• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2013년 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.99-104
• /
• 2013

비용편익분석은 어떤 사업으로 인하여 자연배분의 변화가 생길 때 그에 따른 경제적 편익을 측정하게 되며 사업을 시행하여 생기는 편익과 비용을 비교하여 경제성을 평가하고 대안 중에서 우선순위를 결정할 때 유용하다. 따라서, 본 논문은 자본에 관한 투자기준을 마련하기 위해서 분석용 모델인 "비용편익분석"을 활용 하여 제조기업의 어떤 사업계획에 의하여 생겨나는 자본요소가 어떻게 투자되어야 생산비용을 최소화 할 수 있는지를 자본투자에서 가장 핵심적인 생산설비투자와 기술개발투자에 대한 비용편익분석을 통하여 그 방법론을 제시함으로써, 자본투자에 있어서 "비용효과분석"의 활용성을 확인하고자 한다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.287-301
• /
• 2012

이 연구는 2011년 현재 운영중인 7개 외국학술지지원센터의 운영효과를 점검하기 위해 그 비용과 편익을 분석하였다. 사업개시부터 30년 경과시점을 기준으로 한 투자타당성 분석 결과, 비용편익 비율(BCR)은 0.99, 내부수익률(IRR)은 5.49%, 누적순현재가치(NPV)는 -507백만원으로 나타났다. 다만 민감도분석에서는 저널 이용건수와 사회적 할인율, 중복구독 중단 등의 항목의 변화에 따라 비용편익비율이 변화할 수 있음을 제시하였다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.507-516
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to use cost-benefit analysis of activity to clarify the economic effect of prepared nurses versus atmospheric environment managing engineers as healthcare managers. Methods: For the study 111 workplaces were surveyed, workplaces in which nurses or atmospheric environment managing engineers were employed as healthcare managers. The survey content included annual gross salaries, participation in external job training, costs in joining association covered by the company, location and year of construction of the healthcare office, various kinds of healthcare expenditures, costs in operating healthcare office, health education, and activity performance in the work of environment management. Results: In the case of the healthcare manager being a nurse, benefit was larger than input costs at a ratio of 2.31. On the other hand, in the case of healthcare manager being an atmospheric environment managing engineer, input costs were larger than benefits (benefit-cost ratio 0.88). Conclusion: Results indicate that nurses are an effective healthcare human resource and can offer good quality healthcare service. Therefore companies should hire nurses and actively promote the economic efficiency of nurses in workplace.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.173-178
• /
• 2001

The aim of this paper is to evaluate users benefit values of theme park using Travel Cost Method with special reference to Woobang Tower Land in Taegu for the estimation of economic values. This research is mainly based on questionnaire survey of 100 users of the theme park. Socio-economic factors such as income, year of education, annual income, age and money(travel cost) are analysed from 5 residential areas of the respondents. Multiple regression analysis was used for the evaluation of annual number of park visitings based on the analysis. The regression model shows NV = $\alpha$+$\beta_1$TC+$\beta_2$INC+$\beta_3$EDU+$\beta_4$AGE (NV : Annual Number of Visitings, TC : Travel Cost, INC : Annual Income, EDU : Years of Education, AGE : Age). Regarding to visitors demand curve based on the equation showed that annual economic values of Woobang Tower Land was estimated as 50billion Korean Won.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.63-72
• /
• 2017

For economic evaluation of integrated operation to sewage facilities, benefit-cost analysis was performed to watershed sewage works project in 7 watershed areas, 156 facilities. In this study, the cost before and after integrated operation was compared and benefits are calculated from the reduction of operators, increasement treated pollution loads, reduction cost through operation convenience, reduction water consumption through effluent reuse, and improvement of life benefit. The result showed that cost was 8,500million won and benefit was 16,747million won, so benefit was 49% higher than cost. B/C analysis result showed that B/C ratio was 1.97 and it is similar to other researches. The benefits of integrated operation included convenience of data management, increase of emergency response, decrease of complains with sewage which was not reflected numerically, so the benefits of integrated operation were expected much greater than this result

• 한국기후변화학회지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.245-254
• /
• 2013

