• 제목/요약/키워드: 1920s Soviet

검색결과 6건 처리시간 0.017초

1920년대 소비에트 구성주의 패션에 관한 연구 (A Study on Soviet Constructive Fashion in 1920s)

  • 조윤경;금기숙
    • 복식
    • /
    • 제36권
    • /
    • pp.183-203
    • /
    • 1998
  • The wave of Avant-garde swept away all in the unique social background so called 'October Revolution' and the early 1900 Russian society which was able to absorb and accept anything. The Russian avant-garde has been affected by the Cubism and the Futurism those had peculiarly appeared in the early twentieth century, spreaded out to three spheres: the Suprematism, the Rayonism and the Constructivism. The Russian Constructivism has appeared in this background, concretely and ideally ex-pressed the ideology of the revolution into the artistic form and made an huge influence to the whole Russian society. The Constructivist like Tatlin, naum Gabo, Pevaner, Rodchenko, Stepanova, Popova and Exter gave great effect on the Soviet Constructive fashion design in 1920's after the Revolution. The Soviet costume in 1920s hold in common the characteristicss of the Constructive graphic as it is, geometrical and abstractive form, energetic and motility. In fashion design, these graphic qualities have been showed as the application of geometrical form and architectural image, physical distortion and transformation. And in textile design, the simple, dynamical presentation has been appeared. We can classify the Soviet costume at this time into three occasions. The first term is from late 1910 th mid 1920, and it is altered from folk costume design to modern one. With Lamanova as the first on the list, using the folk mitif, the Constructive expression of simple form has been gradually revealed in design. Designers like Makarova, Pribylskaia and Mukhina produced the plane, simple chemise style with the decoration of the Russian traditional motif. From early to late 1920 is the second term, and it is at the pick of the most active processing of the Constructive design. Not only at the costume in daily life but also at the theatrical costume and textile, the con-structive design has been represented all avail-able fields. Many Constructivists including Stepanova, Popova, Exter and Rodchenko took part in the textile design and costume design so as to evlvo their aesthetic concept. The third term is from late 1920 to early 1930. The socialistic realism has dominated over the whole culture and art, the revolutionary dynamic motif has been presented also in textile design. The formative features of Soviet Constructive fashion design are; silhouette, from, motif, color and fabric. The first, the silhouette : a straight rectangular silhouetted has been expressed through the whole period and a volumed one with distorted human body shape has introduced in the theatrical costume design. The second, the form: many lengthened rectangular forms have been made at beginnings, but to the middle period, geometrical, architectural forms have been more showed and there are energy and movement in design. At the last period, only a partial feature-division has been seen. The third, the motif; no pattern or ethnic motif has been partly used at beginnings, a figure like circle, tri-angle has gradually appeared in textile design. At latter period, a real-existent motif like an airplane has been represented with graphing and simplicity. The fourth, the color ; because of insufficient dyeing, neutral color like black or grey color has been mainly covered, but after middle term, a primary color or pastel tone has been seen, contrast of the fabric; without much development of textile industry after the Revolution, thick and durable fabrics have been the main stream, but as time had going to the last period, fabrics such as linen, cotton, velvet and silk have been varously choesn. At the theatrical costume, new materials like plastics and metals that were able to accentuate the form. The pursuit of popularity, simplicity and functionalism that the basic concept of Constructive fashion is one of the "beauty" which has been searching in modern fashion. And now we can appreciate how innovative and epochal this Soviet Constructive fashion movement was.ement was.

  • PDF

소비에트 무성영화의 지가 베르토프 영화이론 -세르게이 에이젠슈테인의 몽타주론을 비교중심으로- (Dziga Vertov's Film Theory of Soviet Silent Film -By Comparison between Montage Theory of Sergei Eisenstein and Dziga Vertov Film Theory-)

  • 전평국;김노익
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제10권8호
    • /
    • pp.147-158
    • /
    • 2010
  • 1920년대 소비에트 무성영화는 세계영화사에 있어 문화 예술적 측면에서 찬란한 번영을 일으켰다. 그 중에서도 지가 베르토프(Dziga Vertov)는 세르게이 에이젠슈테인(Sergei M. Eisenstein)과 함께 당대 소비에트 영화의 핵심적 역할을 행사한 최고의 영화이론가이자 실천가였다. 하지만 베르토프의 영화이론은 오늘날까지도 에이젠슈테인에 비해 상대적으로 잘못 인식되거나 전수된 점이 많았다. 그러나 들뢰즈는 베르토프의 영화에 나타난 쇼트 자체가 어떤 의미나 충격을 전달할 수 있으며, 다큐멘터리가 지녀야할 '진실'에 초점을 맞춰 쇼트 자체에서도 의미를 이뤄낼 수 있다고 역설했다. 그의 영화이론은 미래주의와 구성주의에 바탕을 두어 '영화-눈'이라는 방법과 '간격'이라는 이론을 통한 '영화-진실'이라는 원리 그리고 '생활 있는 그대로'의 개념으로 요약 정리된다. 따라서 본 연구는 베르토프 영화이론의 핵심인 키노아이와 간격이론 등을 중심으로 에이젠슈테인의 몽타주론과 비교하면서 들뢰즈의 이미지론을 적용하며 심도 있게 분석 조망하고자 한다. 나아가 선행연구의 미비로 인한 베르토프의 영화사적 업적을 논의하기에는 역부족일 수도 있으나, 그의 다큐멘터리 영화 표현양식에 있어 혁신적인 방법과 그의 이론을 심층적으로 연구할 것이다.

