• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.247-259
• /
• 1998

선행하중공법과 병행하여 연직배수재를 설치한 연약지반에서 초기에 신뢰성 있는 최종 침하량을 예측할 수 있는 방법을 확립하기 위하여, 실측자료를 이용한 역해석에 의해서 점증재하와 일시재하로 고려하여 Curve fitting 방법으로 역해석한 결과를 비교분석하고, 쌍곡선방법, Tan의 방법, Asaoka방법, Monden방법등으로 예측한 최종침하량과 비교하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 점증재하로 성토된 연약지반에 대해서 일시재하와 점증재하에 의한 예측 침하곡선이 일치하는 시간은 성토개시일로부터 성토기간의 약 2배 정도의 시간이 경과한 이후로 나타났다. 2 연직 드레인이 타입된 지반에 대해서 쌍곡선 방법, Tan의 방법, Asaoka방법, Monden방법, Curve fitting I, Curve fitting II(simple), 그리고 Curve fitting II(Carrillo)방법에 의하여 해석한 결과, Curve fitting II(simple) 방법을 기준으로할 때, 쌍곡선방법은 26~55%정도 과다추정되었고, Tan의 방법은 6~20%정도 과대 추정되었고, Monden방법은 Tan의 방법과 유사하게 나타났으며, Curve fitting I방법과 Asaoka방법은 최대 10%의 차이를 나타내었다. 3. 역해석에 의해서 최종침하량을 예측할 경우에 Asaoka 방법, 일시재하에 의한 Curve fitting I방법, 점증재하에 의한 Curve fitting II방법 등을 사용하는 것이 적합하다고 판단된다.

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.39-47
• /
• 2000

본 연구는 연약지반의 심도가 갚으면서 압밀침하량이 큰 지역에서 연직드레인 공법에 의하여 개량한 지반의 침하거동을 파악하고, 현장계측결과를 기초로 기존의 최종침하량의 예측방법과 현장계측치로부터 역산한 압축지수와 압밀계수의 범위를 실내시험과 비교분석 한 것으로 본 연구 대상지역에서 얻은 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 최종침하량 예측방법에 의하여 구한 최종예상침하량은 쌍곡선 방법이 가장 크고, Asaoka 방법과 Curve fitting 방법은 유사하게 나타났으며, 타입간격이 좁을 경우에는 교란영향을 고려한 설계가 검토되어야 할 것으로 판단된다. 2. 실측압밀도($U_m$)와 설계압밀도($U_t$)와의 관계는 쌍곡선 방법에서 $U_m$=(0.88~1.03)$U_t$으로 약간 작게 나타났고, Asaoka 방법은 $U_m$=(1.07~1.20)$U_t$, Curve fitting 방법은 $U_m$=(1.13~1.17)$U_t$으로 유사하게 나타났다. 3. 실내압축지수($V_{cclab}$)와 현장압축지수($Cc_{field}$)와의 관계는 쌍곡선 방법에서는 $Cc_{field}$=(1.26~1.45)$V_{cclab}$, Asaoka 방법에서는 $Cc_{field}$=(1.08~1.15)$V_{cclab}$, Curve fitting 방법에서는 $Cc_{field}$=(1.04~1.21)$V_{cclab}$의 범위로 쌍곡선방법에서는 약간 크게 나타났고, Asaoka와 Curve fitting 방법은 거의 동일한 값을 나타냈다. 4. 현장계측치로부터 역산한 현장압밀계수 ($C_h$)와 실내시험에서 구한 수직압밀계수($C_v$)와의 비는 ($C_h$/$C_v$) 쌍곡선방법에서는 0.7~0.9. Asaoka 방법에서는 0.9~1.5. Curve fitting 방법에서는 2.4~3.0의 범위로 나타났다. 5. 현장압밀계수는 방치기간이 경과함에 따라서 점차로 감소하는 경향을 나타내므로 압밀이 완료되었을 때에 최종침하량 예측방법에 의하여 재분석한 후 정확한 압밀계수를 산정하는 것이 합리적이라고 판단된다.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제45권5호
• /
• pp.140-150
• /
• 2003

Observational methods such as the Asaoka's method and the hyperbolic method are widely applied on the settlement analysis using observed settlement. The most unreliable aspects in those methods is arose from the subjective discretion of initial non-linearity on linear regression. The initial non-linearity is inevitable due to the settlement behaviour itself. Therefore an objective method is essential to achieve more reliable results on settlement analysis. It was found that the initial non-linear data are statistical outliers. New automation algorithms of the hyperbolic and the Asaoka's method were developed based on outlier detection method. The methods are a successive detection of outliers and a searching method of suitable hyperbolic range for the Asaoka's and the hyperbolic method respectively. Applicability of the algorithms was verified through case studies.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제42권
• /
• pp.68-77
• /
• 2000

Analyses, in which load was regarded as instant load and gradual step load, respectively, were performed with data measured on a gradually loaded field, and the results were inspected to find the effect of load conditions, and the final settlements which were predicted by Hyperbolic, Tan's, Asaoka's, and Monden's methods were compared with each other. Settlement curves in which load was regarded as instant load and gradual step load being to coincide at twice the time of duration of embankment. On the ground installed vertical drain, from the results of Hyperbolic, Tan's, Asaoka's, Monden's, Curve fitting I, and Curve fitting II (simple, carrillo) methods it was concluded that Asaoka, Curve fitting I, and Curve fitting II methods are reliable for prediction final settlement with back analysis.

