• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.47-64
• /
• 2015

Pursuant to Article 109(1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act of Korea, a person, not an attorney-at-law, who receives or promises to receive money, articles, entertainment or other benefits or who gives or promises to give those things to a third party, in compensation for providing or mediating legal services, such as examination, representation, arbitration(emphasis added), settlement, solicitation, legal consultation, making of legal documents, etc. shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than 7 years or by a fine not exceeding KRW 50 million or may be punished by both and there is no specific provision on qualification of arbitrator except on nationality of an arbitrator in the Arbitration Act of Korea. Then, the question arises, can any non-lawyer arbitrator who receives arbitrator's fees be punished in accordance with the Attorney-at-Law Act in Korea? To search for an answer for this matter, this paper examines the Arbitration Act or the Civil Procedure Code of 33 major countries in the world and explains a research on the participation ratio of non-lawyer arbitrators in all 360 arbitration cases registered in 2012 at the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB).

• 한국게임학회 논문지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.13-24
• /
• 2021

최근 이스포츠법 개정안이 발의되었다. 본 연구는 이스포츠 산업의 특성으로 높은 접근성, 종목 불안정, 낮은 직업안정성, 치열한 경쟁, 정책적 지원 미흡을 도출하고, 이를 바탕으로 개정안을 분석하였다. 이스포츠법 개정안은 지역 이스포츠와 이스포츠 단체 및 선수를 지원할 근거를 마련한 의의가 있으나, 정책 시행을 위한 행정력에 대한 고려가 부족하고 선언적인 내용을 담고 있는 한계가 있다. 본 연구는 이를 개선하기 위한 방안으로 분쟁조정 대상 확대, 스포츠산업진흥법의 제도 도입, 사문화된 규정 시행, 이스포츠 선수의 직업안정성 향상을 제시하였다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.165-174
• /
• 2023

4차 산업 혁명으로 인해 우리 사회 전 영역에 걸쳐 적용되는 영향력은 날이 갈수록 빠른 속도로 발전을 거듭하고 있다. 최근 법률서비스 분야에서도 선진국 미국을 중심으로 인공지능 기술을 도입하여 법률시장의 혁신을 주도하고 있다. 이처럼 인공지능은 빠른 속도로 사람들의 보조역할을 떠나 사람들을 대체하는 수단으로 급성장할 것이 전망되는 가운데 우리나라 전문 법조인들이 이런 법률시장에서 생존하기 위한 필요한 방안을 검토함이 본 연구의 목적이다. 연구를 위해 국내 연구자들의 선행연구와 우리나라 각종 자료를 기반으로 분석한 후, 비변호사의 법률사무 취급을 전면 금지하는 변호사법 개정, 공공정보에 해당하는 판례에 대해 국가의 적극적인 개입, 법률 정보 서비스의 독점 문제 해결을 위한 국가와 민간이 서로 견제할 수 있는 방안을 도출하여 제시했다. 따라서 상기 연구는 향후 인공지능을 활용한 법률서비스 측면에서 많은 논의점을 던져 줄 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제14권12호
• /
• pp.607-617
• /
• 2014

본 연구는 영화 <변호인>을 텍스트로 사용하여 그 속에 들어있는 학제가 무엇인지 서술하고, 그 서술에 따라 어떻게 통섭하여 교육할 것인지를 연구하고자 한 것이다. <변호인>을 텍스트로 정한 이유는 이 영화가 허구라고 하지만 역사적 사실에 근거한 내용이라는 것과 한때 대통령이었던 노무현을 주인공으로 설정하여 국민적 관심이 있는 영화라는 것, 그리고 재판의 과정을 통해 양심과 법, 도덕의 가치를 각자가 판단할 수 있게 한다는 것과 역사적, 정치적 상황을 통해 역사와 정치를 알 수 있게 하며, 영화 속 주요 인물들의 분석을 통해 현 사회의 다양한 군상들에 대해 담론할 수 있게 한다는 것 등이다. 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 영화 <변호인>의 서사 분석을 통해 문학(국어)을 교육할 수 있다. 영화는 실화를 바탕으로 한 픽션으로 정치와 권력, 소시민, 혹은 약자의 아픔과 분노, 그리고 정의감 등을 법정 이야기로 엮어 흥미롭게 진행됨으로 이를 통해 문학적 소양을 쌓을 수 있다. 둘째, 역사와 정치에 관한 교육을 할 수 있다. 영화는 정치적 알레고리를 담론으로 그 당시 역사적 상황과 함께 전개됨으로 이를 통해 정치와 역사에 대한 공부를 할 수 있다. 셋째, 법과 도덕에 관한 교육을 할 수 있다. 이데올로기적 상황을 기점으로 그에 타당한 법과 도덕을 담론으로 형성하여 교육할 수 있다. 넷째, 영화 속 주요 인물들의 분석을 통해 작품분석에 관한 교육을 할 수 있다. 인물분석은 현재 우리 사회의 구성원인 사람들이 살아가는 모습을 반영하고, 인간관계나 삶의 질을 결정함으로 이를 통해 올바른 인간관을 교육할 수 있다.

