• 융합신호처리학회논문지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.128-133
• /
• 2021

최근 학생 및 사무직 종사자의 자세 불량으로 인한 척추계 질환의 발병율이 증가하고 있으며, 바른 자세 유지를 돕기 위한 다양한 연구가 수행되었다. 기존 연구에서는 의자 방석부분에 멤브레인 센서 또는 압력센서를 배치하여 무게의 편중을 보거나, 사용자를 구속하는 센서를 부착하여 체위변환을 측정하였다. 본 연구자는 선행연구에서 점착성 겔시트로 간편히 몸에 부착할 수 있으며, 사용자의 자세 및 체위 변화를 실시간으로 측정하여 출력하는 센서 디바이스를 개발하였으나 센서값의 정확성에서 한계점을 보였다. 본 연구에서는 체위변환 센서 디바이스의 성능을 개선하고, 각도변환 측정값의 정확도를 정량적으로 평가하는 연구를 수행하였으며, 오차율 2.53%의 높은 정확도를 확인하였다. 향후 연구에서는 멀티미디어 요소가 추가된 자세교정 훈련 컨텐츠를 보다 다양화하여 실제 사용자를 대상으로 하는 추가 연구가 필요한 것으로 사료된다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2014

PURPOSE. The accuracy of a gypsum model (GM), which was taken using a conventional silicone impression technique, was compared with that of a polyurethane model (PM), which was taken using an iTero$^{TM}$ digital impression system. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The maxillary first molar artificial tooth was selected as the reference tooth. The GMs were fabricated through a silicone impression of a reference tooth, and PMs were fabricated by a digital impression (n=9, in each group). The reference tooth and experimental models were scanned using a 3 shape convince$^{TM}$ scan system. Each GM and PM image was superimposed on the registered reference model (RM) and 2D images were obtained. The discrepancies of the points registered on the superimposed images were measured and defined as GM-RM group and PM-RM group. Statistical analysis was performed using a Student's T-test (${\alpha}=0.05$). RESULTS. A comparison of the absolute value of the discrepancy revealed a significant difference between the two groups only at the occlusal surface. The GM group showed a smaller mean discrepancy than the PM group. Significant differences in the GM-RM group and PM-RM group were observed in the margins (point a and f), mesial mid-axial wall (point b) and occlusal surfaces (point c and d). CONCLUSION. Under the conditions examined, the digitally fabricated polyurethane model showed a tendency for a reduced size in the margin than the reference tooth. The conventional gypsum model showed a smaller discrepancy on the occlusal surface than the polyurethane model.