• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제81권1호
• /
• pp.166-175
• /
• 2020

목적 간세포암의 화학색전술에 사용되는 조영제인 Ioversol 320과 Iopamidol 250을 영상 화질과 유해반응에서 차이가 있는지 비교 분석하고자 하였다. 대상과 방법 경동맥 화학색전술을 시행 받은 113명의 간세포암 환자를 대상으로 후향적으로 분석하였고, Iopamidol 250은 44명, Ioversol 320은 69명에게 주입하였다. 영상 화질은 혈관인지도 및 일치도로 평가하였다. 혈관인지도는 두 명의 영상의학과 전문의가 간동맥 혈관조영술에서 간세분엽동맥, 췌십이지장동맥, 우위동맥, 우위대망동맥이 보이는 인지도와 명확도에 따라 3단계로 점수화하였다. 일치도는 혈관조영술과 전산화단층촬영에서 발견된 간세포암 수를 비교하였다. 시술 전후 임상증상을 조사하여 조영제 유해반응을 평가하였다. 결과 혈관인지도의 평균 점수는 Iopamidol 250은 2.92점, Ioversol 320은 2.94점이었다. 일치도는 Iopamidol 250은 31명(70.5%), Ioversol 320은 46명(66.7%)이 일치했으며, 혈관인지도와 일치도는 통계적 유의한 차이가 없었다(p > 0.05). Iopamidol 250은 1명, Ioversol 320은 6명의 환자가 오심을 호소하였으며, 유해반응 빈도의 유의한 차이는 없었다(p = 0.24). 결론 간세포암 화학색전술에서 Iopamidol 250은 Ioversol 320과 영상의 화질 및 유해반응에 유의한 차이가 없이 사용될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.81-90
• /
• 1994

Purpose : The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical results of thermo-irradiation treatment for surgically unresectable advanced hepatoma with or without hepatic arterial chemo-embolization (HACE), chemotherapy (CT) and interferon (IFN) therapy. Materials and Methods : Between February 1990 and December 1992, 45 Patients with surgically unresectable advanced hepatomas were treated by thermo-irradiation with or without hepatic arterial chemo-embolization and other treatment modalities. Among them, We analyzed retrospectively 25 patients who received more than three times of hyperthermias. Mean age was 50 years (range : 18-71 years) and male to female ratio was 20 : 5. In the study, treatment was administered as follows : 3 patients received radiation therapy(RT) and hyperthermia (HT). 3 received RT+HT+CT. 3 received RT+HT+HACE. 1 received RT+HT+CT+HACE. 2 received RT+HT+CT+IFN. 10 received RT+HT+HACE+IFN. 3 received RT+HT+CT+HACE+IFN. Radiation therapy was done by a 6 MV linear accelerator Patients were treated with daily fractions of 180 cGy to doses of 11Gy-50Gy (median 30Gy). Local hyperthermia was done by HEH-500C(Omron Co. Japan), 30-45 min/session, 2 sessions/wk and the number of HT sessions ranged from 3 to 17 (median 7 times). 15 patients of 25 were followed by abdominal CT scan or abdominal ultra-sonogram. The following factors were analyzed :Age, histologic grade, sex. number of hyperthermia, total RT dose, hepatic arterial chemo-embolization. Results : Of 25 patients. there were observed tumor regression (partial response and minimal response) in 6 (24$ \% $), no response in 8 (32$ \% $), progression in 1 (4$ \% $) and not evaluable ones in 10 (40$ \% $) radiographically. The over all 1-year survival was 25$ \% $, with a mean survival of 33 weeks. The treatment modes of partial and minimal responsive patients (PR+MR)were as follows : Two were treated with RT+HT+HACE, 2 were done with RT+HT+HACE+IFN Remaining 2 were treated with RT+HT+CT+HACE+IFN. The significant factor affecting the survival rate were RT dose (more than 25 Gy), HACE, number of HT (above 6 times), responsiveness after treatment (PR + MR). Age, sex, histologic differentiation, chemotherapy, interferon therapy were not statistically significant factors affecting the survival rate. Conclusion : Although follow-up duration was short, the thermo-irr3diBtion with/without hepatic arterial chemo-embolization was well tolerated and there were no serious complicatons. In future, it is considered the longer follow up and prospective, well controlled trials should be followed to evaluate the efficacies of survival advantage.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권9호
• /
• pp.3915-3920
• /
• 2014

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a dismal tumor with a high incidence, prevalence and poor prognosis and survival. Management of HCC necessitates multidisciplinary clinics due to the wide heterogeneity in its presentation, different therapeutic options, variable biologic behavior and background presence of chronic liver disease. We studied the different prognostic factors that affected survival of our patients to improve future HCC management and patient survival. Materials and Methods: This study is performed in a specialized multidisciplinary clinic for HCC in Kasr El Eini Hospital, Cairo University, Egypt. We retrospectively analyzed the different patient and tumor characteristics and the primary mode of management applied to our patients. Further analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate statistics. Results: During the period February 2009 till February 2013, 290 HCC patients presented to our multidisciplinary clinic. They were predominantly males and the mean age was $56.5{\pm}7.7years$. All cases developed HCC on top of cirrhosis that was mainly due to HCV (71%). Most of our patients were Child-Pugh A (50%) or B (36.9%) and commonly presented with small single lesions. Transarterial chemoembolization was the most common line of treatment used (32.4%). The overall survival was 79.9% at 6 months, 54.5% at 1 year and 22.4% at 2 years. Serum bilirubin, site of the tumor and type of treatment were the significant independent prognostic factors for survival. Conclusions: Our main prognostic variables are the bilirubin level, the bilobar hepatic affection and the application of specific treatment (either curative or palliative). Multidisciplinary clinics enhance better HCC management.