• Title/Summary/Keyword: CEO Nomination Committee

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

How Does the Internal Colonialism of Local Broadcasting Work? Focusing on Governance Including the Appointment of CEO and Its Improvement (지역방송의 내부 식민지는 어떻게 작동하는가? 사장선임 등 지배구조 분석과 개선방안)

  • Kim, Jae-Young;Lee, Seung-Sun
    • Korean journal of communication and information
    • /
    • v.78
    • /
    • pp.35-78
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study pays attention to the assumption that the governance including the appointment of CEO is a key factor in the internal colonialism of local broadcasting. To evaluate the tendencies, it collects and analyzes the profile of CEOs, directors, and shareholders of the 17 regional affiliates of MBC and 9 local commercial broadcasting companies between the early and mid-1990s and 2015. It also discusses the local broadcasting personnel and its operations. By doing so, the study attempts to reveal how the internal colonialism of local broadcasting works. It finds out that the governance of regional broadcasters of MBC is controlled by the head office located in Seoul. At the same time, the governance of local commercial broadcasters is encroached by the tyrannical practices of major shareholders caused by the non-separation of ownership and management. These kinds of abnormal management of governance tend to constrain the investment on personnel and production. Finally, this study suggests some desirable directions of governance focusing on the appointment of CEO in terms of both legislative system and self-regulation. They include establishing a new proviso for programming protocols in local broadcasting, introducing a CEO & non-executive director nomination committee, and so forth.

  • PDF

A Comparative Analysis of Corporate Governance Guidelines: Bangladesh Perspective

  • Rahman, Md. Musfiqur;Khatun, Naima
    • Asian Journal of Business Environment
    • /
    • v.7 no.2
    • /
    • pp.5-16
    • /
    • 2017
  • Purpose - The purpose of this research study is to make a comparative analysis between corporate governance guidelines 2016 and 2012 and area of further improvement to ensure better governance, accountability and transparency. Research design, data and methodology - This research study is mainly based on the corporate governance guidelines 2016 and 2012 issued by the regulatory authority known as Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission (BSEC). Results - This study finds that corporate governance guideline 2012 include some new issues such as criteria and qualification of independent director; some additional statements in the directors' report; mandatory requirement of separation of chairman and CEO; constitution of audit committee; chairman of audit committee; role of audit committee, duties of CEO and CFO on financial statements; and collection of compliance certificate from professional accountant or secretary in compare to corporate governance guidelines 2016. Conclusions - This study suggests that the regulatory authority should include more issues such as tax management and reporting, risk management and reporting; individual and overall performance analysis of the board and independent directors; separate nomination and compensation committee; assessment of true independence of the board and its supporting committees to ensure higher quality of corporate governance and transparency.