Browse > Article

Review Study of Headache Measurement Tools - Mainly on Reliability and Validity -  

Kim, Eun-Jung (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Graduate School of Oriental Medicine, Dongguk Univ-Seoul)
Jung, Chan-Yung (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Graduate School of Oriental Medicine, Dongguk Univ-Seoul)
Jang, Min-Gee (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Graduate School of Oriental Medicine, Dongguk Univ-Seoul)
Yoon, Eun-Hye (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Graduate School of Oriental Medicine, Dongguk Univ-Seoul)
Nam, Dong-Woo (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Kang, Jung-Won (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Jae-Dong (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Seung-Deok (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Graduate School of Oriental Medicine, Dongguk Univ-Seoul)
Kim, Kap-Sung (Dept. of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Graduate School of Oriental Medicine, Dongguk Univ-Seoul)
Publication Information
Journal of Acupuncture Research / v.27, no.1, 2010 , pp. 51-64 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives : To introduce and compare various headache measurement tools, in order to provide fundamental information for future clinical trials and development of oriental medicine measurement tools. Methods : Eight headache assessment scales, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire(MQoLQ), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life(MSQOL), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire(MSQ), The Headache Impact Questionnaire(HImQ), Headcahe Needs Assessment Survey(HANA), Henry Ford Headache disability Inventory(HDI), Migraine Disablity Assessment Scale(MIDAS) and Headache Impact Test(HIT-6), were searched through Pubmed. General character, the process of development, verification of reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness to patient's change and validity were reviewed. Results : In assessing the quality of life of migraine patients, MQoLQ can be used to measure the change within 24 hours, MSQ and MSQOL can be used to measure the change during a relatively longer period of time. The frequency and bothersomeness of headache can be easily measured by HANA. HImQ can be used to measure the intensity of headache and the influence on normal daily activities. HDI can measure the emotional difficulties of headache patients. HIT-6 and MIDAS makes measurements possible in a short period of time, and the reliability and validity have been verified numerously. HIT-6 and MIDAS are the most frequently used measurement tools because they are simple and easy for both the assessor and the patient to understand and use. Conclusions : In this study, various headache assessment tools have been reviewed. The assessed tools were widely used after being verified for their reliability and validity. We hope this study provides fundamental information in establishing future clinical trial and clinical practice guidelines. We also hope this study to contribute to the development of an oriental medicine assessment tool for headache.
Keywords
Headache; Migraine; Measurement; Tool; Scale; Reliability; Validity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Holmes WF et al. Information about migraine disability influences physicians' perceptions of illness severity and treatment needs. Headache. 2001 ; 41(4) : 343-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Santanello NC et al. Validation of a new quality of life questionnaire for acute migraine headache. Headache. 1995 ; 35(6) : 330-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Wagner TH et al. A new instrument to assess the long-term quality of life effects from migraine : development and psychometric testing of the MSQOL. Headache. 1996 ; 36(8) : 484-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Bauer B et al. Psychosocial handicap due to chronic headaches. Evaluation of the inventory of Disabilities caused by Headache. Nervenarzt. 1999 ; 70(6) : 522-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Gandek B et al. Translating the Short-Form Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in 27 countries : methodological and conceptual issues. Qual Life Res. 2003 ; 12(8) : 975-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 French DJ et al. Perceived self-efficacy and headache-related disability. Headache. 2000 ; 40(8) : 647-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Stevens SS. On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. Science. 1946 ; 103(2684) : 677-80.   DOI
8 Niere K and A Quin. Development of a headachespecific disability questionnaire for patients attending physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2009 ; 14(1) : 45-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Patrick DL, BC Hurst and J Hughes. Further development and testing of the migraine-specific quality of life(MSQOL) measure. Headache. 2000 ; 40(7) : 550-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 네이버 백과사전. Available from : URL : http://100.naver.com/100.nhn? docid=145472.
11 문희수, 정진상, 이혜승, 박혜선, 김선우, 우행원. 한국인 편두통 환자에서 MSQoL(Migraine-Specific Quality of Life) 설문조사의 신뢰도 및 타당도. 대한신경과학회지. 2003 ; 21(2) : 146-55.
