• Title/Summary/Keyword: Bioequivalence

Search Result 352, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

Pharmacokinetic Study of Aceclofenac and its Metabolites, and Application to Bioequivalence Study (아세클로페낙과 그 대사체의 약물동태 연구 및 생물학적 동등성)

  • Ihm, Chun-Hwa;Hwang, In-Taek;Kim, Eun-Young;Kang, Won-Ku
    • Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
    • /
    • v.16 no.1
    • /
    • pp.52-56
    • /
    • 2006
  • Aceclofenac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent of a phenylacetic acid type, has been used for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthrits. Although the metabolic pathway of aceclofenc is relatively well-known in vitro, pharmacokinetic profiles of its three major or metabolites are still unclear in human. The present study was designed to investigate pharmacokinetic profiles of the metabolites of aceclofenac, and to evaluate the bioequivalence of the generic preparation of aceclofenac 100 mg tablet. Blood samples were serially collected for a period of 12 hours following a single oral administration of 100 mg aceclofenac in 20 healthy human volunteers. A simple protein precipitation with acetonitrile was employed to purify those substances from plasma. Aceclofenac, diclofenac, 4'-hydroxyaceclofenac and 4'-hydroxy-diclofenac in heparinized plasma were simultaneously measured with flufenamic acid, an internal standard, using HPLC coupled to a tandem mass spectrometer. Time courses of 4'-hydroxydiclofenac, diclofenac and aceclofenac plasma concentrations were clearly revealed, and the pharmacokinetic properties were analyzed. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of test/reference for log-transformed AUC and $C_{max}$ lie within 0.80-1.25.

  • PDF

Bioequivalence Test of Biphenyl Dimethyl Dicarboxylate Products (비페닐디메칠디카르복실레이트 제제의 생물학적 동등성 시험)

  • Han, Sang-Soo;Ham, Seong-Ho;Sohn, Dong-Hwan;Kim, Jae-Baek
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.67-72
    • /
    • 1994
  • Bioequivalence (BE) test of biphenyl dimethyl dicarboxylate (DDB) tablets was performed. Normal healthy male volunteers (n = 20) were randomly divided into 2 groups, and reference $(Nissel{\circledR})$ and test $(Livital{\circledR})$ tablets of DDB $(25mg{\times}8\;Tab.\;= \;200\;mg)$ were given orally by balanced two-period cross-over design. The serum concentration was determined by high performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters, AUC, $C_{max}$, and $T_{max}$ obtained after drug administration were statistically analyzed. Statistical evaluation of the data involved an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for cross-over design. The results were within 20% differences of mean value in AUC, $C_{max}$, and $T_{max}$ between reference and test tablets. The results of ANOVA showed no significant differences for "between group or subject" and "period". The test tablet was bioequivalent with the reference tablet in the AUC, $C_{max}$, and $T_{max}$.

  • PDF

High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic-Tandem Mass Spectrometric Determination of Itraconazole in Human Plasma for Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies

  • Choi, Young-Wook;Nam, Dae-young;Kang, Kyoung-Hoon;Ha, Kyung-Wook;Han, In-Hee;Chang, Byung-Kon;Yoon, Mi-kyeong;Lee, Jae-hwi
    • Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society
    • /
    • v.27 no.2
    • /
    • pp.291-294
    • /
    • 2006
  • A highly sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method (HPLC-MSMS) has been developed to quantify itraconazole in human plasma for the purpose of pharmacokinetic studies. Sample preparation was carried out by liquid-liquid extraction using loratadine as an internal standard. Chromatographic separation used a YMC $C_{18}$ column, giving an extremely fast total run time of 3 min. The method was validated and used for the bioequivalence study of itraconazole tablets in healthy male volunteers (n = 31). The lower limit of detection proved to be 0.2 ng /mL for itraconazole.

