• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제57권4호
• /
• pp.433-452
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to provide implications for improvement of mathematics textbook based on discursive approach to textbook analysis that complementarily combines a communicational approach to cognition and social semiotics. For this purpose, we reconstructed an analytic framework for discursive approach to written discourses of Korean textbook and CMP, and applied it to our analysis. Results show that several characteristics in meanings were developed by the use of words and visual mediators. First, in the case of ideational meaning, there were qualitative and quantitative differences between vocabularies used and between information addressed by visual mediators. Second, in the case of structural meaning, an offer and application of procedure was emphasized in a Korean textbook, whereas expectation and selection experiences of diverse possibilities for problem solving was underlined in CMP. In the case interpersonal meaning of student-author, imperative instructions were paid attentions in a Korean textbook. In contrast, students' interdependence and active participation were stressed in CMP. Therefore, this study addressed ideas about how to analyze mathematics textbooks based on integrated meanings developed by the use of words and visual mediators. In addition, it distributes implications for improvements of Korean mathematics textbooks through the analytic framework of both mathematical meanings and interpersonal meanings of student-author.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제52권1호
• /
• pp.43-63
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to find meaningful implications for developing curriculum and textbooks by comparison between Korean middle school mathematics textbooks and U.S.A.'s CMP textbooks. After comparing and analysing how the contents are composed focusing on the equations and functions and how the contents are presented according to 'Project 2061' mathematical textbook analytical framework, and how the contents ere different in terms of the mathematical connectivity, the research reached the following conclusions. First, compared to Korean textbooks, the CMP textbooks clearly present learners' behavior goals in a detailed way, and emphasize communication and connectivity. Second, Korean textbooks focus on explaining concepts and solving problems related to their concepts and discussion questions are briefly introduced. But all the textbooks contain a lot of problems required to be solved with algorithms. On the other hand, CMP textbooks provide students with opportunities to find the necessary concepts on their own, through problem solving processes, after presenting various real-life problem situations.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제62권2호
• /
• pp.237-255
• /
• 2023

본 연구에서는 담론적 관점에서 우리날 중학교 1학년 교과서 3종과 미국 CMP 교과서 담론에서 생성된 히스토그램의 의미를 분석하는 한편, 히스토그램 과제의 통계적 문제해결 단계별 발문의 특징을 조사하여 향후 히스토그램에 관한 교과서 담론 개선에 구체적인 아이디어를 제공하고자 한다. 분석 결과 첫째, 국내 교과서와 미국 CMP 교과서에서 히스토그램을 정의하는 방식의 차이가 있었고, 둘째, 교과서에서 히스토그램의 의미를 구성하는 담론적 구조는 다양했다. 셋째, 히스토그램 과제에 반영된 통계적 문제해결 단계가 제한적이었고, 넷째, 국내 교과서와 미국 CMP 교과서의 히스토그램 과제 발문에서 학생들에게 요구하는 활동에 차이가 나타났다. 이를 바탕으로 히스토그램을 정의하는 과정과 과제의 발문 개선에 대한 아이디어를 제안하고자 한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제58권1호
• /
• pp.139-160
• /
• 2019

This study attempts to examine statistical tasks in the middle-school mathematics textbooks of Korea and Connected Mathematics 3 [CMP] of the US in terms of an opportunity-to-learn for statistical reasoning. We utilized an analytical framework consisting of types of context, statistical reasoning level, cognitive demand of the tasks, and types of student response. The findings from the task analysis suggested that Korean textbooks focused on finding answers by applying previously learned algorithms or formulas and thus provided students with very limited opportunities to experience statistical reasoning. Also, the results proposed that the mathematical tasks in statistics unit of CMP3 offer more essential and complex tasks that promote students' conceptual understanding of various statistical ideas and statistical reasoning in a meaningful way.