• 대한디지털의료영상학회논문지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.11-16
• /
• 2008

Images of medical treatment on PACS environment are digitized and they make saving and transmission of patient's information easy with CD format causing increase of patients transfer rate between hospital and data transmission as well. Figuring out the configuration of confining status of copied images of medical treatment with CD format and present the appropriate way of identification for personal information. 20 general hospital over 500 beds which are utilizing PACS currently. Questionnaire investigation focusing on PACS operation center and it's management people. In accordance with the law of securing personal information of public organizations, it says "Anyone who wants to see his or her information via representative he or she needs to make a letter of attorney and turn in this to the president of it's possessing facility" in the article 16. Based on the investigation of general hospital for CD copy issue status near metropolitan area, 8 out of 20, were issuing CD copy through personal identification process(the person oneself and representative) and 10 general hospital were doing by getting signature of receiptor only without identification of the person oneself and 2 general hospital confirmation process is not at all. By the law of securing personal information of public organization, article 16, confirmation process is supposed to mandate lawfully with a letter of attorney when there is any request of reading and/or copies of one's information. But in reality, there were no consistent rules on reading, the process and coverage of copy issue, rejection coverage of copy issue of CD copy in each general hospital PACS operation center. Therefore there is a big need for consolidated format which is applicable by law when the representative requests to issue of CD copy that is storing medical treatment images. By issue through this consolidated format, securing medical information of individual and systemic operation and management will be valid and effective.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.55-76
• /
• 2013

This study aims to analyze the main features of Mongolian arbitration system compared with Korean Arbitration Law which was revised under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Model Law. On the basis of this comparative study, certain differences are suggested: First, the environment of Mongolian arbitration is still insufficient in terms of its operation and usage at the international level. Second, the Mongol National Arbitration Court has established Ad-hoc Arbitration Rules and has promoted Ad-hoc Arbitration although it is an institutional arbitration organization. Third, the arbitration objects are defined as the types of tangible and intangible assets in Mongolia which are different from those of the Korean Arbitration Law. Accordingly, court and officer disputes, family disputes, labor-management relations, and criminal matters are covered by the arbitration objects. Fourth, Mongol Arbitration Law specifies the following persons disqualified for arbitrator appointment: the member of the Constitutional Court, judge, procurator, inquiry officer, investigator, court decision enforcement officer, attorney, or notary who has previously rendered legal service to any party of the disputes, and any officials who are prohibited by laws to be engaged in positions above the scope of their duties. Fifth, the arbitrator selection and appointment criteria should be documented, and the arbitrator should have the ability to resolve the disputes independently and fairly and achieve concord from both parties. Sixth, if there is no agreement between the parties, the arbitration language should be Mongolian, and the arbitral tribunal has no power to decide on it. Seventh, despite the agreement for a documentary hearing between the parties, there should be provided opportunities for an oral hearing if either of the parties requires it. Eighth, if the parties do not understand the language of the arbitration, the parties can directly ask the translation service. They should also keep secrets in the process of arbitration. Ninth, the cancellation of arbitral award is allowed by the application of the parties, not by the authority of the court. Except for the nine differences above, the Mongolian arbitration system is similar to that of the Korean Arbitration Law. This paper serves to contribute to the furtherance in trade relationship between Mongolia and Korea after the rapid and efficient resolution of disputes.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.269-308
• /
• 2008

The contemporary age is a period of PR for the self. Regardless of how good the quality of goods or services offered is, if it is not made known to the buyers, a sell is impossible. As a result, the contemporary man is flooded with advertisements and is living in a time of over-saturated information. This is not much different in the medical services sector, as it too is experiencing an overflow of information due to the expansion of advertisement approaches to include not only the previous positive-method, but also the negative-method. In tandem, recent advancements in electronics and information technology has made possible a rapid increase in then number of internet advertisements. However, outmoded medical law, which was created to regulate newspapers and billboards, is still being applied to regulate today's modem medical advertisements. At the same time, collateral ordinances such as "corrective statutes for signs and advertisements" are not sufficient in providing the necessary regulatory countermeasures. In the midst of all this, as IPTV is scheduled to be broadcast nationwide starting next year, and with the market for search advertisements and internet advertisements annually growing at a rapid pace, it has become evermore urgent to come up with an adequate regulatory measure. Consequently, it is necessary to look into the possibility of restricting the medium and content of internet medical advertisements as well as realistic schemes for its realization. In particular, regulatory measures that take into consideration the special characteristics of internet advertisements should be found, and the necessity of an prior deliberation procedure and the likelihood of introducing a certification system should be examined.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.99-123
• /
• 2018

