• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.64-72
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study is to develop a system dynamics model for the assessment of the organizational and human factors in a nuclear power plant which contribute to nuclear safety. Previous studies can be classified into two major approaches. One is the engineering approach using tools such as ergonomics and Probability Safety Assessment (PSA). The other is the socio-psychology approach. Both have contributed to find organizational and human factors and to present guidelines to lessen human error in plants. However, since these approaches assume that the relationship among factors is independent they do not explain the interactions among the factors or variables in Nuclear Power Plants. To overcome these restrictions, a system dynamics model, which can show cause and effect relationships among factors and quantify the organizational and human factors, has been developed. Handling variables such as the degree of leadership, the number of employees, and workload in each department, users can simulate various situations in nuclear power plant organization. Through simulation, users can get insights to improve safety in plants and to find managerial tools in both organizational and human factors.

• 한국실천공학교육학회논문지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.25-29
• /
• 2009

공학교육에 있어 학생들의 학습성과에 대한 평가는 교육프로그램에 대한 분석과 개선을 위한 필수적인 활동이다. 프로그램 학습성과는 공학을 전공한 학생들이 전공프로그램을 다 마치고 졸업할 때에 지녀야할 기본적인 능력을 말하는 것으로 대학 4년 동안 학생의 입장에서 무엇을 통해, 언제, 어떻게 학습성과를 달성하였는지를 평가하고 분석해야한다. 학습성과를 평가하는데 있어서 두 가지의 중요한 사항이 있다. 첫 번째는 학생들의 학습성과 성취도를 보다 정확히 평가해야한다는 점이다. 다른 면에서는 학습성과 평가의 방법의 수월성이 높아야한다는 점이다. 본 논문에서는 학습성과의 성취도 평가를 위한 평가도구를 제안하고 평가방법에 대한 사례를 소개하였다. 제안된 평가방법은 평가의 두 가지 중요 요소인 신뢰성과 수월성을 높일 수 있도록 설계되었다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.35-51
• /
• 2003

This study purports to develop a quality assessment tool for the process of health promotion programs at public health centers(PHC). The draft of the assessment tool developed by the literature was distributed to 242 staffs who were in charge of the health promotion programs at PHCs for evaluating the feasibility of the tool on September and October 2002. The major results of the study were as follows; The quality assessment tool developed in the study consisted of four domains: strategic planning, program management, monitoring and evaluation, and resources and information. The strategic planning dealt with the function of the planning staff and committees, community data analysis, the feasibility of the program, and the approach methods for attaining the goal of the program. The program management included the items on the qualification and power of the program staff. The monitoring and evaluation included the items on the reporting and communication among program units, and feed back after monitoring. Finally, the resources and information dealt with community networking, clients' response, and consulting activity of the staff. The validity of the tools was tested and partly supported by both formative and criterion-related methods. The assessment tools developed in this study could be used by health promotion workers in the self-evaluation of the program quality. In conclusion, the quality assessment tool developed in the study will be a good safeguard for assuring the quality of the process of health promotion programs.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제14권6호
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2011

Professional communication skills in writing and speaking with multiple and complex audiences are required to engineers in society of modern technology. In this paper, we proposed the effective assessment system for the Program Outcomes on the communication skill competence(PO7), which is one of the 12 program outcomes stipulated by ABEEK (Accreditation Board for Engineering Education of Korea). To ensure logical connectivity of the assessment system, we carefully selected the performance criteria by defining the core concept of "written communication" and "verbal communication". Based on the selected performance criteria, the whole process of creating assessment tools and rubrics was explained in detail. It can be expected that the assessment for the Program Outcomes on the communication skill competence would be more systematic by using the proposed assessment system.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권9호
• /
• pp.257-269
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 다양한 건강상태에 놓여 있는 노인들의 성공노화를 실현하기 위한 통합적인 건강서비스 제공의 근간이 되는 포괄적 노인평가 패키지를 개발하기 위한 목적으로 시행된 방법론적 연구이다. 노인평가도구들에 대한 임상 및 지역사회에서의 사용 실례와 관련문헌 고찰을 통해, 총 9개 평가 영역으로 나누어 관련 평가항목과 평가도구들을 1차적으로 선정하였다. 이후 관련 전문가 3인의 자문 결과와 노인 15명을 대상으로 한 예비조사 실시 결과를 토대로 포괄적 노인평가의 영역과 항목들을 수정 보완하였다. 최종적으로 기본평가, 정신기능평가, 신체기능평가, 생활습관평가, 주관적 건강수준평가, 환경평가로 이루어진 6개의 평가영역에서 각 해당 항목의 수행지침이 포함된 29개 평가항목으로 구성된 포괄적 노인평가 패키지가 구축되었다.