Comparison of Parametric and Bootstrap Method in Bioequivalence Test

  • Ahn, Byung-Jin;Yim, Dong-Seok
    • The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
    • /
    • v.13 no.5
    • /
    • pp.367-371
    • /
    • 2009
  • The estimation of 90% parametric confidence intervals (CIs) of mean AUC and Cmax ratios in bioequivalence (BE) tests are based upon the assumption that formulation effects in log-transformed data are normally distributed. To compare the parametric CIs with those obtained from nonparametric methods we performed repeated estimation of bootstrap-resampled datasets. The AUC and Cmax values from 3 archived datasets were used. BE tests on 1,000 resampled data sets from each archived dataset were performed using SAS (Enterprise Guide Ver.3). Bootstrap nonparametric 90% CIs of formulation effects were then compared with the parametric 90% CIs of the original datasets. The 90% CIs of formulation effects estimated from the 3 archived datasets were slightly different from nonparametric 90% CIs obtained from BE tests on resampled datasets. Histograms and density curves of formulation effects obtained from resampled datasets were similar to those of normal distribution. However, in 2 of 3 resampled log (AUC) datasets, the estimates of formulation effects did not follow the Gaussian distribution. Bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) CIs, one of the nonparametric CIs of formulation effects, shifted outside the parametric 90% CIs of the archived datasets in these 2 non-normally distributed resampled log (AUC) datasets. Currently, the 80~125% rule based upon the parametric 90% CIs is widely accepted under the assumption of normally distributed formulation effects in log-transformed data. However, nonparametric CIs may be a better choice when data do not follow this assumption.

Bioequivalence Study of Enalapril Tablet to $Lenipril^{(R)}$ Tablet (레니프릴정(에날라프릴 10 mg)에 대한 에날라프릴정의 생물학적 동등성 평가)

  • Noh, Keum-Han;Bae, Kyoung-Jin;Kang, Won-Ku
    • Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.61-64
    • /
    • 2009
  • The study was designed to compare the rate and extent of absorption of two enalapril tablets (10 mg), which has been widely used for the treatment of hypertension. This bioequivalence study was conducted using a standard preparation as reference and a generic as test in 24 male healthy volunteers. After an overnight fast, a single dose of the test or reference drugs were given with a washout period of 7 days. Heparinized blood samples were serially collected up to 10 hr. Plasma enalapril concentrations were quantified using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The data obtained for each subject was evaluated for $C_{max}$ and $AUC_{10hr}$ with respect to 90% confidence interval for log-transformed data. The 90% confidence intervals were log(0.9384)~log(1.1160) for $AUC_{10hr}$ and log(0.9482)~log(1.1474) for $C_{max}$. Thus, we concluded that the test and reference formulation are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of absorption.

  • PDF

Bioequivalence Evaluation of the Tiropramide hydrochloride (염산티로프라미드제제의 생물학적 동등성 평가)

  • 명승운;김동현;김명수;강태경;민혜기;장윤정;손동렬;홍영훈;신창식
    • Biomolecules & Therapeutics
    • /
    • v.8 no.3
    • /
    • pp.262-268
    • /
    • 2000
  • The bioequivalence of two tiropramide products was evaluated in 18 health male volunteers following oral administration. Test product was Tira $m^{R}$ tablet (Shin Poong SP-102) (Shin Poong Pharm. Co., Ltd.) and reference product was Tirop $a^{R}$ tablet (Dae Woong Pharm. Co., Ltd.) One capsule of the test and reference product containing 100 mg of tropramide.hydrochloride was administered to the volunteers by randomized two period cross-over study (2 $\times$ 2 Latin square method). The drug concentration in plasma was determined by GC/MS for over a period of 12hours after administration. Analysis of variance reveal that there are no differences in AUC (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity), Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) and Tmax (time to reach Cmax). The differences of mean AUC, Cmax and Tmax between two products were 3.85, 1.47 and -3.6%, respectively. Minimum detectable differences (%) at $\alpha$=0.1 were all less than 20% given as a guideline (18.07, 17.00 and 20.69% for AUC, Cmax and Tmax, respectively). From these results, the two products are bioequivalent.ent.