『아담과 이브』: 소비에트 슈제트와 M.불가코프의 패러디 ("Adam and Eve" - Soviet Plot and Parody of M.A. Bulgakov)

  • 강수경;양민종
    • 비교문화연구
    • /
    • 제22권
    • /
    • pp.7-27
    • /
    • 2011
  • This article is devoted to little-studied play of M.A. Bulgakov "Adam and Eve". By the end of 1920's - the beginning of 1930's soviet society is differentiated again, its construction is rebuilded. In the new condition drama is needed as much as possible. Drama on the stage is ideal model for instruction of "Mass". Thereupon soviet society asked "New Hero", "New play", which can rebuild soviet citizen in the new construction of government. Thereby the play of M.A. Bulgakov "Adam and Eve" is created by order of soviet society. In this play typical soviet people are represented: Adam Krasovsky(engineer), Daragan(pilot-terminator), Ponchik-Nepobeda(writer), Zahar Markizov(proletarian-baker). They are different from each other by their occupation and formation, but they have same consciousness and they think identically. Bulgakov makes stand such problems: impersonality and unfreedom of human being in the government of communism. Bulgakov, using Parody, doubt the possibility of realization of utopia of Soviet government. Bulgakov show to us that Adam Krasocsky is not real Adam-first human being. In the play we can see the real Adam is the scientist-intelligent Efrosimov. Bulgakov change the place of Ponchik with the place of Markizov. The idiot and the fool is recognized not Markisov-drinker, tyrant, but Ponchik-writer. After the disaster Markisov, reading a Bible, is changing and by the end of play he started writing his own novel. Indeed if Ponchik wrote hoked-up novel, Markisov writes a real own history. Request of Leningrad Theater for Bulgakov to write about the future war comes from the spirit of the time. But Bulgakov in this play "Adam and Eve" could insist that the "Life" is a supreme value.

소련 초기의 기록관리제도와 그 변화 (The Organization of the Archival Systems and Their Transformations in the first period of the Soviet UnionAn Essay for Reconstruction on the Classification System of Government-General of Chosun)

  • 조호연
    • 기록학연구
    • /
    • 제10호
    • /
    • pp.324-370
    • /
    • 2004
  • This paper aims to research the historical development of the archival systems in the Soviet Union from 1917 to the 1920's. The Russian revolution was the turning point not only for the political and social changes but for the archival administration in Russia, as it provided the new Soviet regime with the chances to reorganize the archival institutions under Bolshevik rule. However, we must not forget the fact that the Russian Archival Workers' Union had taken part in the organization of the archival systems together with the Bolshevik revolutionaries. The Soviet government intended to transform the decentralized and poorly organized archival systems in the prerevolutionary years into the centralized and bureaucratized ones. In this meaning, the decree signed be V. I. Lenin on 1 June 1918 was estimated as the real basis for the Soviet archival centralization. Lenin's archival decree of 1918 encompassed the entire national documentary legacy, which was gradually extended to all types and categories of manuscripts and archival records by successive legislation. The concept of state proprietorship of all documentary records was designated "Single State Archival Fond"(Edinyi Gosudarstvennyi arkhivnyi fond), which was renamed as "Archival Fond of the Russian Federation" after the collapse of the USSR. The independent state administrative agency, that is, "Main Administration of Archival Affairs"(Glavnoe upravlenie arkhivnym delom) was charged with the management of the entire "Single State Archival Fond". While the Soviet Union reorganized its archival systems in the twenties, the archival institutions became under the severe control of the government. For example, M. N. Pokrovskii, the well-known Marxist historian and the political leader, headed the organizational work of archives in the Soviet Union, which resulted in the exclusion of the prerevolutionary specialists from the archival field in the Soviet Union. However, the discussions over the concept of "the Archival Fond" by B. I. Anfilov helped to develop the archival theories in the USSR in the twenties. In conclusion, the Soviet Union, having emphasized the centralization of the archives, developed its archival systems from the early period, which were the basis of the systematic archival institutions in Russia.