12 Shin HE et al. Headache Impact Test-6(HIT- 6) Scores for Migraine Patients : Their Relation to Disability as Measured from a Headache Diary. J Clin Neurol. 2008 ; 4(4) : 158-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Muller U et al. Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I : validation. Eur Spine J. 2004 ; 13(4) : 301-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hansen JS, L Bendtsen and R Jensen. Psychometric properties of the Danish versions of headache-specific locus of control scale and headache management self-efficacy scale. J Headache Pain. 2009 ; 10(5) : 341-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Lipton RB et al. Validity and reliability of the Migraine-Treatment Optimization Questionnaire. Cephalalgia. 2009 ; 29(7) : 751-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kosinski M et al. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact : the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003 ; 12(8) : 963-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Patrick DL et al. Measuring satisfaction with migraine treatment : expectations, importance, outcomes, and global ratings. Clin Ther. 2003 ; 25(11) : 2920-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Chatterton ML et al. Reliability and validity of the migraine therapy assessment questionnaire. Headache. 2002 ; 42(10) : 1006-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Davis KH, L Black and B Sleath. Validation of the Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire. Value Health. 2002 ; 5(5) : 422-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Herndon RM. Handbook of neurologic rating scales. 2nd. USA : Demos Medical Publising. 2006 : 297-343.
21 Kenneth W, Lindsay IB. 이광우. 임상신경학. 3판. 서울 : 범문사. 2002 : 111.
22 Lipton RB et al. Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: the Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache. 2001 ; 41(9) : 854-61.
23 Pathak DS, DJ Chisolm and KA Weis. Functional Assessment in Migraine(FAIM) questionnaire : development of an instrument based upon the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Value Health. 2005 ; 8(5) : 591-600.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 주민경, 임형준, 주영수, 김주용, 김윤중, 유경호, 마효일, 이병철. 한국어판 두통영향 검사(Headache Impact Test-6)의 타당도 및 신뢰도 조사. 대한신경과학회지. 2009 ; 27(1) : 1-5.
25 Bayliss MS et al. A study of the feasibility of Internet administration of a computerized health survey : the headache impact test(HIT). Qual Life Res. 2003 ; 12(8) : 953-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Simon D, Lipton RB. Epidemiology of tension-type headache. JAMA. 1998 ; 279(5) : 381-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Jacobson GP et al. The Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI). Neurology. 1994 ; 44(5) : 837-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Stewart WF et al. An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) score. Neurology. 1999 ; 53(5) : 988-94.   DOI
29 Stewart WF et al. Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) score in comrison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain. 2000 ; 88(1) : 41-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Stewart WF et al. Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a populationbased sample of headache sufferers. Cephalalgia. 1999 ; 19(2) : 107-14 ; discussion 74.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Martin BC et al. Validity and reliability of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1). Headache. 2000 ; 40(3) : 204-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Sauro KM et al. HIT-6 and MIDAS as Measures of Headache Disability in a Headache Referral Population. Headache. 2009 : 1-13.
33 Bjorner JB, M Kosinski and JE Ware Jr, Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches : an application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT). Qual Life Res. 2003 ; 12(8) : 913-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 이혜승, 정진상, 송희정, 박혜선. 한국인 편두통 환자에서 MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) 설문조사의 신뢰도 및 타당성. 대한신경과학회지. 2000 ; 18(3) : 287-91.
35 Stewart WF, RB Lipton and K Kolodner. Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) Score : Relation to Headache Frequency, Pain Intensity, and Headache Symptoms. Headache : The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2003 ; 43(3) : 258-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Stewart WF et al. Validity of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain. 1999 ; 79(2-3) : 291-301.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Stewart WF et al. Reliability of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Cephalalgia. 1998 ; 18(1) : 44-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 McKenna SP, LC Doward and KM Davey. The Development and Psychometric Properties of the MSQOL : A Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument. Clin Drug Investig. 1998 ; 15(5) : 413-23.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Cramer JA, SD Silberstein and P Winner. Development and validation of the Headache Needs Assessment(HANA) survey. Headache. 2001 ; 41(4) : 402-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Jacobson GP et al. Headache disability inventory (HDI) : short-term test-retest reliability and spouse perceptions. Headache. 1995 ; 35(9) : 534-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Jhingran P et al. MSQ : Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Further investigation of the factor structure. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 ; 13(6) : 707-17.   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Cole JC, P Lin and MF Rupnow. Minimal important differences in the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) version. Cephalalgia. 2009 ; 29(11) : 1180-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Ohbu S et al. Development and testing of the Japanese version of the migraine-specific quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 2004 ; 13(8) : 1489-93.
44 Jhingran P et al. Development and validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Headache. 1998 ; 38(4) : 295-302.   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Passchier J et al. Evaluation of the Dutch version of the migraine quality of life instrument(MSQOL) and its application in headache coping. Cephalalgia. 2001 ; 21(8) : 823-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Stewart WF et al. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment(MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001 ; 56(6 Suppl 1) : S20-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
47 Hartmaier SL et al. Development of a brief 24-hour migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire. Headache. 1995 ; 35(6) : 320-9.   DOI   ScienceOn