• 제목/요약/키워드: Bankart

검색결과 126건 처리시간 0.036초

견관절 전방 재발성 탈구에 대한 관혈적 술식과 관절경적 술식의 결과 비교 (Open Versus Arthroscopic Technique in the Traumatic Recurrent Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder)

  • 경희수;전인호;김성중;여준영
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.110-117
    • /
    • 2002
  • Purpose: We compared the results of open and arthroscopic Bankart repair in traumatic recurrent anterior dislocation ,3f the shoulder. Materials and methods: We analysed 7 cases underwent open Bankart repair (group I) and 13 cases underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair (group Ⅱ). The average follow-up period was 68.1 months (51-113 months) in group I and 41.1 months (16~57 months) in group Ⅱ. All patients in group I and Ⅱ were non-athletes. We analyzed statistically objective evaluation, such as the stability of shoulder joint, the range of motion, pain, impaired throwing, Bankart rating system by Rowe and subjective evaluation, visual analog scale (VAS) between two groups. Results: In terms of dominant and non-dominant shoulders, the age at initial episode of dislocation, the elapsed time from injury to surgery, the number of preoperative dislocations associated with susceptibility to apprehension. respectively, there was no statistically significant differences between two groups. In group I the average Rowe's scortls was 84.3 and 3 cases (43%) had excellent results,4 cases (S7cfo), good ones. In group H the average Rowe's scores was 87.3 and 7 cases (54%) had excellent results,6 cases, good ones. There was tendency to show more excellent results in group ll, but there was no statistically significant differences. The average VAS were 90.3 points in group I and 88 points in group Ⅱ, which showed also no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Open and arthroscopic Bankart repairs had no significant difference and showed also good results in travinatic recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder.

견관절 전방 재발성 탈구의 치료-관절경 및 관혈적 Bankart병변 수복술의 비교 - (Bankart Suture Repair for Anterior Instability of the Shoulder- Results of Arthroscopic versus Open Repair -)

  • 최창혁;권굉우;김신근;이상욱;신동규;김경민
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • 제5권1호
    • /
    • pp.47-54
    • /
    • 2002
  • Purpose : We evaluated clinical result of arthroscopic and open Bankart repair in anterior shoulder instability to identify factors iuluencing operative result and prognosis. Materials & Methods . We reviewed 24 patients of anterior shoulder instability treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair in 16 cases and open Bankart repair in 8 cases. Average age was 26 years old and involved in dominant arm in 15 cases. Patients were suffered instability for 3.1 years before operation and mean follow-up was 2 year 9 months ( 1 you 9 months -4year 10 months). Results : Post operative pain was subsided in 2 weeks in arthroscopic surgery and 3 weeks in open surgery. The final range of motion after arthroscopic repair were flekion in 168" , external rotation in 54" , and internal rotation in 79, and after open repair 168" ,49" , and 78 respectively. In arthroscopic surgery,2 cases (13%) were redislocated, and 4 cases(25%) showed mild instability. In open case,1 case (11%) showed mild instability. According to function- al result by Rowe grading scale, satisfactory results were 12case (76%) in arthroscopic repair and 7 cases (88%) in open cases. Conclusions Both arthroscopic or open Bankart could get good results in the treatment of anterior instability of shoulder. In arthroscopic repair, perioperative morbidity was lower than open repair, but it needs careful rehabilitation program to prevent redislocation and to return to sports activity.

Clinical Results of the Arthroscopic "Multiple Pulled Suture" Technique for Large or Comminuted Bony Bankart Lesion

  • Lee, Byung-Ill;Kim, Byoung-Min;Kho, Duk-Hwan;Kim, Hyeung-June
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • 제20권3호
    • /
    • pp.138-146
    • /
    • 2017
  • Background: Arthroscopic fixations for large and comminuted bony Bankart lesions are technically difficult. We developed an arthroscopic multiple pulled suture (MPS) technique to restore large and comminuted bony Bankart lesions. Methods: Ten patients (mean age, 49.8 years; range, 31-79 years) underwent bony Bankart repair using the illustrated MPS technique and were then followed for a mean of 27.3 months. A plain radiograph series and three-dimensional computed tomography scans were taken at the initial clinical evaluation and 3 months postoperatively. Outcome measurements included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and subjective patient satisfaction, along with surgical complications. Results: Union of an osseous fragment with the glenoid rim was confirmed in all patients on a computed tomography scan 3 months after operation. The osseous fragment was restored to proper articular congruence and reduction. The affected shoulder was stable in nine of the 10 patients. One patient presented with a redislocation after a sports injury 3 years postoperatively. The ASES, Rowe, and UCLA scores improved at the final evaluation, and median patient satisfaction at the final follow-up was 9 of 10 points (range, 6-10 points). Conclusions: The arthroscopic MPS technique for bony Bankart lesions with large or comminuted osseous fragments was a relatively easy and safe method for stable fixation of the osseous fragment. Therefore, the arthroscopic MPS technique resulted in good restoration of stability with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates.