  • PDF

Bioequivalence of Thrumetin Tablet to Tagamet Tablet (Cimetidine 200 mg) (타가메트정(시메티딘 200mg)에 대한 수루메틴정의 생물학적 동등성평가)

  • 이상봉;이경진;신영희
    • YAKHAK HOEJI
    • /
    • v.48 no.5
    • /
    • pp.297-302
    • /
    • 2004
  • The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two cimetidine tablets, Tagamet (Yuhan Pharm. Co., Ltd.) and Nex (Bi-nex Pharm. Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). The cimetidine release from the two cimetidine tablets in vitro was tested using KP Apparatus I method with various dissolution media (pH 1.2, 4.0, 6.8 buffer solutions and water). The dissolution profiles of two cimetidine tablets were very similar at all dissolution media. Twenty four healthy male volunteers were divided into two groups with a randomized $2{\times}2$ cross-over study. After four tablets (800 mg cimetidine) were orally administrated, blood was taken and the concentrations of cimetidine in serum were determined using HPLC with UV detector. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_{t}$, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were determined. The result showed that the differences in $AUC_{t}$, and $C_{max}$ between two cimetidine tablets based on the Tagamet were -6.82% and -12.98%, respectively. There were no sequence effects between two tablets in these parameters. The 90% confidence intervals using logarithmically transformed data were within the acceptance range of log(0.8) to log(1.25) (e.g., log(0.90)log(0.97) and log(0.82)log(0.93) for $AUC_{t}$ and $C_{max}$, respectively), indicating that Thrumetin tablet was bioequivalent to Tagamet tablet.

The Bioequivalence of Plunazol Tablet (Fluconazole 150 mg) to Three capsules of Diflucan 50 mg (디푸루칸 캡슐 50 mg (3 캡슐, 플루코나졸 150mg)에 대한 푸루나졸 정 150mg의 생물학적 동등성)

  • Chang, Hee-Chul;Lee, Min-Suk;Ryu, Chong-Hyon;Lyu, Seung-Hyo;Cho, Sang-Heon;Choi, Yeon-Jin;Hwang, Ae-Kyung;Kim, Yun-Ah;Park, Si-Hyun;Yoon, Ji-Won;Bae, Kyun-Seop
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • v.39 no.3
    • /
    • pp.207-216
    • /
    • 2009
  • Fluconazole is used as an orally administrated antifungal drug for the treatment of tinea corporis, candidiasis including skin mycotic pneumonia infections. The dosage of fluconazole varies with indication ranging from 50 mg/day to 400 mg/day. The fluconazole capsule 50 mg (3 capsules daily) is already available in Korean market. To improve the patient compliance, a fluconazole tablet 150 mg (once a day administration) was developed recently. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of three doses of fluconazole capsule 50 mg (Diflucan 50 mg, Pfizer Korea Inc., as a reference drug) and a single dose of fluconazole tablet 150 mg (Plunazol 150 mg, Daewoong Pharm. Co., Korea) according to the guidelines of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). The bioequivalence for three capsules of Diflucan 50 mg and a single tablet of Plunazol 150 mg was investigated in twenty-four healthy male volunteers under a randomized 2${\times}$2 crossover trial design. The average age of twenty-four volunteers was 24.78${\pm}$3.27 year-old, average height was 175.56${\pm}$5.45 cm and average weight was 67.24${\pm}$6.86 kg. After three capsules of Diflucan 50 mg or a single tablet of Plunazol 150 mg were orally administered, blood was taken at predetermined time intervals and the plasma concentrations of fluconazole in plasma were determined using LC-MS-MS. The 90% confidence intervals for the main parameters of statistical results after logarithmic transformation were AUCt 0.9272-1.0084 and Cmax 0.8423-0.9544 respectively, which are in the range of log 0.8 to log 1.25 and the statistical results of additional parameters (AUClast, t1/2 and MRT) were also in the 90% confidence interval that is in the range of log 0.8 to log 1.25. Therefore, the results of this study confirm the bioequivalence of three capsules of Diflucan 50 mg to one tablet of Plunazol 150 mg.

Bioequivalence of AmbrectTM Tablet to MucopectTM Tablet (Ambroxol hydrochloride 30 mg) (뮤코펙트 정(염산암브록솔 30 mg)에 대한 암브렉트 정의 생물학적 동등성)