러시아혁명 이후부터 1930년대까지의 소련의 기록관리제도 (The Soviet Archival System from the Russian Revolution to the 1930's)

  • 조호연
    • 한국기록관리학회지
    • /
    • 제4권2호
    • /
    • pp.23-39
    • /
    • 2004
  • 1917년에 발발한 러시아혁명은 사회주의 정권의 수립이라는 점 이외에도 기록물관리제도라는 측면에서 볼 때에도 러시아 역사의 전환점을 이루었다. 우선 법적인 측면으로 보자면, 소련 정부는 러시아 혁명 직후인 1918년 6월 1일에 공포한 "러시아사회주의연방의 기록업무의 재조직 및 중앙집중화에 관하여"라는 법을 통하여 기록물 관리의 기반을 닦아놓았다. 레닌에 의하여 서명된 이 법은 1920년대 들어서 수정 및 보완 과정을 거치다가 1929년 4월에 "러시아소비에트사회주의연방공화국의 기록관리에 관한 법"으로 연결되었다. 이를 통하여 소련은 단일국가기록폰드로부터 국가기록폰드로의 개념적인 발전을 이룸과 아울러, 국가기록폰드의 대상을 보다 확대시켜놓을 수 있었다. 뿐만 아니라, 이 법으로 인하여 소련 정부가 중앙기록물관리기관의 역할을 크게 확대시키고 다양화시켜놓았다는 점도 주목할 만한 사실이었다. 또한 기록물의 보존 기간도 새롭게 규정됨으로써 기술적인 측면에서도 기록물의 보존 업무가 개선되었다는 측면도 무시할 수 없었다. 그런데 문제는 이 법령이 순수하게 기록물 관리와 관계된 법적인 토대를 정비하는 데에만 그치지는 않았다는 점에 있었다. 더구나 이 법령이 공포된 시점은 스탈린이 명실상부하게 소련의 최고 권력자로 부상하여 스탈린 시대의 막을 연 때였다. 따라서 이 법은 공업화나 농업 집단화와 마찬가지로 중앙의 강력한 통제력을 기록관리 분야에다가 적용시킨 사례라고 말할 수도 있었다. 이 점은 1929년 5월 25일부터 6월 1일 사이에 개최된 러시아소비에트연방사회주의공화국의 기록관리종사자들의 제2차 대회에서 분명히 확인될 수 있었다. 러시아 혁명 이후 기록물 관리 분야의 주요 책임자 중 한 사람이었던 포크로프스키가 이 대회를 마지막으로 더 이상 영향력을 발휘할 수 없게 되었던 예에서 분명히 알 수 있듯이, 소련의 기록전문가들이 가지고 있던 자율성은 1929년 법이 제정된 이후로 점차로 축소되어가고 있었다. 러시아 혁명 이후의 중앙기록물관리기구도 법적인 측면과 유사한 변화 과정을 겪게 되었다. 소련 시기에 설치된 최초의 중앙기록물 관리기구인 기록관리총국은 스탈린 체제가 강화되던 1929년에 이르러 중앙기록관리부로 재편되었다. 이와 동시에 기록관리기구라는 측면에서 의미 있는 사건은 소련의 개별 공화국이 아니라 소련 전체를 대상으로 하는 소련중앙기록관리부가 설치되었다는 사실이었다. 그렇지만 소련의 기록관리 업무는 대숙청이라는 시대적인 배경을 두고 결국 기록관리총국을 통하여 소련내무인민위원부의 직접적인 통제하에 들어가고 말았다.

Review on Historical Assessment and Perception of Dziga Vertov

  • Jeon, Pyoung-Kuk
    • International Journal of Contents
    • /
    • 제4권4호
    • /
    • pp.24-29
    • /
    • 2008
  • In 1920s, Soviet silent films enjoyed unprecedentedly great prosperity throughout world film history. Particularly, Dziga Vertov could develop 'montage' in collaboration with Sergei Eisenstein and thereby could work as the engines behind development and leap of Soviet films toward 'new concepts' of 'new films' worldwide. However, Vertov's original reputations - the best film theorist and avant-gardist as well as great cineaste in his contemporary age - have been misunderstood or underestimated, so that he has been still misestimated or distorted as radical formalist and documentary propagandist. In regard to these points, this study aims to take Gilles Deleuze's modal esthetic approaches to further considering and historically re-highlighting D. Vertov's film theories that are based on the principle of 'film-reality' and the concept of 'Life As It Is' according to 'kino-eye' method and 'interval' theory as a part of futurism and constructivism breaking down any attribute of traditional narrative films.