관절경적 Bankart 봉합술후 적극적 재활치료 - 전향적 임상연구 - (Accelerated Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study -)

  • 김승호;하권익;정민욱;임문섭;김영민;박종혁;조양범
    • 대한정형외과스포츠의학회지
    • /
    • 제1권1호
    • /
    • pp.79-88
    • /
    • 2002
  • 목적 : 관절경적Bankart 봉합술후조기운동과일반적인고정법의임상결과를전향적방법으로비교하고자하였다. 대상및방법 : 외상성재발성전방불안정성이있는62명의환자를대상으로봉합나사를이용하여관절경적 Bankart 봉합술을시행후, 2개의무작위그룹으로분류하였다. 그룹1(28명, 평균나이28세)은3주동안고정한뒤고식적인재활운동을시작하였고그룹2(34명, 평균나이29세)는단계적인관절운동및근력강화운동으로구성된적극적재활운동을수술다음날부터시작하였다. 환자선택의기준은재발성불안정성이있으며전형적인Bankart 병변을가진비운동선수를대상으로하였으며평균31개월동안추시관찰하였다. 결과는통증점수, 관절운동범위, 일상생활로의회복, 재발율, 각재활프로그램에대한환자의만족도그리고shoulder score (ASES, UCLA and Rowe)를분석하였다. 결과 : 두그룹간재발율의차이는없었으며, 어느그룹에서도재발성탈구는나타나지않았다. 각각의그룹에서2명의환자에서전방불안유발검사에서양성소견을나타냈다. 적극적재활치료를한환자는기능적관절운동이더빨랐으며활동의기능적인면에서도더빨리회복되었다. 적극적재활치료를한경우에는술후통증은감소하였고, 재활프로그램에만족하고있으나shoulder scores, 일상생활로의복귀, 통증점수그리고관절운동범위는최종추시시, 두그룹간차이는없었다.결론 : 조기재활은관절경적Bankart 봉합술후선택적환자군에서재발율은증가하지않았다. 두그룹간최종결과는동일하였지만적극적재활운동은기능적회복을촉진하고술후통증을감소시켜일상생활로의빠른복귀가가능하였다.

  • PDF

비매듭 금속 봉합 나사못을 이용한 관절경적 방카트 복원술: 임상적 및 방사선학적 결과의 비교 (Clinical & Radiologic Result of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using Knotless Suture Anchor)

  • 오정환;이상훈;박홍근;전숙하;박준석;김철기;박진영
    • 대한정형외과스포츠의학회지
    • /
    • 제7권2호
    • /
    • pp.135-141
    • /
    • 2008
  • 목적: 비매듭 금속 봉합 나사못(knotless metal suture anchor)을 이용한 관절경적 방카트(Bankart) 복원술의 임상적 및 방사선학적 결과를 비교하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2001년 2월부터 2005년 1월까지 비매듭 봉합 나사못을 이용하여 관절경적 방카트 복원술을 시행하였고 1년 이상 추시 가능했던 68예를 대상으로 하였다. 술 후 평균 추시 기간은 34개월이었다. 평가는 Rowe score, 관절 운동 범위, 주관적 시각 척도(VAS)에 의한 통증 정도를 측정하였으며 수술 전 후 방사선학적 결과와 비교하였다. 결과: Rowe scoring system에서 술 전 43.3에서 술 후 95.6로 평가되었다. 관절운동범위는 최종 추시시 정상 팔에 비해서 거의 차이는 없었다. 주관적 시각 척도에 의한 통증의 정도는 술 전 3.3에서 술 후 0.5로 측정되었다. 방사성 저음영선은 약 15예에서 관찰되었다. 15예 중 2예에서 재탈구 및 나사못 관절병증으로 재수술을 시행하였고 Odds Ratio상 2.6배의 견관절 불안정성을 호소하였다. 결론: 비매듭 봉합 나사못을 이용한 방카트 복원술은 유용한 방법이나 외래 추시 중 나타나는 나사못 주위의 방사성 저음영선은 불량한 예후를 암시할 수 있기 때문에 주의가 필요하겠다.

  • PDF

견관절 불안정성의 관절경적 치료에 있어 Beach chair position의 유용성 (The Usefulness of Beach-chair position in the Arthroscopic Treatment of Shoulder Instability)

  • 최창혁;신민철
    • Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
    • /
    • 제5권2호
    • /
    • pp.118-123
    • /
    • 2002
  • Purpose: The purpose was to identify the effectiveness of beach-chair position in the arthroscopic Bankart repair over conventional lateral decubitus position with distal traction. Materials & Methods: 36 arthroscopic Bankart repair through July 2000 to July 2001 was done under beach chair position. All cases were shoulder instability. Male patients were 6 and female were 4 with average age of 25 years. Arthroscopic suture anchor was used in 24 cases and average number was 3. Results: Interscalene block was tried in 29 patients and 1 case was changed to general anesthesia. Arthroscopic examination to identify Bankart lesion and associated pathology was done without difficulty Bankart lesions were easily reduced to anatomic position and placed suture anchor and hooking approprately. After the arthroscopic examination,3 cases were converted to open procedure without any positional change. Conclusion: Under interscalene block, the preparation was more simple and the patient could watch arthroscopic procedure with confidence. There was no hindrance in arthroscopic examination and arthroscopic repair could be dont: in more anatomic position. It can be easily changed to open repair if it needed