• 한국환경보건학회지
• /
• 제46권5호
• /
• pp.495-503
• /
• 2020

Objective: This study aimed to compare the characteristics of humidifier disinfectant-like products (HD-like products) and humidifier disinfectant products (HD products) and introduce actual cases of the usage of HD-like products in hospitals based on an on-site investigation. Methods: The characteristics, chemical components, and usage of HD-like products (Hichlor or Biospot) and HD products (N-with) containing NaDCC (sodium dichloroisocyanurate) were compared. In the process of conducting the on-site investigation, four hospitals were identified as previously using HD-like products. Each on-site investigation to identify the use of HD-like products was composed of four parts: 1) hospital infection control guidelines, 2) manual for humidifiers in patient's rooms, 3) interviews with nursing staff, infection managers, and purchase managers, 4) searching on the product purchase system. Results: Although HD-like products (Hichlor and Biospot) and HD products (N-with) were sold for different usage purposes, they were all white-colored and coin-shaped foaming tablets with the same chemical component, NaDCC. The manual for using HD-like products and HD products was similar (inserting the tablet in a humidifier container with water). Among the four hospitals, one had used Hichlor in the same manner as HD (N-with) by inserting a tablet in 1L of water in a filled humidifier container and Biospot as a kind of detergent for humidifier container cleaning. Another two hospitals had used Biospot and/or Aniosyme as a kind of detergent for humidifier container cleaning. The other hospital had used unknown product in the same manner as N-with, so we thus assumed it was either an HD products (N-with) or HD-like products (Hichlor, Biospot). Conclusion: This study raises the possibility of the development of adverse health effects similar to exposure to an HD-products when exposed to an HD-like products and the possibility of further use in other medical institutions or multi-use facilities. Therefore, an expansion of the investigation is needed in order to confirm whether there have been similar cases in the past.

• 식물병연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.187-192
• /
• 2008

본 연구에서는 키토메이트, 다이균, IC-66D, 골드보르도, 바이오스팟 등 5종의 친환경농자재의 포도 주요 균류병 병원균 7가지에 대한 생장억제 효과를 검정하였다. 병원균의 생장억제 효과는 친환경농자재 별로 차이를 보였는데, 천연 식물추출물성분인 다이균의 생장억제 효과가 가장 우수하였다. 다이균은 $2,500{\mu}g{\cdot}mL^{-1}$을 포함한 PDA 배지에서 C. gloeosporioides 04-159를 제외한 병원균의 균사생장을 75% 이상 억제하였다. 키토메이트의 생장억제 효과는 병원균에 따라 큰 차이가 있었는데 $40,000{\mu}g{\cdot}mL^{-1}$을 함유한 PDA 배지에서 B. cinerea 06-063의 균사생장을 81.1% 억제한 반면에 탄저병균인 C. gloeosporioides 04-159는 6.5% 균사 생장억제율을 보였다. 두 가지 보르도액 제제인 IC-66D와 골드보르도의 생장억제 효과는 흰얼룩 증상의 원인균인 Acremonium sp.을 제외하고 IC-66D가 골드보르도보다 약간 높았다. 바이오스팟은 다이균 다음으로 생장억제 효과가 높았는데 특히 탄저병균인 C. gloeosporioides 04-159에 대해서는 사용한 농자재 중에서 가장 높았다. 키토메이트, 바이오스팟, 골드보르도의 갈색무의병 포자 발아억제율은 같은 농도에서의 균사 생장억제율보다 월등히 높았다. 본 실험은 포도 친환경적병 방제를 위해서는 한 가지 친환경농자재를 사용할 것이 아니라 여러 가지 제제를 다양하게 사용할 것을 제안한다.