• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.105-112
• /
• 2014

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of three different surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets bonded directly to gold alloy with chemically cured resin. Methods: Two hundred ten type III gold alloy specimens were randomly divided into six groups according to the combination of three different surface conditioning methods (aluminum oxide sandblasting only, application of a metal primer after aluminum oxide sandblasting, silica coating and silanation) and thermocycling (with thermocycling, without thermocycling). After performing surface conditioning of specimens in accordance with each experimental condition, metal brackets were bonded to all specimens using a chemically cured resin. The SBS was measured at the moment of bracket debonding, and the resin remnants on the specimen surface were evaluated using the adhesive remnant index. Results: Application of metal primer after aluminum oxide sandblasting yielded a higher bond strength than that with aluminum oxide sandblasting alone (p < 0.001), and silica coating and silanation yielded a higher bond strength than that with metal primer after aluminum oxide sandblasting (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in SBS after thermocycling in all groups. Conclusions: With silica coating and silanation, clinically satisfactory bond strength can be attained when metal brackets are directly bonded to gold alloys using a chemically cured resin.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.117-127
• /
• 1991

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment of fractured metal-ceramic crown on bond strength of porcelain repair resin. The specimens were divided into two groups for metal specimens add five groups for porcelain specimens by surface treatment methods. the metal specimens were treated by 2 methods. : micro-sandblasting with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide and grinding with diamond bur. The porcelain specimens were treated by 5 methods : micro-sandblasting with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide, grinding with diamond bur, etching with porcelain etching agent, combination of micro-sandblasting and etching procedure, and combination of grinding and etching procedure. After surface treatment, each specimen was bonded with composite resin and the bond strength was measured and the surface texture was observed by scanning electromicroscope(SEM). The results were as follows : 1. There was significant difference in shear bond strength between metal specimen and prorcelain specimen. 2. Bood strength of metal specimens treated with diamond bur was higher than that treated with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide sandblasting. 3. Bond strength of porcelain specimen treated with diamond bur was higher than that treated with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide sandblasting and porcelain etching agent. 4. There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the group treated with diamond bur and combined treatment groups respectively. 5. The large undercuts were observed in group treated with diamond bur by SEM.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 2013

본 연구의 목적은 각각 다른 표면처리를 한 지르코니아를 레진시멘트로 접착한 후 전단결합강도를 평가, 비교하는 것이다. 디스크 모양의 산화 지르코늄(3-TZP, Kyoritsu, Tokyo, Japan) 시편 120 개를 다음과 같이 표면처리 하였다. (1)110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사 처리 (2)Silica coating(RocatecTM, 3M ESPE) (3)처리하지 않음 시편을 한 군당 10 개씩 총 6 개군으로 나누어 두 개의 지르코니아 시편을 자가 접착형 레진 시멘트(RelyX U-200, 3M ESPE)로 합착하였다. (1)처리하지 않음/처리하지 않음 (2)처리하지 않음/110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사처리 (3)처리하지 않음/Silica coating (4)110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사 처리/110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사 처리 (5)110 ${\mu}m$ 산화 알루미나 분사 처리/Silica coating (6)Silica coating/Silica coating. 각 군의 전단결합강도를 만능시험기로 측정하였다. 표면처리에 따른 결합강도의 차이를 살펴보기 위해 일원변량분석(One-way ANOVA)을 이용하고 사후 분석으로 Tukey HSD test를 실시하였다. Silica coating을 한 두 개의 시편을 접착한 군이 가장 높은 결합 강도를 보였다(P<0.05). 표면 처리하지 않은 시편을 접착한 군과 두 개의 시편 모두 알루미나 분사 처리한 시편을 접착한 군은 서로 간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으며, 그 외의 군에 비해서는 유의하게 낮았다(P<0.05). 본 연구의 결과에 따르면 Silica coating은 자가중합형 레진시멘트를 이용하여 접착한 두 지르코니아 간의 결합을 증진시키는데 효과적이었다.

