• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 1995

The purposes of this study were to investigate the effects of systematic analogy on pupils' concepts changes compared with non-systematic analogy and no analogy using longuitudal study. The subjects were the second year middle school students(N=140), 49 of them were experimental group, using systematic analogy; 47 of them were control group 1, using non-systematic analogy; and 44 of them were control group 2, using no analogy. We have elicited their ideas about electric current three times: pretest, posttest and delayed posttest by P-O-E(Prediction-Observation-Explanation) method. With time, resistant ;rrelevant idea was decreasing dominantly; sequential reasoning idea and scientific idea were increasing; and current consumption idea was rare. Systematic analogy is more effective than non-systematic analogy on pupils' concepts changes of electric current. Systematic analogy is more effective than no analogy in case of simple situation, but we couldn't find significant difference between systematic analogy and no analogy in case of complicated situation.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.419-433
• /
• 2015

Analogical reasoning is a central component of human cognition and contributes to scientific discovery and to develop science education. In this study, we investigated the process features of lower elementary school students' analogical reasoning to explain mixture concept. The subjects are 24 lower elementary students. And the research design includes three phases instruction to investigate the features of students' self generated analogy. Phase 1 is the introduction of analogy in which student learn to use analogy. Phase 2 is a POE class about mixture conception. Piaget and Inhelder studied the conception of mixing among children in relation to cognitive development. In phase 2, we taught the student with Piaget and Inhelder's the experiment and observed the features of learning process about mixture conception. Phase 3 is students' generation of analogy (self generated analogy) for the experienced phenomena in phase 2. We analyzed the students' responses through the three phases in the view of Gentner's Structure Mapping Theory. The results showed that many lower elementary school students even before formal operation stage understood the mixture conception and made well their self generated analogy to explain the mixture conception in spite of the difficulty of making self generated analogy.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.407-416
• /
• 2017

이 연구에서는 협력적 비유 생성 활동에서 나타나는 비유의 변화과정과 소집단 및 전체 학급 토론의 특징을 분석하였다. 서울특별시에 소재한 고등학교에 재학 중인 24명의 학생을 대상으로 협력적 비유 생성 활동을 적용한 수업을 진행하였다. 학생들이 생성한 개인 비유와 소집단 비유, 수정된 소집단 비유를 비교하여 비유의 변화과정을 분석하였으며, 비유 생성 활동을 위한 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론의 특징을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 비유의 변화 과정은 공유속성이 추가되는 경우, 비공유 속성을 인식하는 경우, 대응 오류가 수정되는 경우의 세 가지 변화 유형이 나타났다. 학생들은 여러 개인 비유 중 하나를 선택하는 방식으로 소집단 비유를 생성하였고, 이때 비유의 설명력, 독창성, 친숙도 등을 고려하는 것으로 나타났다. 학생들은 비유 생성 활동을 주관적이고 창의적인 활동이라고 인식하여 비유 생성 활동에 대한 정서적 부담감이 적었고 소집단 토론에서 갈등의 요소도 적었다. 전체 학급 토론에서는 다양한 비유가 제시되었으며 전체 학급 토론의 경쟁적인 분위기는 학생들이 비유가 갖는 비공유 속성에 주목하게 하였다. 소집단 비유 수정 단계에서 학생들은 비공유 속성을 비유가 갖는 제한점으로 추가하거나 비공유 속성을 갖지 않도록 비유를 변형하는 방식으로 비유를 수정하였고, 새로운 비유를 생성하는 경우는 거의 없었다. 이상의 결과를 바탕으로 협력적 비유 생성 활동을 적용한 수업을 효과적으로 진행하기 위한 방안을 논의하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.42-48
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument for assessing teachers' awareness of science teaching through analogy (ASTA) and to establish its validity and reliability. Based on the literatures on science teaching with analogies, we constructed 23 survey items. Face validity of the items was established using three science education experts. Through exploratory factor analysis with responses of 35 pre- and 26 inservice elementary school teachers, the instruments were constructed on four subcategories: awareness of analogies in science, use of analogy in teaching and learning, self-efficacy in science knowledge, and knowledge of analogy. The data collected from pre- and in-service elementary teachers demonstrated that overall the teachers' awareness of analogy in science was neutral, which indicated they did not have clear standpoints of science teaching through analogy. Further examination demonstrated that there was no significant difference between pre- and in-service teachers and between two genders. Moreover, there was no significant difference among teachers who preferred either didactic or discovery teaching approaches. We conclude that ASTA test would contribute assessment of teachers' awareness of analogy in science teaching while further examination of the instrument will warrant for its broader use.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.31-38
• /
• 2010