  • Yoo, Jeong-Yeon;Joung, Sun-Koung;Choi, Mee-Hee;Han, Sang-Beom;Lee, Kyung-Ryul;Lee, Hee-Joo
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • v.33 no.3
    • /
    • pp.215-221
    • /
    • 2003
  • A bioequivalence study of $Ambrect^{TM}$ tablets (Dong Wha Pharm. Ind. Co., Ltd.) to $Mucopect^{TM}$ tablets (Boehringer Ingelheim Korea, Ltd.) was conducted according to the guideline of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Twenty four healthy male Korea volunteers received each medicine at the ambroxol hydrochloride dose of 30 mg in a $2{\times}2$ crossover study. There was a one-week wash out period between the doses. Plasma concentrations of ambroxol were monitored by a high-performance liquid chromatography for over a period of 24 hours after the administration. $AUC_t$ (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hr) was calulated by the linear trapezoidal rule method. $C_{max}$ (maximum plasma drug concentration) and $T_{max}\;(time\;to\;reach\;C_{max})$ were compiled from the plasma concentration-time data. Analysis of variance was carried out using logarithmically transformed $AUC_t\;and\;C_{max}$. No significant sequence effect was found for all of the bioavailability parameters indicating that the crossover design was properly performed. The 90% confidence intervals of the $AUC_t$ ratio and the $C_{max}$ ratio for $Ambrect^{TM}/Mucopect^{TM}$ were 0.89-1.01 and 0.89-1.02, respectively. These values were within the acceptable bioequivalence intervals of 0.80-1.25. Thus, our study demonstrated the bioequivalence of $Ambrect^{TM}\;and\;Mucopect^{TM}$ with respect to the rate and extent of absorption.

Bioequivalence of Onfran Tablet to Zofran Tablet (Ondansetron 8mg) (조프란 정(온단세트론 8mg)에 대한 온프란 정의 생물학적동등성)

  • 신인철;홍정욱;박윤영;고현철
    • Biomolecules & Therapeutics
    • /
    • v.11 no.1
    • /
    • pp.58-64
    • /
    • 2003
  • Ondansetron is a potent, highly selective 5-hydroxytryptamin $e_3$(5-H $T_3$) receptor-antagonist, for the management of nausea and vomiting induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiography, and the treatment of post-operative nausea and vomiting. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two ondansetron tablets, Zofran (Glaxo Smithcline Korea Ltd.) and Onfran (Korea United Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). Eighteen normal male volunteers, 24.39$\pm$1.69 year in age and 69.00$\pm$6.74kg in body weight, were divided into two groups and a randomized 2${\times}$2 cross-over study was employed. After one tablet containing 8mg of ondansetron was orally administered, blood was taken at predetermined time intervals and the concentrations of ondansetron in plasma were determined using HPLC with UV detector. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as AVC, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were calculated and ANOVA test was utilized for the statistical analysis of the parameters. The results showed that the differences in AUC, $C_{max}$ and T max between two tablets were 5.83%, 5.75% and -5.71%, respectively when calculated against the Zofran, tablet. The powers (1-$\beta$) for AUC, $C_{max}$ and $T_{max}$ were above 90%, above 90% and below 60%, respectively. Minimum detectable differences($\Delta$) at alpha=0.1 and 1-$\beta$=0.8 were less than 20% (e.g., 12.74% and 11.78% for AUC and $C_{max}$ respectively). But minimum detectable differences($\Delta$) at alpha=0.1 and 1-$\beta$=0.8 for $T_{max}$ were more than 20% (e.g., 34.22%). The 90% confidence intervals were within $\pm$20% (e.g., -2.73∼14.39 and -2.16∼13.67 for AUC and $C_{max}$ respectively). But 90% confidence intervals for $T_{max}$ were not within $\pm$20% (e.g., -28.71∼17.28). Another ANOVA test was conducted for logarithmically transformed AUC and $C_{max}$. These results showed that there are no significant difference in AUC and $C_{max}$ between the two formulations: The differences between the formulations in these log transformed parameters were all for less than 20% (e.g., 5.83% and 5.75% for AUC and $C_{max}$ respectively). The 90% confidence intervals for the log transformed data were the acceptance range of log 0.8 to log 1.25 (e.g., log 0.99∼log 1.15 and log 0.98∼log 1.15 for AUC and $C_{max}$ respectively). The major parameters, AUC and $C_{max}$, met the criteria of KFDA for bioequivalence although $T_{max}$ did not meet the criteria of KFDA for bioequivalence, indicating that Onfran tablet is bioequivalent to Zofrm1 tablet.t is bioequivalent to Zofrm1 tablet.m1 tablet.m1 tablet.m1 tablet.