• Title/Summary/Keyword: Antibiotic prophylaxis

Search Result 54, Processing Time 0.032 seconds

Short Term Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Open Heart Surgery (개심술시 단기적인 예방적 항생제 투여요법에 관한 연구)

  • 이건우
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.740-745
    • /
    • 1985
  • A retrospective double blind study comparing 7 day with 2 day regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis was conducted among 200 patients undergoing open heart surgery. No case of endocarditis and wound infection occurred. Pneumonia developed in 5 cases of the 7 day and 1 case of the 2 day group. Urinary tract infection without clinical significance developed in 1 case of the 7 day and 3 cases of the 2 day group. Bacteremia developed in 2 cases of the 7 day and 1 case of the 2 day group. We concluded as follows: l. Administration of antibiotics for 2 days appears to be without substantial risk of infection comparing long term 7 day regimen. 2. 7 days of antibiotics may actually increase the risk of serious infection such as nosocomial pneumonia, and predispose to the development of infections with fungi or antibiotic resistant bacteria. 3. 2 days of prophylaxis is more beneficial than long term 7 day regimen for example economically.

  • PDF

Antibiotics and Probiotics Prophylaxis for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Children

  • Lee, Jung Won
    • Childhood Kidney Diseases
    • /
    • v.20 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-5
    • /
    • 2016
  • Since many years, continuous low dose antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) has been used for children at a risk for recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI), especially those with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). The incidence of recurrent UTI has been shown to be higher in children with VUR with bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) than in those with VUR without BBD. Therefore, CAP has been recommended for children with BBD and VUR because of the increased risk of UTI. However, the use of CAP has become highly controversial because of bacterial resistance developed due to antibiotic over-usage. The preventive effects of probiotics have been proved in various adult urogenital infections, and the antimicrobial activities of lactobacilli against uropathogens have been demonstrated in previous in vitro studies. However, a critical assessment of their efficacy in children with UTI is lacking. The importance of the use of urogenital probiotics is that it is a natural approach that replenishes the depleted normal flora to create a better environment to fight off uropathogens. Probiotics have a great potential, particularly today with the increasing threat of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms.

DENIAL TREATMENT OF THE CHILD WITH CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE (선천성 심장질환 환아의 치과치료)

  • Kim, Jae-Gon;Lee, Yong-Hee;Kim, Mi-Ra;Baik, Byeong-Ju
    • Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
    • /
    • v.27 no.2
    • /
    • pp.208-215
    • /
    • 2000
  • Patient with congenital heart disease are susceptible to infective endocarditis, and bacteremia following dental procedures may lead to infective endocarditis is these patients. Therefore prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for patients with congenital heart disease who are undergoing dental procedures that are associated with infective endocarditis. In 1997 American Heart Association revised guidelines for a prophylaxis against infective endocarditis. The new American Heart Association recommendations for the prevention of infective endocarditis represent a substantial departure from past guidelines. Major change involve the indications for prophylaxis, antibiotic choice and dosing that may reduce bacteremic risk. Previously, antibiotic prophylaxis was suggested for dental procedures associated with any amount of bleeding. Now only those that are associated with significant bleeding are recommended for prophylaxis as dictated by clinical judgement. Recommended antibiotic prophylaxis regimens now consist of a single preprocedural dose, no second dose is recommended. This report presents three cases of dental treatment of patients with congenital heart disease under the most recent American Heart Association recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis.

  • PDF

Incidence and Risk Factors of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections during Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children with Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux (일차성 방광요관역류 소아에서 항생제 예방요법 중에 발생한 재발성 요로감염의 빈도와 위험인자)

  • Cho Su-Jin;Kim, Hyun-Jin;Lee Jeong-Won;Lee Seung-Joo
    • Childhood Kidney Diseases
    • /
    • v.9 no.1
    • /
    • pp.46-55
    • /
    • 2005
  • Purpose : Recurrent urinary tract Infection(UTI) in primary vesicoureteral reflux(VUR) may lead to serious renal scarring, a major cause of childhood hypertension and end-stage renal disease. To prevent recurrent UTI, low-dose long--term antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended. However, recurrent UTI still develops during antibiotic prophylaxis, the efficacy of which is now being disputed. The emergence of resistant bacteria has also raised concerns. To evaluate the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis, we investigated recurrent UTI during prophylactic antibiotic use in children with primary VUR Materials : The incidence and risk factors of recurrent UTI were retrospectively evaluated in ninety-one children with primary VUR on trimethoprim- sulfamethoxazole(TMP/SMX) prophylafis during the year following their index febri]e UTI. Results : Recurrent UTI occurred in 31.9%(29/91) children and comprised 0.32 episodes/patient year. Febrile UTI was 0.26 episode/patient year and afebrile UTI was 0.07 episodes/patient year. The recurrent rate of UTI in male patients with phimosis was 37.2%(19/51), which was significantly higher than in males without phimosis 0%(0/5)(P=0.025). In the logistic regression analysis for recurrent UTI, renal scar was the significant risk factor for recurrent UTI [RR 3.8(95% CI 1.0-14.1) P=0.04]. For other well-known risk factors such as sex, age, degree of VUR, APN, and voiding dysfunction, the differences were not significant. Conclusion : TMP/SMX prophylaxis did not prevent recurrent UTI in children with primary VUR. Phimosis and renal scars were the risk factors for recurrent UTI but the grade of primary VUR was not. In VUR without phlmosis and renal scar, a randomized controlled study without antibiotic prophylaxis is required. (J Korean Soc Pediatr Nephrol 2005;9:46-55)

