• 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회논문지
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.321-331
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 간호대학생의 의사소통능력, 임상수행능력, 인수인계 경험, 인수인계 자기효능감을 파악하고 인수인계 자기효능감에 영향을 미치는 요인을 규명하여 인수인계 교육프로그램을 개발하는데 기초자료를 제공하고자 수행되었다. 연구방법은 서술적 조사연구로서 G시에 소재한 4년제 2개교 간호대학생 255명을 2019년 6월부터 9월까지 구조화된 설문지를 통해 자료수집하였다. 자료분석은 t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficents 그리고 단계적 다중회귀분석을 활용하였다. 연구결과, 간호대학생들의 의사소통능력은 57.3점(100점 만점에 76.4점), 임상수행능력은 69.8점(100점 만점에 73.5점), 인수인계 자기효능감은 33.8점(100점 만점에 51.2점)으로 나타났다. 간호대학생의 인수인계 자기효능감은 성(F=4.60, p<.001), 연령(F=16.72, p<.001), 학년(t=-6.39, p<.001), 임상실습 만족도(F=3.68, p=.027), 인수인계 교육 경험(t=26.44, p<.001), 인수인계 경험(t=4.84, p<.001), 인수인계에 대한 두려움(F=16.97, p<.001), 환자안전에 있어서 인수인계 중요도(F=6.42, p=.002)에 따라 유의한 차이를 보였다. 간호대학생의 의사소통능력, 임상수행능력, 인수인계 자기효능감 간의 상관관계를 분석한 결과, 인수인계 자기효능감은 의사소통능력(r=.249, p<.001)과 임상수행능력(r=.426, p<.001) 간에 유의한 순 상관 관계가 있었다. 간호대학생의 인수인계 자기효능감에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 인수인계에 대한 두려움(β=-.294, p<.001), 임상수행능력(β=.252, p<.001), 학년(β=.191, p=.001), 인수인계 경험(β=.185, p<.001), 성별(β=.150, p=.003), 인수인계 교육 경험(β=.126, p=.017)순으로 모형의 설명력은 40.0%이었다. 결론적으로 간호대학생들의 인수인계 자기효능감을 높이기 위해서는 임상수행능력을 향상시키고 임상실습 시 인수인계 경험을 포함한 인수인계 교육을 제공하여 인수인계 두려움을 감소시키는 인수인계 교육프로그램의 개발이 필요하다.

• 중환자간호학회지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.13-22
• /
• 2015

Purpose: This study identified the current status and perception of intensive care unit nurses' handover. Methods: A cross sectional descriptive survey was employed. The population included nurse managers and staff nurses who worked in intensive care units in hospitals with more than 500 beds and excluded nursing homes, psychiatric hospitals, and military hospitals. Results: Of the nurses, 61.7% were satisfied with the current handover method, 68.36% had no handover-related guidelines, and 83.2% of them perceived that the handover was important for patients' safety. The most frequent cause for errors related to handover was that the "nursing workload is heavy." The nurses perceived that their handover was informative ($5.62{\pm}0.79$) and efficient ($5.04{\pm}0.98$). The variables associated with their perception of the handover were the level of satisfaction with the current handover method, existence of handover guidelines, and importance of handover for patient safety. Conclusion: The development of standardized handover guidelines, especially for intensive care units, is necessary to reduce handover time and errors and to improve handover quality for patients'safety and high standards of nursing care.

• 중환자간호학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a nursing handoff protocol for intensive care units and test its relevance. Methods: This is a methodological research to develop a protocol. A preliminary protocol was developed by composing items and testing content validity through literature review and experts' review. We revised and complemented the preliminary protocol following practical relevance assessment of 38 intensive care unit nurses at a university hospital to test content validity and to assess practical relevance of the final protocol. Results: On the basis of the content validity test for the final protocol, 40 items were adopted. The scores for the practical relevance of the final protocol increased significantly for items such as accuracy of handoff, reduction of handoff-related errors, convenience in using the protocol, reduction in handoff time, and simplification of handoff. Conclusions: The nursing handoff protocol for intensive care units in this study is expected to improve nursing performance with a standardized handoff in intensive care units, promote patient safety, and improve communication among the medical staff.

• 임상간호연구
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.223-232
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to apply patient-engaged bedside handoffs in comprehensive care units, and to evaluate the effects of bedsides to nurses and patients. Methods: This study employed a cluster randomized cross-over design.Electrical Medical Record (EMR)-based handoffs and patient-engaged bedside handoffs were alternatively applied to 104 patients, who were assigned to a total of 30 clusters (nursing handoff teams) in 4 comprehensive care units at the S medical center in Seoul, and the patients evaluated each type of handoffs. A total of 139 nurses were also participated in the same units and evaluated each type of handoffs. Data were analyzed using t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, ANOVA, and Kruskal-Walls test. Results: The patient's satisfaction of the patient-engaged bedside handoffs was higher than that of the EMR-based handoffs (Z=-5.16, p<.001). On the other hand, the nurse's satisfaction of the patient-engaged bedside handoffs was significantly lower than that of the EMR-based handoffs (t=13.21, p<.001). There were no differences in length of the reporting time between two types of handoffs (t=-0.48, p=.634). Conclusion: Patient satisfaction with the patient-engaged bedside handoffs was higher than that of EMR-based handoffs, and nurses' satisfaction with the patient-engaged bedside handoffs was significantly lower than that of EMR-based handoffs. Future studies are needed regarding the impacts of patient-engaged bedside handoffs on the quality of healthcare by identifying the benefits of the handoffs.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.243-253
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the impact of practical communication strategies (PCS) on the reduction of AEs (Adverse Events) in pediatric cardiac ICU (PCICU). Methods: Intra-operative findings and care plans were documented and shared between staff members on a daily basis from the day of operation to the day of general ward transfer. Incidence of AEs was investigated in all patients who were admitted to the PCICU and was compared with incidence of AEs one year after establishment of PCS. Results: The study population consisted of 216 patients in pre-PCS group and 156 patients in post-PCS group. Incidence of readmission decreased from 6.0% (13/216) in pre-PCS group to 0.6% (1/156) in post-PCS group (${\chi}^2=7.23$, p=.010). Incidence of other major complications decreased from 4.2% (9/216) to 0.6% (${\chi}^2=6.66$, p=.012). Minor AEs such as intervention omission, order error, and protocol misunderstanding were reduced from 23.3 cases per 100 patient-days to 7.5 cases per 100 patient-days (${\chi}^2=20.31$, p<.001). Conclusion: Handover protocol is an effective strategy to reduce AEs for critically ill patients after pediatric cardiac surgery. Efforts to develop effective communication strategies should be continued and outcome research about communication strategies for patient safety should be further studied.