The objective of this study is to find a educational method that is able to increase creativity using both left and right directed thinking with complementary cooperation. The premise of experimental study is that analogical inference is a great help to make a creative design, and design tasks of commercial space, fashion shop and herb cafe are given to 25 students, voluntary participants in experimental tests. Tests make a clear distinction between a case using verbal analogy from many keywords and another case using verbal visual analogy from keywords and visual images. Consequently, when students use both verbal and visual analogy in solving design tasks their creative ability qualitatively as well as quantitatively is higher than in using verbal analogy. However, when students are classified with high and low sketching group verbal visual analogy is effective for students with high sketching ability to enhance both practicality and originality. Even students with low sketching ability can improve originality remarkably by using verbal visual analogy. In experiment there is time limit, a hour, but in actual studio class it is desirable that an educator guides the latter to make up for the weak points in practicality of their design taking time. Further study will be progressed with the design tasks of residential space to compare with the findings of this study.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.38-46
• /
• 2010

The objective of this study is to find an educational method that is able to increase creativity using both left and right directed thinking with complementary cooperation. The premise of experimental study is that analogical inference is a great help to produce a creative design, and the design tasks of residential space are given to 20 students, voluntary participants in four experimental tests. The first test is conducted with fundamental conditions such as site or location, users and their design requirements. Other three tests make a clear distinction with three cases using verbal analogy from many keywords, using visual analogy from many images and using verbal visual analogy from keywords and visual images. Consequently, when students use both verbal and visual analogy in solving design tasks their creative ability qualitatively as well as quantitatively is higher than in using only verbal analogy or visual analogy. Further study will be progressed with the design tasks of residential space in order to have an effective verification by comparing students' design results classified into two groups. One is a control group that consists of sophomore students in a college and another is a comparison group that consists of sophomore students in an university.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.219-232
• /
• 2010

In this study, we investigated and compared the types of analogy generation processes and the perceptions of analogy generation on saturated solution of fifth grade scientifically-gifted and general elementary students. After the instruction of self-generating analogies on 'saturated solution' concept for two classes, 12 scientifically-gifted and 8 general elementary students were interviewed to explore their analogy generation processes and the perceptions of the abilities required in the processes, the conditions of good analogies, and the advantages/disadvantages of analogy generation. The results revealed that their analogy generation processes were classified into three types. The scientifically-gifted students generated the analogies in more systematic and efficient ways and had better understanding of the important parts in the processes than the general elementary students. They also suggested more concrete and various ideas about the conditions of good analogies. Many scientifically-gifted and general elementary students thought that analogy generation would have positive influences on the developments of the cognitive aspects such as various higher-level thinking abilities and understanding of science concepts as well as the affective aspects such as science learning motivation and interest. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.507-518
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of verbal analogy activities on science achievement and science attitude of elementary students. Students consolidated lessons by making short sentences with core words that a teacher gave for scaffolding instruction. Many researches about analogies have been conducted in science education. However, most of them considered analogy as learning tools, whereas this research considers analogy as a cognitive process. To see the effects of verbal analogy activities, two groups were selected from 6th grade elementary school students; one was an experimental group working with the student-generated verbal analogy and the other was a control group with teacher-centered and textbook-centered activities. Science achievement, scientific attitudes, attitudes toward science and retention were tested after the treated lessons.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.581-599
• /
• 2002

This study investigated the factorization concept development level of 3rd grades in middle school, the success of factorization problem solving, and the completion of factorization analogy tasks and science concepts analogy tasks. This study's results are followings. 1. Based on Sfard' reification levels, we classified students' factorization concept development levels from level 0 to level 3. As the students' development level was high, they tended to succeed the factorization problems gradually. 2. Experiencing factorization tasks which made students arrange factorization expressions hating same characterization, students ' factorization problem solving was improved. And, as the students' development level was high, they tended to attend to internal structural relations in factorization analogy tasks. 3. Analogy in factorization wasn't interrelated with analogy in science concepts. It said that analogy depended on the knowledges with it.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.63-70
• /
• 2007

Analogy in problem solving is similarity-based reasoning facilitated by verbal and visual operation. This similarity-based reasoning generally supports initial phase of idea search. Therefore, this study intends to infer the types of problem solving by tracing the analogy use of verbal and visual representation through a experimental research. According to the result of this research, the types of problem solving by analogy are classified into 'evolving', 'divergent', and 'poor conversion' type. Firstly, 'evolving type' is distinguished between 'combination type' associated different contents to develope a new design and 'transformation type' associated similar words and sketches to be continuously revised and developed. In these types usually structural analogy rather than surface analogy is used. Secondly, in 'divergent type' associated words or sketches are individually represented, and among them one design solution is selected. In this type usually surface analogy is used. Thirdly, in 'poor conversion type' interaction between verbal representation and visual representation does not go on smoothly, and the generation of idea is poor. In here surface analogy is mostly used. These findings could form the basis of skill development of idea generation and conversion in design education.