• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.31-36
• /
• 2002

Objective : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results after treatment of old ACL(anterior cruciate ligament) avulsion fracture of tibia. Materials and Method : 11 cases who were followed up at least 2 years after treatment in chronic ACL avulsion fracture of tibia were included in this study. The average age of patients was 26(9-66) years and the mean period of follow up was 53(24-131) months. After evaluation of the lesion and treatment of associated lesion under arthroscope, open reduction and internal fixation or fragment removal was performed. Pull-out suture was performed in 8 cases, screw fixation in 2 cases. Results : The Lysholm knee score was 64.3 in average preoperatively and improved to 96.2 average at follow up. On the Lachman test, there were mild(+) instabilities in 7 cases, moderate(++) in 4 cases. On the postoperative Lachman test, there were no instabilities in 9 cases, mild(+) instabilities in only 2 cases. According to Meyers and Mckeever's evaluation protocol, 9 cases $(81.8\%)$ were excellent, 2 case $(18.2\%)$, good. On preoperative instrumented anterior laxity test with $Telos^{\circledR}$, side to side difference in 201b was 7.8(10-4) min in average and 2.1(6-0) mm in average at follow-up. Conclusion : In chronic ACL avulsion fracture, it is thought that combination of arthroscopic evaluation of associated injury and open reduction and fixation and fragment removal can bring about satisfactory results.

• Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.167-172
• /
• 2005

Purpose: We report our results of arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic avulsion fracture of the malleolus in chronic ankle pain, and also analyzed the clinical and radiological features for evaluating the good candidate for arthroscopic treatment. Materials and Methods: Fourteen patients who were diagnosed with intra-articular avulsion fractures of the malleolus received arthroscopic surgery and were followed up for at least a year. The clinical and radiological characters including MRI and arthroscopic findings were reviewed. Clinical assessments were done according to the AOFAS score system. Results: There was a history of inversion type of the injury in most cases and local tenderness of lesion site was a unique. MRI study showed thickened anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) in 8 cases (57%) and discontinued ATFL in 3 cases (21%). Enhanced signal surrounding soft tissue corresponding to synovial inflammation and impingement was found in 12 cases (86%). Preoperative score of all patients were $74.0{\pm}5.5$, which improved to $89.3{\pm}6.7$ at the follow-up after the treatment (P<0.001). Conclusion: Most patients had history of injury and localized tenderness in the area coinciding with radiological findings. Thickened ATFL and contrast enhancement around the ossicle were frequently found. Symptomatic avulsion fractures of the malleolus associated with the clinical and radiological findings above could be a good candidate for arthroscopic treatment.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• v.43 no.2
• /
• pp.134-144
• /
• 2016

In adults, mallet finger is a traumatic zone I lesion of the extensor tendon with either tendon rupture or bony avulsion at the base of the distal phalanx. High-energy mechanisms of injury generally occur in young men, whereas lower energy mechanisms are observed in elderly women. The mechanism of injury is an axial load applied to a straight digit tip, which is then followed by passive extreme distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) hyperextension or hyperflexion. Mallet finger is diagnosed clinically, but an X-ray should always be performed. Tubiana's classification takes into account the size of the bony articular fragment and DIPJ subluxation. We propose to stage subluxated fractures as stage III if the subluxation is reducible with a splint and as stage IV if not. Left untreated, mallet finger becomes chronic and leads to a swan-neck deformity and DIPJ osteoarthritis. The goal of treatment is to restore active DIPJ extension. The results of a six- to eight-week conservative course of treatment with a DIPJ splint in slight hyperextension for tendon lesions or straight for bony avulsions depends on patient compliance. Surgical treatments vary in terms of the approach, the reduction technique, and the means of fixation. The risks involved are stiffness, septic arthritis, and osteoarthritis. Given the lack of consensus regarding indications for treatment, we propose to treat all cases of mallet finger with a dorsal glued splint except for stage IV mallet finger, which we treat with extra-articular pinning.