• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.477-482
• /
• 2020

현재 사회서비스 공공성 강화에 따른 방향 제시는 이해관계자의 관점에서 각자의 유리한 방향으로 생각하고 있으며, 서비스 제공기관 입장과 이용자의 입장, 관리 주체인 시·도의 공공성의 정의와 평가에 대해서는 의견이 서로 다르다. 본 연구는 지역사회서비스를 중심으로 하는 공공성에 대한 의견을 종합하여 공공성의 정의와 평가에 대한 합의점을 도출하고, 서로 다른 지표를 가지고 있거나 계량화할 수 없는 요소들을 동시에 평가할 수 있는 기법으로 계층분석법(Analytic Hierarchy Process: AHP)을 적용하여 공공성의 문제점을 해결하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 또한, 설계된 프레임에 따라 연구목적을 달성하기 위하여 전문가를 대상으로 쌍대비교의 설문조사를 수행하여 실증 연구를 하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 AHP 평가모형을 통해 주요 요인들의 상대적 만족도를 측정한 결과 서비스이용률(0.470), 시설관리(0.210), 타 사업시행(0.073) 순으로 나타났다. 여기서 서비스이용률이 가장 중요하다 평가되었다.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.61-70
• /
• 2009

This study gives the quality factor evaluation of rubber gloves manufacturing, including a systematic classification of poor durability(internal quality factors) and look bad(external quality factors) as well as the types of defective items, along with the relationship between quality factors and the defective types. The relationship analysis between quality factors and the defective types are performed with AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique. The results of our study will be useful for quality management activities and manufacturing process in rubber gloves manufacturing companies.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.229-239
• /
• 2018

본 논문은 기존의 CCTV가 가진 문제점을 분석하고, 클라우드 컴퓨팅 환경에서의 IP-CCTV를 사용할 때, 보안문제점에 대하여 논한다. 클라우드 서비스 제공과 관련된 보안 위험을 단순히 위험 현상만 제거하는 실수를 줄이기 위해서는 위험 분석과 조치에 대한 효과적인 수행 방법이 필요하다. 이에 따라, Threat Risk Modeling의 STRIDE 모델을 통하여 위협 분석을 하고, 위협 분석된 내용을 토대로 Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) 방법론을 사용하여 위험 우선순위를 측정하였으며, 우선순위에 대한 적절한 해결방법이 무엇인지를 분석하였다.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.195-214
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to explore the applicability of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to select more productive projects among various proposed projects in a particular company. To achieve this research objective, the characteristics of project evaluation and selection are first reviewed with respect to when, where, and how the decision is made. Then the theoretical basis of the AHP is briefly reviewed along with its mathematical underpinnings to construct the framework of project evaluation and selection. To be more specific, the evaluation and selection criteria were reorganized in the AHP-based framework to make the process of project evaluation and selection more productive. Project evaluation and selection is one of the most important activities for the most companies to be more advantageous in the market. Despite the importance of decision making process of project selection, not many of how to choose the best project were suggested as the reliable project selection methods in the industries. It may be because it involves various activities related to conflict resolution among different evaluation criteria, high uncertainties of market, and the unclear tradeoff among various project objectives. Furthermore, the decision, once made at this point, tends to be irrevocable until the whole process turns out to be a complete success or failure. As the result, the AHP method showed better financial performance rather than the traditional method in a case study.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.23-37
• /
• 2005

On the situation cooperating with business partners on the supply chain, systematic decision making process is a critical issue for them. The two major issues of purchasing strategy such as selecting vendors and managing them are important part of their overall business activities. This study mainly focus on the former issue of the vendor selection. Through the empirical study, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was applied to select vendors among supplier vendors based on four selection criteria such as the level of quality, product on management ability, delivery, and price. The results of study showed the main criteria of vender selection was the ability of quality management. The vender selected based on AHP and the current selection method was different, but implicitly projected the dilemma situation between quality and price which occurs in decision making process of real life.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.101-110
• /
• 2018

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a systematic and objective decision method that stratifies multiple criteria to determine various evaluation factors' order of priority. Since AHP requires several stages of analysis with complicated attributes, they normally rely on computer programs for the execution of such analyses. However, the existing AHP analytic tools carry the inconvenience of having to repeatedly input massive amounts data generated in every stage. This repetitious data entry process results in prolonged analysis times and higher possibility of errors, leading to decreased reliability of the results. Thus, in this study, we develop an analytic tool that effectively simplifies the data entry process in AHP analysis, for the purpose of reducing analysis times and increasing the reliability of the results.

• 수산경영론집
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.19-45
• /
• 2007

There have not been many studies which considered both quantitative and qualitative location factors on the issues of site selection problems for a fish farm. This study develops AHP(analytic hierarchy process) model to resolve site selection problem for a fish raising farm by using quantitative and qualitative factors. In order to evaluate the validity of the location factors found in the literature review, the study used advice from fish raising farmers and related academic experts. Four major factors have been selected as economic factors, social factors, natural environmental factors and infrastructures. An AHP structural diagram has developed by considering the factors and potential sites proposed for fish farming. Through the survey on the preference of factors and potential sites, pairwise comparison matrices have been estimated and used to calculated the relative weights of each potential site. The AHP model process shown in the study can be applied to resolve site selection problems for fish raising farmers.

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.183-190
• /
• 2011

The paper is to analyze multi-attributes for expanding new renewable energy in agricultural sectors which have environmental, technical, economic, and social factors consisting of 15 attributes which have both positive and negative impacts. We applied the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to data from opinion polls. As a result of the AHP survey, the overall results indicate that the respondents more weight on economical factor than environmental, technical, and social factors for expanding new renewable energy. At the lowest level, a comparison of individual 15 attributes within three factors shows that fixed cost highest in multi-attributes, followed by operating cost, technical superiority. To achieve the public acceptance about expanding new renewable energy in agricultural sectors, the policy-makers should take all relevant factors into account through the decision-making process by the public opinions.

• 한국기술혁신학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회:발표자료
• /
• pp.369-385
• /
• 2001

A R&D project evaluation method has been applied for the national nuclear R&D projects in a developing-country setting. In the methodology, Saaty's analytic hierarchy process model is used to evaluate and rank of the selected nuclear R&D project which have a wide range of objectives and characteristics. The criteria used for evaluation related specifically to the Korea's evaluation needs and culture, and they are weighted according to their relative importance as perceived by the evaluator of the R&D project. As a real-world case of evaluation, we elicited and reproduced the evaluation process of the nuclear R&D projects which is going under the research process. As the results of the paper suggests, the methodology can be applied to the evaluation of the R&D projects and has much potential.

• Journal of information and communication convergence engineering
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.97-104
• /
• 2015

In this paper, we propose a data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) integrated model to improve the selection process in the acquisition of a weapon system which is the key component to the success of the project. In particular, we applied DEA in the first stage to choose a frontier group among the candidates in the selection process of the next-generation fighter system (the 3rd FX) in Korea. Then, by using the Delphi technique, we surveyed military experts and applied AHP to determine the best choice among the candidates. The results of the study match the actual decision made by the Korean government in the weapon system acquisition. The results of the proposed DEA-AHP integrated method in the selection of the next-generation fighter systems in Korea demonstrate the usefulness of the method. In this paper, we also discuss the future implications of the proposed model.