• 임상간호연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.5-23
• /
• 2010

Purpose: This study was conducted to determine the validity and reliability of performance measurement tools based on the nursing process for prevention and management of pressure ulcers, falls and pain. Methods: The performance measurement tools were reviewed by a panel of experts and refined on the basis of the panel's suggestions. The validity of the performance measurement tools was measured by surveying hospital nurses. The reliability of these tools was tested by having nursing experts use the tools in five nursing units to assess nursing performance in prevention and management of pressure ulcers, falls and pain. Results: The performance measurement tools in this study were found to be acceptable as tools to evaluate quality of nursing care in pressure ulcers, falls and pain. The reliability of the performance measurement tools was acceptable. Conclusion: These results indicate that the performance measurement tools developed in this study are valid and reliable instruments to monitor and improve quality of nursing care in prevention and management of pressure ulcers, falls and pain.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권11호
• /
• pp.5229-5237
• /
• 2012

작업치료사의 환자중심훈련(patient-centered practice)은 치료사에게 환자와 그 가족의 관점에서 능동적으로 환자의 기능부전을 찾아야 가능하다. 본 연구는 신경계 작업치료사가 검사 및 평가를 실시하기 위하여 현재 임상에서 사용하는 평가도구의 사용빈도 및 평가도구 선택시 고려사항을 알아보고, 평가에 관한 향후 방향을 제시하기 위함이었다. 연구대상자는 신경계 질환자를 대상으로 치료하는 서울 경기지역에 근무하는 작업치료사 66명이었다. 설문지는 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성, 평가관련 정보, 신경계 작업치료사가 사용하는 평가도구의 내용, 성인 평가도구 및 아동평가도구에 관한 내용으로 구성되었다. 결과분석은 설문에 응답한 66명의 자료를 대상으로 기술적 통계량을 사용하였다. 연구결과, 1일 환자 수는 10인 이상 15인 미만이 가장 많았으며, 초기평가는 20분 이상 40분 미만이 가장 많았고, 환자 재평가 주기는 1개월과 기능적 차이가 보일 때가 가장 많았다. 평가도구는 신경계 관련 도구에만 국한되지 않았으며, 평가도구 선택시 고려사항은 평가도구의 신뢰도와 타당도가 가장 높았다. 성인을 대상으로 사용한 평가도구는 '상지운동기능'은 JHFT, '인지 및 지각'은 MMSE-K, '일상생활동작'은 MBI, '작업수행'은 COPM이 가장 많았다. 또한 아동을 대상으로 한 평가도구는 '인지-지각 평가도구'는 MVPT, '일상생활동작 평가도구'는 Wee-FIM이 가장 많았다. 마지막으로 영역에 따른 평가도구 선택시 고려사항도 평가도구의 신뢰도와 타당도가 가장 높았다. 본 연구결과를 통하여 서울.경기지역에 근무하는 신경계 작업치료사의 영역별 평가도구의 사용빈도와 그 평가도구를 선택할 때 고려하는 사항을 알아볼 수 있었고, 이 결과를 바탕으로 향후 신경계 작업치료사가 평가를 수행할 때 환자수행중심 평가뿐만 아니라 환자와 보호자의 관점을 통합하여 치료계획을 수립할 필요성이 있다고 제언하는 바이다.