• 대한의생명과학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.105-113
• /
• 2008

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface modifications on the bonding characteristics and cytotoxicity of specific titanium porcelain bonded to milling titanium and cast titanium. Milling titanium and cast titanium samples were divided into 8 test groups. These groups are as follow: i) sandblasted with particles of different size of $220{\mu}m\;and\;50{\mu}m$, ii) different sequences of sandblasting treatment and etching treatment, iii) etched with different etching solutions, and iv) preheated or not. The surface characteristics of specimens were characterized by the test of mean roughness of surface and SEM. The bond strength of titanium-ceramic systems was measured by using three-point bending test and SEM. The results show that the mean roughness of surface of sample sandblasted with $220{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide increased and bond strength were higher than sample sandblasted with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. The mean roughness of surface decreased, but the bond strength increased when the samples sandblasted with $220{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide were preheated. The sample sandblasted with $220{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide after oxidized with occupational corrosive agent I (50% NaOH, 10% $CuSO_4{\cdot}5H_2O$) and II (35% $HNO_3$, 5% HF) showed higher bond strength than sample oxidized with 30% $HNO_3$ after sandblasted with $220{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. Group NaCuNF220SP (milling Ti: 35.3985 MPa, casting Ti: 37.2306 MPa) which was treated with occupational corrosive agent I (50% NaOH, 10% $CuSO_4{\cdot}5H_2O$) and II (35% $HNO_3$, 5% HF), followed by sandblasting with $220{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide and preheating at $750^{\circ}C$ for 1 hour showed the highest bond strength and significant differences (P<0.05). The method for modifying surface of titanium showed excellent stability of cells.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.296-305
• /
• 2002

The main disadvantage of cement-retained implant restorations is their difficulty in retrievability. Advocates of cemented implant restorations frequently state that retrievability of the restoration can be maintained if a provisional cement is used. The purpose of this study was to find the optimal properties of provisional luting cements and the surface treatment of abutments in single implant abutment system. 30 prefabricated implant abutments, height 8mm, diameter 6mm, 3-degree taper per side, with light chamfer margins were obtained. Three commercially available provisional luting agents which were all zinc oxide eugenol type ; Cavitec, TempBond and TempBond NE were evaluated. No cement served as the control. TempBond along with vaseline, a kind of petrolatum (2:1 ratio) was also evaluated. Ten out of thirty abutments were randomly selected and abutment surfaces were sandblasted with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. Another ten abutments were sandblasted with $250{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. A vertical groove, 1 mm deep and 5mm long was cut in each twenty abutments. Ten of them were sandblasted with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide. The full coverage casting crowns were cemented to the abutments with the designated provisional luting agent. Specimens were stored in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours. Each specimen was attached to a universal testing machine. A crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min was used to apply a tensile force to each specimen. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. Tensile bond strength of provisional luting cements in no surface treatment decreased with the sequence of TempBond NE, TempBond, Cavitec, TempBond with vaseline, no cement. 2. Tensile bond strength more increased by surface treatment. Sandblasting with $250{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide exhibited the highest tensile bond strength in the abutment cemented with TempBond NE and sandblasting with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide exhibited the highest tensile bond strength in cemented with TempBond. 3. In the aspect of a groove formation, tensile bond strength significantly increased in TempBond with vaseline only and the others had no significant effect on tensile bond strength.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.29-51
• /
• 1990

This study was designed to compre the tensile bond strength of 4-META containging denture base resin to Co-Cr alloys after various surface treatments. Especially the surface treatment of sandblasting the mental with aluminum oxide and treating in oxidizing solution composed of 3% aqueous sulfuric acid with 1% potassium manganate were compared. Effect of surface roughness on bonding was measured after sandblasting with 50um, 300um aluminun oxide and polishing with emery pater. Also the effects of wax and wax solvent on bonding were observed. According to the type of polymerization process, heat-cured Meta-Dent resin and autopolymerizing Meta-Fast resin were used. For some specimnens, the tensile bond strength were measured agter three pre-conditions : 1day after bonding, immersed in water at $75^{\circ}C{\pm}3^{\circ}C$ for 4weeks, under normal ambient condition for 4weeks. The following results were obtained from this study : 1. The bond strengths of resins containing 4-META were significantly higher than those of conventional denture base resins(p<0.05). 2. Autopolymerizing Meta-Fast resin had higher bond strength than heat-cured Meta-Dent, resin(p<0.05). 3. The bond strengths of Biosil and Nobilium to 4-META containging resins were not significally different(p>0.05). 4. Stable adhesion can be achieved when mechanically roughen the metal surface by snadblasting with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide than treating in an oxidizing soluing with potassium manganate(p<0.05). 5. Once the metal surface is contaminated with wax, the bond srtength decreased greatly in spite of wax wash with boiling water. But the bond strength recovered significantly with the use of wax solvent 6. Meta-Dent resin had higher bond strength when roughen the metal surface with $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide than with $300{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide(p<0.05). In case of Meta-Fast, resin, the use of $300{\mu}m$aluminum oxide was a little advantageous of bonding, but was statistically insignificant(p>0.05).

