• Global Cultural Contents
• /
• no.32
• /
• pp.219-235
• /
• 2018

This study started with the two fundamental questions of the global economic crisis : whether the present economic, economic and social system can survive the present life, and whether the crisis can solve the crisis with economic logic. It was an attempt to explore alternative economic models of alternative economic models by examining the history, status, challenge, challenge and success tasks of the French social solidarity economie (ESS, Economie Sociale et Solidaire), an alternative to the new economic and social development. The roles and duties of the social solidarity economy (civic groups, corporations, and governments) were examined to have a successful outcome in order to re-evaluate the functions and roles of the French social solidarity economy. Though the le repport of Vercamer(2010) and the charter of Social Economy(1980), we analyzed four projects that move the social economics model of sharing: democratic operations, human centered economy, solidarity investments, free participation, free participation, etc. Subsequently, the activities of social solidarity, which account for more than 10 percent of the current French economy, have drawn hints on the social and social implications of the Korean society, and have focused on creating a new alternative to the economic and social crises facing the Korean society, and exploring the possibility of a socio-economic crisis in Korea today. These studies have introduced the ideological factors and the types of achievements in the French social solidarity economie, from the 19th century to the present, and at the same time, the rationale and justification for continued economic experiment in Korea, which faces depression and economic crises.

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.39
• /
• pp.137-174
• /
• 2021

The main theme of this paper centers on how to promote Three Major Works of Daesoon Jinrihoe, charity aid, social welfare, and education projects, during the unification period. Determining the best methods of promotion is crucial because the Three Major Works must be carried out after unification, and the works must remain based on the practice of the philosophy of Haewon-sangsaeng (the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence). The idea of Haewon-sangsaeng is in line with the preface of the U.N. Charter and the aim of world peace. North Korean residents are suffering from starvation under their devastated economy, which is certain to face a crisis of materialistic deficiency during reunification. In this study, the peaceful unification of Germany, unification under a period of sudden changes in Yemen, and the militarized unification of Vietnam were taken as case studies to diagnose and analyze the conditions which would affect the implementation of the Three Major Works. These three styles of unification commonly required a considerable budget and other forms of support to carry out the Three Major Works. Especially if unification were to occur after a period of sudden changes, this would require solutions to issues of food, shelter, and medical support due to the loss of numerous lives and the destruction of infrastructure. On the other hand, the UNHCR model was analyzed to determine the implications of expanding mental well prepared and sufficiently qualified professionals, reorganizing standard organizations within complex situations, task direction, preparing sufficient relief goods, budgeting, securing bases in border areas with North Korea, and establishing networks for sponsorship. Based on this, eight detailed tasks in the field of system construction could be used by the operators of the Three Major Works to prepare for unification. Additionally, nine tasks for review were presented in consideration of the timing of unification and the current situation between South and North Korea. In conclusion, in the event of unification, the Three Major Works should not be neglected during the transition period. The manual "Three Major Works during the Unification Period" should include strategic points on organizational formation and mission implementation, forward base and base operation, security and logistics preparation, public relations and external cooperation, safety measures, and transportation and contact systems.