• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.53 no.8
• /
• pp.597-604
• /
• 2020

Muskingum, a hydrologic channel flood routing, is a method of predicting outflow by using the relationship between inflow, outflow, and storage. As many studies for Muskingum model were suggested, parameters were gradually increased and the calculation process was complicated by many parameters. To solve this problem, an optimization algorithm was applied to the parameter estimation of Muskingum model. This study applied the Advanced Nonlinear Muskingum Model considering continuous flow (ANLMM-L) to Wilson flood data and Sutculer flood data and compared results of the Linear Nonsingum Model incorporating Lateral flow (LMM-L), and Kinematic Wave Model (KWM). The Sum of Squares (SSQ) was used as an index for comparing simulated and observed results. Exponential Bandwidth Harmony Search with Centralized Global Search (EBHS-CGS) was applied to the parameter estimation of ANLMM-L. In Wilson flood data, ANLMM-L showed more accurate results than LMM-L. In the Sutculer flood data, ANLMM-L showed better results than KWM, but SSQ was larger than in the case of Wilson flood data because the flow rate of Sutculer flood data is large. EBHS-CGS could be appplied to be appplicable to various water resources engineering problems as well as Muskingum flood routing in this study.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.7
• /
• pp.29-37
• /
• 2020

In the past, meta-heuristic optimization algorithms were developed to solve the problems caused by complex nonlinearities occurring in natural phenomena, and various studies have been conducted to examine the applicability of the developed algorithms. The self-adaptive vision correction algorithm (SAVCA) showed excellent performance in mathematics problems, but it did not apply to complex engineering problems. Therefore, it is necessary to review the application process of the SAVCA. The SAVCA, which was recently developed and showed excellent performance, was applied to the advanced Muskingum flood routing model (ANLMM-L) to examine the application and application process. First, initial solutions were generated by the SAVCA, and the fitness was then calculated by ANLMM-L. The new value selected by a local and global search was put into the SAVCA. A new solution was generated, and ANLMM-L was applied again to calculate the fitness. The final calculation was conducted by comparing and improving the results of the new solution and existing solutions. The sum of squares (SSQ) was used to calculate the error between the observed and calculated runoff, and the applied results were compared with the current models. SAVCA, which showed excellent performance in the Muskingum flood routing model, is expected to show excellent performance in a range of engineering problems.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2019.05a
• /
• pp.388-388
• /
• 2019

하도 홍수추적의 방법은 크게 수리학적 방법과 수문학적 방법으로 구분할 수 있다. 수리학적 홍수추적 방법은 정확하지만 대량의 자료가 필요하고 시간이 오래 걸린다. 이와 반대로 수문학적 홍수추적 방법은 정확성은 떨어지지만 소량의 자료만 있으면 되고 시간이 적게 걸린다. 여러 수문학적 홍수추적에 관한 연구들이 있으며 대표적으로 Muskingum 방법이 있다. Muskingum 방법 중 Linear Muskingum Model(LMM)은 방정식의 구조적 한계 때문에 정확한 홍수추적이 어려웠고, 이를 개선하기위하여 Nonlinear Muskingum Model(NLMM), Nonlinear Muskingum Model Incorporation Lateral Flow(NLMM-L) 및 Advanced Nonlinear Muskingum Model Incorporating Lateral Flow(ANLMM-L)이 제안되었다. 본 연구는 수문학적 홍수추적 중 Muskingum 방법의 결과 차이가 어떤 요인으로 인해 발생하는지 검토하였다. 최적화 알고리즘으로 화음탐색법(Harmony Search, HS)을 사용하였으며 LMM, NLMM, NLMM-L 및 ANLMM-L의 매개변수를 산정하였다. 각 방법에 적용 시 HS의 매개변수에 변화를 주어 민감도 분석을 실시하였으며, 분석을 위한 홍수자료는 The Willson Flood data (1947)를 선택하였다. 오차비교방법은 Sum of Squares(SSQ), Root Mean Square Errors(RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency(NSE)를 비교하였다. 비교 결과 알고리즘의 성능에 의한 차이보다 홍수추적 방법의 차이가 더 영향이 큰 것으로 나타났다.