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제40권6호
• /
• pp.590-596
• /
• 2002

The resin : metal interface is at the basis of most bonding failures in resin-bonded prosthesis. Although debonding has been a problem with adhesive fixed partial dentures, various dentists classify them as long-term restorations. The advantages of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures include minimal tooth reduction and the possibility of rebonding. if resin-bonded protheses can be easily rebounded, it is of clinical importance to know if the lutingagents rebond as well the second time as they did originally. Several retentive systems for resin-to-metal bonding have recommended. Treatments such as electrolytic etching and silicone coating, despite the good result of bond strength, have proved to be time-consuming and technique-sensitive. Therefore a simple and more reliable method is desirable. This study evaluated the effect of metal surface treatments on the rebond strength of panavia 21 cement to a nickel-chromium(Ni-Cr) alloy. The samples were received the following surface treatments : Group No.1 (control or served as the control) treatment with sandblasting with 50um aluminum oxide and ultrasonically cleaned for 10minutes in double-deionized water, Group No.2 were no surface treatments. Group No.3 were treated with metal primer. Group No.4 were treated with sandblasting as previously described, and then metal priming. From the analysis of the results, the following conclusions were drawn. 1. Sandblasting and metal priming appears to be an effective method for treatment of metal after accidental debonding. 2. Group without surface treatment had significantly lower bond strengths compared with other groups. 3. The combination of sandblasting and metal priming may not develop superior bonding strengths compared with other techniques that used the Ni-Cr alloys. 4. Combination of cohesive and adhesive failures were the most common type observed. The results support the use of sandblasting as a viable procedure when rebonding accidentally lost adhesive partial denture. We concluded that sandblasting and metal priming of metal surface before bonding could provide the adequate bond strength during rebonding of resin-bonded fixed partial denture.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.399-406
• /
• 2000

광중합형 글래스아이오노머 베이스에 대한 레진 인레이의 접착성을 증가시킬 수 있는 방법을 모색하고자, 이차 중합된 레진 인레이의 내표면을 여러 가지 방법으로 처리한 후 레진 인레이를 광중합형 글래스아이오노머 베이스에 레진 시멘트 접착시 내표면 처리방법이 이들의 접착에 미치는 영향을 평가하고자 하였다. 글래스아이오노머 베이스 제작을 위해서 플라스틱 봉에 직경 7mm, 깊이 2mm의 1급 와동을 형성하고 Fuji II LC를 충전하였으며, 수복용 레진(Charisma$^{(R)}$)을 사용하여 레진 인레이를 제작하였다. 레진 인레이 내면은 $50{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide particles를 이용한 sandblasting 및 silane 처리군, silane 처리군, sandblasting 군, 그리고 무처리 대조군 등 4군으로 나누어 표면처리하였으며 각 군은 22개씩의 시편을 사용하였다. 인레이와 베이스의 표면에 상아질 접착제(One-Step$^{TM}$)를 도포한 후 Choice$^{TM}$를 사용하여 레진시멘트 접착하였다. 접착 양상 평가를 위해 만능시험기로 전단접착강도를 측정하고 파단면을 입체현미경으로 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. Sandblasting 및 silane 처리군이 가장 높은 접착강도(10.56${\pm}$1.95MPa)를 나타내었으며, 이는 sandblasting군 및 무처리 대조군에 비해 유의하게 높았다(p<0.05). 2. Silane 처리군(9.77${\pm}$2.04MPa)은 sandblasting 및 silane 처리군과는 접착력에 있어서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았으나, sandblasting 군 및 무처리 대조군에 벼해서는 유의하게 높은 접착강도를 나타내었다(p<0.05). 3. Sandblasting만 시행 한 군은 무처리 대조군과 비교시 접착강도에 있어 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(p>0.05). 4. 파단면 관찰 결과, 모든 군에서 일부 접착계면에서의 파절을 포함하는 글래스아이오노머 베이스의 응집 파괴(cohesive failure) 양상이 가장 많이 나타났으며, sandblasting 및 silane 처리군과 silane 처리군에서는 sandblasting 군 및 무처리 대조군에 비해 상대적으로 적은 접 착계면에서의 파절(adhesive failure) 양상을 나타내었다. 5. 전단접착강도와 파절양상의 관계에서, 접착강도가 클수록 응집 파괴(cohesive failure) 양상이 많이 나타나는 경향을 보였다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.693-704
• /
• 1995