  • PDF

Antibiotic Prophylaxis' Effect on Enophthalmos in Orbital Floor Fracture with Chronic Maxillary Sinusitis (상악동염이 있는 안와 하벽 골절에서 예방적 항생제의 중요성)

  • Sung, Hyoung Woo;Kim, Jin Woo;Shin, Han Kyung;Jung, Jae Hak;Kim, Young Hwan;Sun, Hook
    • Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.67-71
    • /
    • 2008
  • Purpose: Orbital floor fracture has open wound to maxillary sinus and if the patient has chronic maxillary sinusitis, it may be have more risk of infection, complications. The purpose of this comparative study is to be the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in orbital floor fracture with chronic maxillary sinusitis. Methods: We studied 20 patients who diagnosed as orbital floor fracture with chronic maxillary sinusitis from march, 2005 to may, 2006. Among them 16 were male, 4 were female and age was ranged from 15 to 68, average was 42. A day before operation, Prophylactic antibiotics were used to 10 patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were not used to 10 patients. We defined control group as prophylactic antibiotics injection group a day before operation. After surgery, we confined use of same antibiotic for 7 days in both group. After 6 month from surgery, we compare the degree of enophthalmos from healthy side to legion side with hertel exopthalmometry(Inami, Japan) in control group and non-prophylactic antibiotics injection group. Results: In control group, comparison of discrepancy between enophthalmic eyeball and normal eyeball with Hertel exophthalmometer was 1.1 mm and non-prophylactic antibiotics injection group was 2.1 mm. In independent sample t-test, control group was showed statistically significant difference with non-prophylactic antibiotics injection group(p=0.007). Conclusions: In orbital floor fracture with chronic maxillary sinusitis, bacteria in maxillary sinus can increase post-operative complication by infecting infraorbital soft tissue, and it is thought to be antibiotic prophylaxis is play a role in decrease in degree of enophthalmos. We feel the need to further study of prophylactic antibiotics in orbital floor fracture with chronic maxillary sinusitis.

Appropriate Duration of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Acute Nonperforated Appendicitis (급성 비천공성 충수염 수술시 예방적 항균제의 사용기간)

  • Suh, Ok Kyung;Kang, Sung Hee;Yang, Dae Hyun;Shin, Wan Gyoon
    • Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
    • /
    • v.12 no.2
    • /
    • pp.65-70
    • /
    • 2002
  • Prophylactic antibiotics in acute nonperforated appendicitis have been used for preventing infection after appendectomy. However, duration of antibiotic administration for surgical prophylaxis in Korea has been noted to be longer than those recommended in other countries. The objective of this study was to identify appropriate duration of prophylactic antibiotics in acute nonperforated appendicitis by comparing two different antibiotic regimens for their wound infection rates. Eighty-four acute nonperforated appendicitis patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, open trial and were assigned to one of two antibiotic regimens: cefoxitin 1 g every 8 hours given intravenously for 24hours or cefoxitin 1 g every 8 hours given intravenously plus sisomicin 75 mg every 12 hours given jntramuscularly for 72 hours. First doses were given just prior to the induction of anesthesia. Postoperative wound infections were detected in $4.8\%$ of the 72-hour-treated group (n=42), whereas none occurred in the 24-hour-treated group (n=42). However, the difference in the rates of wound infections between two groups was not statistically significant. The most frequently isolated microorganism from appendiceal tissues was E coli. In conclusion, administration of cefoxitin alone for 24 hours is sufficient as surgical prophylaxis in nonperforated appendicitis.

  • PDF

Antibiotic use in nasal bone fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Korea

  • Jeon, Yeo Reum;Jung, Ji Hyuk;Song, Joon Ho;Chung, Seum
    • Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
    • /
    • v.22 no.5
    • /
    • pp.254-259
    • /
    • 2021
  • Background: Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used in craniofacial surgeries. Despite the low risk of surgical site infection after nasal surgery, a lack of consensus regarding the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the closed reduction of nasal bone fractures has led to inappropriate prescribing patterns. Through this study, we aimed to investigate the status of prophylactic antibiotic use in closed reductions of nasal bone fractures in Korea. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort of Korea from 2005 to 2015. We analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent closed reduction of nasal bone fractures. The sex, age, region of residence, comorbidities, and socioeconomic variables of the patients were collected from the database. Factors that affect the prescription of perioperative antibiotics were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 3,678 patients (mean±standard deviation of age, 28.7±14.9 years; 2,850 men [77.5%]; 828 women [22.5%]) were included in this study. The rate of antibiotic prescription during the perioperative period was 51.4%. Approximately 68.8% of prescriptions were written for patients who had received general anesthesia. The odds of perioperative prophylactic antibiotic use were significantly higher in patients who received general anesthesia than who received local anesthesia (odds ratio, 1.59). No difference was found in terms of patient age and physician specialty. Second-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (45.3%), followed by third- and first-generation cephalosporins (20.3% and 18.8%, respectively). In contrast, lincomycin derivatives and aminoglycosides were not prescribed. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that there was a wide variety of perioperative antibiotic prescription patterns used in nasal bone surgeries. Evidence-based guidance regarding the prescribing of antimicrobial agents for the closed reduction of nasal bone fractures should be considered in future research.

