires the accumulation of know-how through trial and error.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.78-89
• /
• 2003

This paper presents a community participatory small-park design. It proposes that environmental planning and design can be understood as a communicative action that aims to achieve consensus among stakeholders through communication with the local residents. By studying the communicative action theory and communicative planning theory, three strategies were set for practicing small-park design as a communicative action: (1) stakeholders should how what data and actions are needed; (2) citizens should have access to the data and participate in the process; (3) the community's concerns should be consulted and their opinions heard. In applying the three strategies to the small-Park design, a council composed of experts, community members, and NGO's was established. All processes were then executed after careful deliberation. From interviews, the town-touring program and surveys, the design of the site was determined among the stakeholders. The site was subsequently designed based on the needs of the community and revised according to their suggestions. Finally, the small park was constructed. Even though the researchers experienced many limitations because the site is very small, the significance of this study can be outlined as follows: (1) the need to construct the park was suggested by the community rather than by the administration; (2) experts, members of the community, and NGO's constituted the council; (3) the design process involved deliberation among the members of council rather than a method previously established by experts; (4) the administration supported rather than led the entire process: (5) citizens discussed and reached a consensus by themselves.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권11호
• /
• pp.125-134
• /
• 2018

This study examines Dalibor Vesely's theoretical proposition of communicative space and tries to develop it through a review of the contemporary architectural case. Vesely poses a critical question about communication: how do the situational conditions of our everyday life and the spatial characteristics of the natural world in which we live communicate through representation. He emphasizes the spatial and situational conditions and the role of representation in communication, arguing that architecture should create the formation of communicative space to restore its primary role as the corporeal foundation of culture. This study thus focuses on one of the critical concepts of his theory: "the communicative movement," which is, according to him, ontological and situational because it animates and transforms human circumstances as a whole. Further, it pursues some practical knowledge of creating the communicative space, by examining the design theory and practice of Zaha Hadid, who thematizes communication and movement in her architectural approach. This study analyses the different levels of representation and modes of movement in her architectural space to reveal the possibilities and limits of its communicative roles. We will find that the representation of Hadid's architectural space is not the formal representation of reality, but a mathematical and projective representation of abstract concepts. Despite its apparent aesthetic consistency, the inward and self-referential relation between the individual elements of the architectural space reveals its limit for the communicative space.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.92-100
• /
• 2015

대부분의 일반적인 계획 과정과 달리, 브라운필드 계획은 잠재된 오염문제로 인한 기술적, 법률적 전문지식을 필요로 한다. 성공적으로 통합적인 의사결정에 관여하기 위해서는 조정된 협력적 계획 모델이 중요하다. 본 연구는 기존의 협력적 계획 접근방식이 브라운 필드 재생에 있어 상반된 분야의 전문가들 및 지역 주민들이 함께 일하며 적절하게 균형 잡힌 협력을 이루어 내기 위한 어려움들을 극복하는 데에 어떻게 효과적으로 적용될 수 있는지 알아보는 것을 목표로 한다. 의사소통적 계획이론 관련 문헌분석을 통해 적절한 지표들을 찾아내어, 네 단계의 브라운 필드 계획과정(대상지 선별, 평가, 정화, 디자인)에 적용시켜 본 후, 중요한 부분들을 짚어내었다. 본 연구의 결과, 크게 세 가지 점에 초점을 맞춘, 브라운 필드 재생에 적합한 협력적 계획 모델의 필요성이 인식되었다(1. 사회, 문화, 디자인 분야와 과학, 기술 분야의 전문가 간의 균형 잡힌 대화의 촉진, 2. 일반주민들과의 잠재적 오염 위험과 관련한 커뮤니케이션을 위한 적절한 방법개발, 3. 전문가 주도의 객관적 데이터와 주민 의견 중심의 주관적 데이터의 통합을 위한 의사결정지원 시스템의 마련).

• 한국디지털건축인테리어학회논문집
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.41-50
• /
• 2011

Skeptical responses to urban design based on the Physical Planning theory assuming the existence of social agreement and the absolute authorities of planners bring about alternatives such as Participatory Planning and Community Design derived from Harbermas' Communicative Rationality. But the normative contentions do not progress any more to the stage of presenting practical strategies. This is the cause why there should be systematic approaches to reveal the relationships among various concepts or variables. With regard to the Community Design this study intends to take a statistical approach to find relationship between project scale and its accomplishment. The hypothesis that the smaller scale of project begets the better outcomes was tested to be rejected as a result of the analysis of variance. But the result also shows that appropriate density in relatively large area makes residents' expected satisfaction high. Although this discovery has its own meaning the tryout is anticipated to laying the cornerstone of quantitative analyses in the following studies.