This study was performed to evaluate effective surface conditioning method of In-Ceram core to improve bonding with resin cement. The surface of each sample was avraded with glass bead for 20 seconds and then subjected to one of the following conditions : no modification, sandblasting with $50{\mu}m$ slumimum oxide powders for 20 seconds, etching with 20% hydrofluoric acid for 5, 10, and 15 minutes(half of the etched samples were coated with silane), and sandblasting with $250{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide powders and silica coating whith Silicoater MD system(Kulzer, Germany). The surface morphology changes were examined with scanning electronic microscope(SEM. and the shear bond strength of In-Ceram core samples to resin cement(Panavis 21, Kurayay, Japan) were measured. It was concluded that : 1. By SEM observation, 20% HF acid etching did not create clear microretentive structure and surface roughness diminished with increace in etching time. Sandblasting was more effective than 20% hydrofluoric acid etching in producing microretentive structure. 2. The bond strengths of all In-Ceram core samples surface conditioned were increased that that of control group. 3. Silica coating showed higher bond strength than etching with 20% hydrofluoric acid. 4. The use of silane coating was more effective in improving bond strength than lengthening etching time.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.379-386
• /
• 2003

Statement of problem. Resin cements are widely used in adhesive dentistry specially on all ceramic restorations. It is needed to find out adequate bonding strength between different porcelain surface treatments, commercially available porcelains, and different resin cement systems. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate shear bond strength of resin cements bonded to porcelains in three different modalities; 5 different porcelain surface treatments, 3 different resin cement systems and 3 different commercially available pressable porcelains. Material and Method. This study consisted of 3 parts. Part I examined the effect of five different surface treatments on the pressable porcelain. Fifty discs (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) of Authentic porcelain were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 10). The specimens were sanded with 320 grit SiC paper followed by 600 grit SiC paper. The specimens were treated as follow: Group 1-Sandblasting (aluminum oxide) only, Group 2 - sandblasting/ silane, Group 3 - sandblasting/ acid etching/ silane, Group 4 - acid etching only, Group 5 - acid etching/ silane. Part II examined the shear bond strength of 3 different resin cement systems (Duolink, Variolink II, Rely X ARC) on acid etching/ silane treated Authentic pressable porcelain. Part 3 examined the shear bond strength of Duolink resin cement on 3 different pressable porcelains (Authentic, Empress I, Finesse). All cemented specimens were stored in distilled water for 2 hours and tested with Ultradent shear bond strength test jig under Universal Instron machine until fracture. An analysis of variance(ANOVA) test was used to evaluate differences in shear bond strength. Result. The shear bond strength test resulted in the following: (1) Acid etched porcelains recorded greater shear bond strength values to the sandblasted porcelains. (2) Silane treated porcelains recorded greater shear bond strength values to non-silane treated porcelains. (3) There was no significant difference between sandblasting/ acid etching/ silane treated and acid etching/ silane treated porcelains. However those values were much higher than other three groups. (4) The shear bond strength with Variolink II was lower than the value of Duolink or Rely X ARC. (5) The shear bond strength of Finesse was lower than the value of Authentic or Empress I.