Korean businesses engaging in transactions with U.S. entities are increasingly favoring arbitration clauses to address unexpected disputes. How best ought the parties' arbitration contractual terms be drafted to avoid lengthy, protracted and expensive legal disputes? Authors examine the public policy favoring arbitration through the U.S. Federal Arbitration Act. Korean litigants seeking a "Motion to Compel Arbitration" rely on arbitration clauses designed to address four factors U.S. courts use to evaluate the enforceability of arbitration contract clauses. What role does U.S. state court jurisdiction hinder or help Korean businesses contracting with U.S. business entities located within certain boundaries? What is the effect of an arbitration clause that designates the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board in Seoul to arbitrate? All cases analyzed entail Korean business entities. Eleven cases demonstrate the results of seeking motions to compel arbitration in U.S. courts. Three cases illustrate motions to compel arbitration drafted to use the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board in Seoul. The results provide Korean businesses and legal practitioners insight into addressing the specific goals of including contractual arbitration clauses to enhance their international commercial interests in the United States.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제51권
• /
• pp.133-158
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to analyze one of CIETEC(China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission) Award on the dispute arising from Cotton Sale Contact which deals with damages and reduction of the price. Especially this case focused on the effect of reduction of the price to damages. The purpose of damages is to place the aggrieved party in as good a position as if the other party had properly performed the contract. So court costs and attorney's fee should be regarded as the loss, because these are caused by consequence of the breach which is recoverable. With the same reason, overpaid taxes should also regard as the loss. It is not impossible, however, to claim both damages and reduction of the price for same loss at the same time. It means buyer could not claim damages for the same loss, once he already claimed reduction of the price. So Korean companies should consider which remedy is proper to himself under the circumstances. He should choose reduction of the price when market price is down. In case of rising market price, he should consider follows: first, it is better to choose damages based on current price(Art.76), if upswing of non-conformity price is higher then upswing of market price. Second, it is better to choose general rule for measuring damages(Art.74), if upswing of market price is higher then upswing of non-conformity price.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.3-35
• /
• 2017

우리나라에서는 1979년 대법원이 처음 설명의무 위반으로 인한 손해배상을 인정하였고, 그 후 판례를 통해서 설명의무의 구체적 내용이 형성 발전되어 오고 있다. 의사의 설명의무는 헌법 제10조와 진료계약상의 의무에 근거하고 있고, 보건의료기본법 제12조 및 개별 법률에서도 설명의무에 관한 내용을 규정하고 있다. 그런데, 2016. 12. 20. 개정된 의료법 제24조의2에 설명의무에 관한 규정이 신설되었고, 개정 의료법은 2017. 6. 21.부터 시행될 예정이다. 개정 의료법에 따르면, 설명의무의 대상이 되는 의료행위는 '사람의 생명 또는 신체에 중대한 위해를 발생하게 할 우려가 있는 수술, 수혈, 전신마취'이다. 이러한 의료행위를 할 때에는 반드시 사전에 법정사항이 기재된 서면으로 설명을 하고 동의를 받아야 한다. 만약, 이를 위반하면 300만원 이하의 과태료 처분을 받게 된다. 개정 의료법의 내용과 학설 및 판례를 통해서 인정되어 온 설명의무에 관한 기존 법리를 비교 검토해 보면, 양자 간에 상당한 차이가 있음을 확인할 수 있다. 그에 따라 개정의료법의 시행 이후에도, 기존 설명의무에 관한 법리는 크게 영향을 받지 않을 것으로 보인다. 그러나, 동일한 사안에서 설명의무 위반 여부에 관한 판단이 민사상 손해배상사건과 의료법 위반으로 인한 과태료처분사건에서 서로 달라지는 것은 법적 안정성이나 법질서 전체 통일의 관점에서 바람직하지 않다. 개정 의료법상의 설명의무에 관한 내용을 기존 법리에 맞게 수정하거나 독일의 경우와 같이 진료계약의 내용에 포함시켜 민법에서 규율하는 것이 바람직하다고 생각한다.