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.15-31
• /
• 2016

Objectives : The aim of this study is to review the instruments used to assess patient condition and the effects of Korean medical treatment for patients injured in traffic accidents in clinical studies in the Korean medical field published in South Korea. Methods : A literature study was performed, and clinical studies on patients injured in traffic accidents visiting Korean medical clinics or hospitals were examined. Data about chief complaints, tools used to assess either patients' condition or the effectiveness of Korean medical treatment, and time point of assessment were extracted. The studies were classified according to symptom. The use-frequency and the parent category of the assessment tools were also analyzed. Results : 78 studies were selected and classified into 5 categories based on the chief complaints, neck pain, lower back pain, headache, psychological symptoms and unspecified symptoms. Various scales were used to report the patient's pain severity, and functional or psychological status resulting from traffic accidents. Pain index, in particular VAS, was most frequently used and a few mechanical instruments and Korean medicinal assessment tools were mentioned. Conclusion : Most instruments used in Korean medicine clinical studies on patients injured in traffic accidents are self-reported tools. To assess both the patient's condition precisely and the effectiveness of Korean medical treatment on patients injured in traffic accidents, more appropriate and unified tools should be designed that consider pain, functional disability, psychological status and objective assessments measured by devices together.

• Journal of Acupuncture Research
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.51-64
• /
• 2010

Objectives : To introduce and compare various headache measurement tools, in order to provide fundamental information for future clinical trials and development of oriental medicine measurement tools. Methods : Eight headache assessment scales, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire(MQoLQ), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life(MSQOL), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire(MSQ), The Headache Impact Questionnaire(HImQ), Headcahe Needs Assessment Survey(HANA), Henry Ford Headache disability Inventory(HDI), Migraine Disablity Assessment Scale(MIDAS) and Headache Impact Test(HIT-6), were searched through Pubmed. General character, the process of development, verification of reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness to patient's change and validity were reviewed. Results : In assessing the quality of life of migraine patients, MQoLQ can be used to measure the change within 24 hours, MSQ and MSQOL can be used to measure the change during a relatively longer period of time. The frequency and bothersomeness of headache can be easily measured by HANA. HImQ can be used to measure the intensity of headache and the influence on normal daily activities. HDI can measure the emotional difficulties of headache patients. HIT-6 and MIDAS makes measurements possible in a short period of time, and the reliability and validity have been verified numerously. HIT-6 and MIDAS are the most frequently used measurement tools because they are simple and easy for both the assessor and the patient to understand and use. Conclusions : In this study, various headache assessment tools have been reviewed. The assessed tools were widely used after being verified for their reliability and validity. We hope this study provides fundamental information in establishing future clinical trial and clinical practice guidelines. We also hope this study to contribute to the development of an oriental medicine assessment tool for headache.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제45권6호
• /
• pp.783-801
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the various measures available for assessment of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXLIPN) and to evaluate the measurement properties of each assessment tool. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify existing measures for OXLIPN found in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, RISS and KoreaMed. The quality of the 24 identified tools was evaluated based on their properties of measurement including content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, responsiveness, floor-ceiling effects and interpretability. Results: Ten (41.7%) of the 24 tools were identified as specific measures for assessing OXLIPN and the most popular type of measures were clinical grading systems by clinicians (58.3%) and only 29.2% of measures were identified as patient reported outcomes. The most frequently used tool was National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC), but the validity of NCI-CTC has not been reported appropriately. Overall, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) received the best psychometric scores, and the Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool (CIPNAT) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynaecologic Oncology Group-neurotoxicity-12 (FACT/GOG-Ntx-12) followed NPSI. Conclusion: To select appropriate measure, evidences should be accumulated through the clinical use of tools. Therefore, practitioner and researchers are urged to report relevant statistics required for the validation of the currently used measures for assessment of OXLIPN.