• 한국농공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농공학회 1998년도 학술발표회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.425-430
• /
• 1998

The theory of consolidation has been achieved remarkable development, but associated properties are very difficult to determine in the laboratory. The theoretical shortcomings of those consolidation theories and uncertainties of associated properties make inevitably some discrepancy between theoretical and field settlements. Field settlement measurement by settlement plate is, therefore, widely used to overcome the discrepancy. Among the various methods of ultimate settlement predictions using field settlement data, hyperbolic method and Asaoka's method are most commonly used because of their simplicity and ability to give a reasonable estimate of consolidation settlement. In this paper, the applicability of hyperbolic method and Asaoka's method has been estimated by the analysis of the laboratory consolidation test and field measured data. It is shown that both hyperbolic method and Asaoka's method are significantly affected by the direction of drainage, and Asaoka's method is better to reflect the properties of the soft foundation than hyperbolic method.

• 한국지반환경공학회 논문집
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2012

본 연구에서는 연약지반 중 선행하중재하 공법을 적용한 6개 지역과 연직배수 공법을 적용한 6개 지역을 대상으로 압밀침하 특성을 비교하였다. Asaoka방법, 쌍곡선방법, Hoshino방법의 장래 예측 침하량 기법을 이용하여 압밀침하량을 예측하고, 실제 계측 침하량과 비교하였으며, 종합적으로 Asaoka방법에 의해 예측된 장래침하량이 쌍곡선방법이나 Hoshino방법에 비해 예측 정확도가 높게 평가되었다. 연직배수공법을 적용한 지역에서는 Asaoka방법이 침하량 예측 정확도가 다른 방법에 비해 높게 평가된다고 알려진 것과는 다르게 세 방법 모두 비슷한 정확도를 나타내었다. 또한 연구대상지역의 지반개량 전후의 확인조사를 통해 N치의 변화, 토층의 물리적, 역학적 특성을 조사하였으며, 개량 후 물성치는 개선되고, 침하량 크기와 관계되는 역학적 특성들은 개선되었다. 또한, 토질의 강도는 증가한 것을 확인하였으며, 침하량과 관계되는 물성치의 변화가 큰 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2005년도 춘계 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.924-931
• /
• 2005

In this study, we intended to compare and examine several settlement management methods by analyzing measurement results of a site of the industrial complex at ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$ province. We predicted and analyzed the amount of final settlement by using generally used final settlement methods as like Hyperbola method, Hoshino methods and Asaoka method. And then, We compared the predicted results with that of measurement. On the basis of comparison of the three methods, Hyperbola method was the most convenient and accurate method of the three methods and if a sufficient time was given enough after embankment construction, the use of Hoshino method was possible. In the case of the Asaoka methods, it was possible to know that it had an approaching tendency to the measured one with increasing time interval spent on analysis. Therefore, in order to predict settlement behavior more accurately it is needed to understand their advantages and shortcomings sufficiently and pay attention to application to the real site.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제38권6호
• /
• pp.35-41
• /
• 1996

The theory of consolidation has been achieved remarkable development in terms of theory such as finite consolidation theory, two dimensional Rendulic consolidation theory. Though those theories are well defined, the analysis is by no means straightforward, because associated properties are very difficult to determine in the laboratory, Therefore Terzaghi's one dimensional consolidation theory and Barron's cylindrical consolidation theory are still widely used in engineering practice. The theoretical shortcomings of those consolidation theories and uncertainties of associated properties make inevitably some discrepancy between theoretical and field settlements. Field settlement measurement by settlement plate is, therefore, widely used to overcome the discrepancy. Ultimate settlement is one of the most important factor of embankment construction on soft soils. Nowadays the ultimate settlement prediction methods using field settlement data are widely accepted as a helpful tool for field settlement analysis of embankment construction on soft soils. Among the various methods of ultimate settlement prediction, hyperbolic method and Asaoka's method are most commonly used because of their simplicity and ability to give a reasonable estimate of consolidation settlement. In this paper, the reliability of hyperbolic method and Asaoka's method has been examined using analytical methods. It is shown that both hyperbolic method and Asaoka's method are significantly affected by the direction of drainage.

• 한국지반환경공학회 논문집
• /
• 제13권10호
• /
• pp.5-13
• /
• 2012

본 연구에서는 계측자료를 토대로 장기침하량을 예측하는 방법 중 쌍곡선법(Hyperbolic Method), 호시노법(Hoshino Method), 아사오카법(Asaoka Method)을 이용하여 경남지역 3개 연약지반 현장의 계측 침하량을 분석하여 압밀도를 평가하였으며, 대상지역을 압밀 초기, 압밀 후기로 구분하여 각 구분에 따라 압밀도를 분석하여 계측기간에 따른 침하량 예측방법의 적용성을 연구 하였다. 그 결과는 압밀 초기에서는 쌍곡선법 > 아사오카법 > 호시노법 순으로 적용성이 높은 것으로 분석되었고, 압밀 후기에 서 아사오카법 > 쌍곡선법 > 호시노법 순으로 적용성이 높은 것으로 분석되었다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2009년도 세계 도시지반공학 심포지엄
• /
• pp.1202-1205
• /
• 2009

Embankment preloading, in conjunction with prefabricated vertical (PV) drains, was used to accelerate consolidation of marine clays in Pusan New Harbour project. UP to eightteen settlement plates were installed at the ground reclamated site under the embankment fill to monitor the preload performance. This analysis is carried out by five settlement prediction methods including the Asaoka, Hyperbolic, Hoshino, and back-analysis method based on optimization. The field settlement data can be analysed by settlement prediction methods to predict the ultimate settlement and the degree of consolidation of the reclaimed land under charge fill. The authors compared with the analyzed results of the methods.