• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.98-103
• /
• 2012

The repair technique of rotator cuff tear has been markedly developed in recent years. When the natural history of rotator cuff tear was followed, the size of rotator cuff tear increased with time. The fatty infiltration which would come at the later period of rotator cuff tear and the rotator cuff tear arthropathy which would be occurred after massive rotator cuff tear may be the important factors in predicting the prognosis of rotator cuff tear or determining the timing of surgery. Because moderate supraspinatus fatty infiltration appeared an average of 3 years after onset of symptoms, the repair of rotator cuff tear was recommended to be performed before that. And if there was massive rotator cuff tear with cuff tear arthropathy, it was recommended that the rotator cuff repair should be performed before the occurrence of the narrowing of acromiohumeral interval. The techniques of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were mainly the single row repair and the double row repair. The former is good in view of time consuming and cost, but the latter is superior in view of biomechanics. To maintain the benefit in biomechanics of double row technique and reduce the time of surgery, the suture-bridge technique was invented and widely used recently. There are several modified techniques in arthroscopic suture-bridge technique according to the characteristics of rotator cuff tear.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.82-89
• /
• 2008

Ideal rotator cuff repair is to maintain high fixation strength and minimize gap formation for optimizing the environment of biologic healing of tendon to bone. Among the current repair techniques, the suture bridge technique is superior to single- or double-row repair in ultimate load to failure, gap formation, restoring anatomical footprint and achieving pressurized contact area. The suture bridge technique also minimizes gap formation and has rotational and torsional resistances allowing early rehabilitation. However, despite superior biomechanical characteristics of the suture bridge technique, there is no evidence that these mechanical advantages result in better clinical outcomes. Furthermore, there is no difference in failure rates between the double-row repair and suture bridge techniques. An appropriate repair technique should be determined based on tear size and pattern and tendon quality.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.98-99
• /
• 2004

소절개 봉합술은 관혈적 봉합술에 비해 동반된 관절와 상완 관절(glenohumeral joint) 내의 병변을 확인하고 이에 대한 처치를 시행할 수 있으며, 견봉하 감압술과 함께 동반된 견봉 쇄골 관절의 병변을 치료할 수 있다. 또한 삼각근 기시부에 대한 손상을 최소화하기 때문에 빠른 재활과 조기 퇴원을 시행할 수 있는 등의 장점이 있다 관절경적 봉합술에 비해서는 수술 술기가 어렵지 않기 때문에 항상 좋은 결과를 기대할 수 있다 회전근 개 파열에 대한 수술을 시행할 때 관절경적 봉합술이 모든 경우에서 관혈적 또는 소절개 봉합술에 비해 좋은 결과를 나타내는 것은 아니다. 환자가 심한 골다공증이 있는 경우, 기술적 문제가 있는 경우, 봉합 후 회전근 개에 지나친 긴장이 염려될 때는 항상 소절개 봉합술로의 전환을 시도하여야 한다. 소절개 봉합술을 시행한 경우에도 관절경적 봉합술시와 비슷한 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있고, 치료의 결과는 수술의 방법보다는 정확한 술기 및 수술 전 환자의 상태에 좌우된다고 하겠다.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.155-159
• /
• 2007

Arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair is a well established surgical technique for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. However, the problem of postoperative retear remains a concern. Various avenues are being explored to address this problem. Some studies have suggested that restoring the anatomical footprint may improve the healing and initial strength of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. The double-row technique was introduced as a method of reconstructing the anatomical footprint. According to biomechanical studies on cadavers, this technique improved mechanical strength and reduced gap formation. However, the biological properties of reattached tendon such as tension, and vascularity have not been proved yet. Furthermore, the apparent mechanical superiority of the double-row over the single-row construction has not resulted in better functional outcomes. Therefore, the less complicated and less costly single-row technique is still the recommended treatment for rotator cuff repairs.

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.54 no.2
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 2019

Most patients experience pain relief and functional improvement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In some patients, however, symptoms still remain after surgery. Failed rotator cuff repair is a complex outcome of biological, technical, and traumatic factors. Moreover, re-tears might or might not be the main cause for patients with persistent pain after rotator cuff repair. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the patient's history, physical examination, and appropriate imaging studies will be needed to evaluate and manage these patients. The patient's age, functional requirement, quality of the rotator cuff, preoperative range of motion, quality of the deltoid, and glenohumeral arthritis are factors to consider before performing revisional rotator cuff repair. Preoperative patient education is as important as the surgical technique for successful revisional rotator cuff repair.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.167-174
• /
• 2010

Purpose: Anatomical repair of massive rotator cuff tear has been technically challenging because of medial retraction, muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration. Among several treatment options for massive rotator cuff tear, we reviewed rotator cuff repairs and investigated modalities for improvement of clinical outcomes, decreasing the re-tear rate, and increasing healing. Materials and Methods: Patient-related factors and rotator cuff-related factors were the two major groups of factors we considered when choosing a treatment plan. Results: Mobilization of a massive rotator cuff tear was increased by soft tissue release and by the interval slide technique. After meticulous soft tissue release, anatomical repair could be achieved. If the injury was not amenable to anatomical repair, alternative treatment options such as partial repair, the margin convergence technique and augmentation with a tenotomized biceps tendon were considered. Many reports of massive rotator cuff repair demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes, decreased pain, recovery of shoulder functions, and increases in muscle strength. However, the re-tear rate had been reported to be relatively high in long-term follow-up. Conclusion: Despite a high re-tear rate after massive rotator cuff repair, a better understanding of the pathogenesis, progression and clinical symptoms of massive rotator cuff tear and improved surgical materials and techniques will lead to satisfactory clinical outcomes.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2008.03a
• /
• pp.125-126
• /
• 2008

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.77-81
• /
• 2008

The goal of rotator cuff repairs is to achieve high initial fixation strength, minimize gap formation, maintain mechanical stability under cyclic loading and optimize the biology of the tendon-bone interface until the cuff heals biologically to the bone. Single row repairs are least successful in restoring the footprint of the rotator cuff and are most susceptible to gap formation. Double row repairs have an improved load to failure and minimal gap formation. Transosseous equivalent repairs (suture bridge technique) have the highest ultimate load and resistance to shear and rotational forces and the lowest gap formation. Even though the superior advantages of double row and transosseous equivalent repairs, those techniques take longer surgical time and are more expensive than single row repairs. Therefore single row repairs can be useful in bursal side partial thickness or small size full thickess rotator cuff tear.

• 대한관절경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2009.10a
• /
• pp.138-139
• /
• 2009

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.8-12
• /
• 2006

회전근 개 파열이 왜 통증을 일으키며 어떤 경우 통증을 일으키는가에 대해 아직도 모르는 부분이 많다. 그러나 생 역학적으로 회전근 개 질환을 이해하고 접근하면 순리적으로 풀어져 나가는 부분도 많다. 회전근 개가 파열되었어도 통증이 미약하다면 수술보다는 적극적인 보존적 치료가 원칙이다. 만약 수술을 하는 경우 고식적인 방법으로 충분한 경험을 쌓은 후 관절경술을 시도하여야 한다. 물론 최근 관절경술로 파열된 회전근 개를 봉합하여 주는 것이 선호되고 있으며 치료 결과 역시 관절경술이 더 좋을 수는 있으나 불안정성과 마찬가지로 전례에서 가능한 것도 아니고 만족한 결과를 모든 정형외과 의사가 공히 얻는 것은 아니다. 특히 회전근 개 봉합술은 고도의 관절경술 수기가 요구되는 것이므로 충분한 연마가 요구된다.