Feasibility of No Prophylactic Antibiotics Use in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: a Propensity Score-Matched Case-Control Study

  • Na, Yongmin;Kang, Ji Hoon;Jung, Mi Ran;Ryu, Seong Yeob;Jeong, Oh
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • v.19 no.4
    • /
    • pp.451-459
    • /
    • 2019
  • Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with lower surgical site infection (SSI) rates due to minimal skin incision and non-exposure of visceral organs. Most previous studies have analyzed the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic use in open surgery. Here, we investigated the feasibility of total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for gastric carcinoma without prophylactic antibiotic use. Materials and Methods: Seventy-one patients who underwent TLDG without prophylactic antibiotic use were 1:1 propensity score matched with 393 patients who underwent TLDG with antibiotic prophylaxis. The short-term surgical outcomes, including SSI rates, were compared between the groups. Results: After matching, 65 patients were selected in each group. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics were well balanced in the matched sample. In the matched group, there was no significant increase in postoperative morbidity in the non-prophylactic group compared with the prophylactic group (18.5% vs. 15.4%, P=0.640), and there were no grade 3≤ complications (1.4% vs. 0%, respectively; P=1.000). The SSI rates in the non-prophylactic and prophylactic groups were 3.1% and 1.5%, respectively (P=0.559). The time to gas passage, diet initiation, and mean hospital stay were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The SSI rate did not increase in the non-prophylactic group in the different subgroups based on different clinicopathological characteristics. Conclusions: Postoperative morbidity, including SSI rates, did not significantly increase in patients undergoing TLDG without prophylactic antibiotic use. A large prospective randomized trial is warranted to reappraise the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic use in patients undergoing TLDG.

No more tears from surgical site infections in interventional pain management

  • Seungjin Lim;Yeong-Min Yoo;Kyung-Hoon Kim
    • The Korean Journal of Pain
    • /
    • v.36 no.1
    • /
    • pp.11-50
    • /
    • 2023
  • As the field of interventional pain management (IPM) grows, the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) is increasing. SSI is defined as an infection of the incision or organ/space that occurs within one month after operation or three months after implantation. It is also common to find patients with suspected infection in an outpatient clinic. The most frequent IPM procedures are performed in the spine. Even though primary pyogenic spondylodiscitis via hematogenous spread is the most common type among spinal infections, secondary spinal infections from direct inoculation should be monitored after IPM procedures. Various preventive guidelines for SSI have been published. Cefazolin, followed by vancomycin, is the most commonly used surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in IPM. Diagnosis of SSI is confirmed by purulent discharge, isolation of causative organisms, pain/tenderness, swelling, redness, or heat, or diagnosis by a surgeon or attending physician. Inflammatory markers include traditional (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and white blood cell count) and novel (procalcitonin, serum amyloid A, and presepsin) markers. Empirical antibiotic therapy is defined as the initial administration of antibiotics within at least 24 hours prior to the results of blood culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Definitive antibiotic therapy is initiated based on the above culture and testing. Combination antibiotic therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections appears to be superior to monotherapy in mortality with the risk of increasing antibiotic resistance rates. The never-ending war between bacterial resistance and new antibiotics is continuing. This article reviews prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infection in pain medicine.

A Case of Infantile Fungal Urinary Tract Infection

  • Cho, Wonhee;Jo, Young Min;Oh, Yun Kyo;Rim, Ji Woo;Lee, Won Uk;Choi, Kyongeun;Ko, Jeong Hee;Jeon, Yeon Jin;Choi, Yumi
    • Childhood Kidney Diseases
    • /
    • v.23 no.2
    • /
    • pp.121-123
    • /
    • 2019
  • Urinary tract infection is common in the pediatric population. The most common causative agents are bacteria, among which Escherichia coli is the most frequent uropathogen. Although fungal urinary tract infection is rare in the healthy pediatric population, it is relatively common among hospitalized patients. Fungus may be isolated from the urine of immunocompromised patients or that of patients with indwelling catheters. The most common cause of funguria is Candida albicans. Although more than 50% of Candida isolates belong to non-albicans Candida, the prevalence of non-albicans candiduria is increasing. Herein, we report a case of community-acquired candiduria in a 4-month-old immunocompetent male infant who had bilateral vesicoureteral reflux and was administered antibiotic prophylaxis. He was diagnosed with urinary tract infection caused by Candida lusitaniae and was managed with fluconazole.