정부에서는 지구온난화에 따른 이산화탄소 저감 및 자원순환형(Zero Waste) 사회구축을 위해 가연성 폐기물을 대상으로 한 고형연료화 사업을 추진 중에 있다. 본 연구에서는 가연성 폐기물 고형연료(SRF) 사업에 대하여 추가 편익을 고려한 경제성 평가를 실시하였다. 경세성 분석은 수도권매립지에 반입되는 폐기물을 대상으로 한 SRF 시설을 가정하였으며, 비용은 건설비와 운영비를 고려하고, 편익으로는 열 및 전력 판매비, 환경 편익, 매립대체 편익을 고려하였다. 결론적으로 SRF 사업은 환경편익 등 기타 사업시행에 대한 편익을 고려하면 1.0으로 산출되었으며, 이 결과는 전력가격 및 물가변동에 따른 인건비 등에 큰 영향을 받는 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 SRF 사업의 지속성을 위해서는 정부의 투자비 지원뿐만 아니라, 전력판매에 따른 적정한 정책지원 방향 설정 등이 필요 하다.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.119-137
• /
• 2010

RFID 확산이 어려운 이유 중 하나는 구체적 경제성 분석 방법의 부재라 할 수 있다. 기존 문헌 분석과 파급 효과가 큰 택배산업 사례를 통해 RFID 도입에 따른 비용/혜택 분석을 포함한 경제성 분석 방법을 제시하였다. RFID 적용 효과의 기대 수준을 낙관적, 보수적, 비관적으로 정의하여 분석하고, 태그 단가 등에 따른 민감도 분석을 통해 RFID 비용과 RFID 기술 기대 수준에 따른 불확실성을 반영하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 RFID 도입을 위한 의사결정에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 예상된다.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제7권5호
• /
• pp.9-18
• /
• 2005

This study delivers the actual condition of investment for industrial accident prevention based on survey of 526 construction sites. The various research techniques were used such as technical statistic analysis for construction industry, construction and civil engineering works, cost comparison of industrial accident prevention and accident loss. A formula was deduced to calculate accident loss and accident frequency by accident prevention cost through regression analysis.

• 가스산업과 기술
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.73-74
• /
• 2001

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.66-83
• /
• 2002

The economic feasibility analysis including benefit-cost ratio and internal rate of return of a land consolidation and on-farm development project was mainly depended upon the direct benefits and costs arising during project life. Therefore the projects were neglected in allocating the government's financial funds and loans on account of the low economic rate of return of the project. Accordingly the extended benefit-cost analysis method should be introduced and adapted to cover not only the benefit s such as non-market values of environmental and food security fun ct ions of the project but also market values of the project outputs. The main purposes of this study are (1) to prepare a guide line for economic feasibility analysis based on the IBRD and ADB guidelines, (2) to estimate the benefits from productivity increase, labor saving, savings of O&M cost of farm mechanization and project facilities, savings of farmer's burden for their public health, increasing environmental and public functional value of paddy fields, improving food security condition and formation of peaceful and uncontroversial rural society by implementing the land consolidation and on-farm development, (3) to introduce the newly adapted analytical method as the extended benefit cost analysis which could make possible to be included the values of non-market goods such as the food security and the environmental public function of paddy fields. To carry out this study, the existing publications on the guidelines for economic agricultural projects were reviewed and consultation was made with a For the post evaluation study of the land consolidation and on-farm development project, field survey in Jigok and other comparative area were made to get available information. According to the project completion report, Jigok land consolidation and on-farm development project has 55ha of benefit area out of 69ha of gross area. The project was started in November 11th, 2000 and completed october 30th, 2001. The total project costs were amounted to 2,548 million won and the annual project benefits were estimated at 335million won evaluated by domestic market prices. The ERR(Economic Rate of Return) and SRR(Social Rate of Return) of the project based on the shadow pricing system were estimated at 4.4% and 16% respectively. On the other hand, the ERR and SRR based on the domestic market value system were amounted to 6.37% and 14.62%. In conclusion, Korean land consolidation and on-farm development projects have not carried out from the view point of economic rate of return under shadow pricing system but from the view point of domestic pricing system. For the future feasibility studies on land consolidation projects have to be carried out including the non-market values as environmental and food security function of the projects.