1 |
Aragon, M. D. M., Oliva, J. M., & Navarrete, A. (2014). Contributions of learning through analogies to the construction of secondary education pupils’ verbal discourse about chemical change. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1960-1984.
DOI
|
2 |
Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2011). Investigating and theorizing discourse during analogy writing in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 771-792.
DOI
|
3 |
Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 108-124.
DOI
|
4 |
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
|
5 |
BouJaoude, S., & Tamim, R. (2008). Middle school students' perceptions of the instructional value of analogies, summaries and answering questions in life science. Science Educator, 17(1), 72-78.
|
6 |
Byun C. S., & Kim, H. (2010). The effects of student-centered instruction using analogy for middle school students' learning of the photosynthesis concept. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(2), 304-322.
|
7 |
Choi, K. (2004). The effects of students' self-created analogies on their understanding of electricity-related concepts. Sae Mulli (The Korean Physical Society), 48(5), 401-410.
|
8 |
Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Analysis of analogies used by science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 259-270.
DOI
|
9 |
Do, S. L. (2005). Emotion and classroom talk: Toward a model of affect in students’ experiences of classroom discussion. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(1), 17-39.
|
10 |
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672.
DOI
|
11 |
Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., & Jonsson, G. (2009). Talking physics during small-group work with context-rich problems-analysed from an ownership perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 455-472.
DOI
|
12 |
Enghag, M., & Niedderer, H. (2008). Two dimensions of student ownership of learning during small-group work in physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(4), 629-653.
DOI
|
13 |
Fensham, P. (1975). Concept formation. In D. J. Daniels (Ed.), New movements in the study and teaching of chemistry (pp. 199-217). London: Temple Smith.
|
14 |
Fogwill, S. (2010). Student co-generated analogies and their influence on the development of science understanding. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
|
15 |
Glynn, S. M. (1989). The teaching with analogies model. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children's comprehension of text: Research into practice (pp. 185-204). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
|
16 |
Haglund, J. (2013). Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 35-68.
DOI
|
17 |
Haglund, J., & Jeppsson, F. (2012). Using self-generated analogies in teaching of thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 898-921.
DOI
|
18 |
Choi, S. Y., Lee, E. J., & Kang, H. K. (2006). The effects of the visual-analogical learning on student creativity and science achievement in elementary school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(2), 167-176.
|
19 |
Kim, Y., & Noh, T. (2015). An analysis of verbal interaction and analogy-generating pattern of science-gifted students in learning using analogy-generating strategy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 1063-1076.
DOI
|
20 |
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316.
DOI
|
21 |
Clark, D. B. (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students' understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24(4), 467-563.
DOI
|
22 |
Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183-198.
DOI
|
23 |
Wong, E. D. (1993b). Understanding the generative capacity of analogies as a tool for explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1259-1272.
DOI
|
24 |
Shim, Y., Kim, C.-J., Choe, S.-U., Kim, H.-B., Yoo, J., Park, H., ... Jang, S. (2015). Exploring small group features of the social-construction process of scientific model in a combustion class. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 217-229.
DOI
|
25 |
Spier-Dance, L., Mayer-Smith, J., Dance, N., & Khan, S. (2005). The role of student-generated analogies in promoting conceptual understanding for undergraduate chemistry students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(2), 163-178.
DOI
|
26 |
Spiro, R. J., Feltovitch, P. J., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 498-531). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|
27 |
Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). An interpretive examination of high school chemistry teachers' analogical explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(3), 227-242.
DOI
|
28 |
Wong, E. D. (1993a). Self-generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 367-380.
DOI
|
29 |
Yang, C., Kim, S., Jo, M., & Noh, T. (2016). The characteristics of group and classroom discussions in the scientific modeling of the particulate model of matter. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 361-369.
DOI
|
30 |
Yerrick, R. K., Doster, E., Nugent, J. S., Parke, H. M., & Crawley, F. E. (2003). Social interaction and the use of analogy: An analysis of preservice teachers’ talk during physics inquiry lessons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 443-463.
DOI
|
31 |
Noh, T., & Kwon, H. (1999). A study on science teachers' practices and perceptions of using analogies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(4), 665-673.
|
32 |
May, D. B., Hammer, D., & Roy, P. (2006). Children's analogical reasoning in a third-grade science discussion. Science Education, 90(2), 316-330.
DOI
|
33 |
Mozzer, N. B., & Justi, R. (2012). Students' pre- and post-teaching analogical reasoning when they draw their analogies. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 429-458.
DOI
|
34 |
Mozzer, N. B., & Justi, R. (2013). Science teachers' analogical reasoning. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1689-1713.
DOI
|
35 |
Kim, D. (2008). The effects of applying instruction using high school students’ self-generated analogies for concepts in genetics. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(5), 424-437.
|
36 |
Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011-1026.
DOI
|
37 |
Heywood, D., & Parker, J. (1997). Confronting the analogy: Primary teachers exploring the usefulness in the teaching and learning of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 19(8), 869-885.
DOI
|
38 |
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2006). The role of analog models in the understanding of the nature of models in chemistry. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 119-131). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
39 |
Kim, K., Choi, E., Cha, J., & Noh, T. (2006). The effect of an instruction using generating analogy on students’ conceptual understanding in middle school science concept learning. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 50(4), 338-345.
DOI
|
40 |
Kim, M., Kwon, H., Kim, Y., & Noh, T. (2017). An investigation of the characteristics of analogies generated by high school students on ionic bonding: A comparison of characteristics of analogies depending on their cognitive variables. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 39-48.
DOI
|
41 |
Lin, T. J., Anderson, R. C., Hummel, J. E., Jadallah, M., Miller, B. W., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., ... Dong, T. (2012). Children's use of analogy during collaborative reasoning. Child Development, 83(4), 1429-1443.
DOI
|
42 |
Noh, T., Yang, C., & Kang, H. (2009). Characteristics of student-generated analogies, mapping understanding, and mapping errors on saturated solution of scientifically-gifted and general elementary students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(3), 292-303.
|
43 |
Park, H., Kim, H., Jang, S., Shim, Y., Kim, C.-J., Kim, H.-B., ... Park, K.-M. (2014). Characteristics of social interaction in scientific modeling instruction on combustion in middle school. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 58(4), 393-405.
DOI
|
44 |
Ryu, S., Chang, H., & Choi, K. (2008). The effects of self-generated analogies on the concept of photoelectric effect in Modern Physics unit of high school physics course. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 12(1), 83-96.
DOI
|
45 |
Zook, K. B. (1991). Effects of analogical processes on learning and misrepresentation. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 41-72.
DOI
|
46 |
Yoon, J.-A., & Kang, H. (2011). The effects of analogy-generating in small group on saturated solution in elementary science-gifted education. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 55(3), 509-518.
DOI
|