• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.271-278
• /
• 2006

IT 조직의 활동에 대한 성과 평가는 과거 재무적인 평가방법이 주를 이루었으나 최근에는 정보시스템 기능과 활동 주체가 다양해짐에 따라 재무적인 접근방법과 함께 새로운 평가 방법 및 기준에 대한 연구가 진행되고 있다. 특히 균형 성과표 (Balanced Scorecard: BSC) 개념을 IT 활동 평가에 적용한 IT-BSC에 대한 연구도 이루어지고 있다. 그러나 정보시스템과 기업전략과의 관계에 대한 규명이나, 다양한 IT 성과측정지표들간의 연계성을 측정하는 연구는 이루어지고 있지 않은 실정이다. 이에 본 본 연구에서는 IT 조직의 성과평가를 위한 핵심성공요인(CSF)과 핵심성과지표(KPI)를 도출하고, 도출된 지표간의 인과관계를 검증하고자 한다. 본 연구의 결과로 도출된 영역과 지표들은 각 산업영역에서 IT 조직의 성과를 측정할 때 참고하고 적용할 수 있는 효과적인 지침으로 활용될 수 있다는 데에 연구의 의미를 둘 수 있다.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.83-97
• /
• 2011

CRM (Customer relationship management) has become increasingly relevant in the public sector as citizens have become accustomed to high levels of service in private sectors. Public sectors have begun to emphasize on their customers and customer service quality. Thus to improve the service quality in citizens, public sectors conduct several types of surveys to analyze customer satisfaction and employee satisfaction on their product/services. Most of the public sector organizations, however, are reluctant to conduct the total survey targeting the whole teams and analyze the relationship among types of surveys because of the limitation of budget and time. In this paper, we propose the methodology to analyze the relationship of customer satisfaction index, employee satisfaction index and KPI achievement of whole teams and a framework which identifies key action initiatives and builds KPI.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.125-142
• /
• 2013

As a reinforcing strategic-alignment of IT business, Financial Service becomes more rely on IT systems. It needs to continuous information security activities to provide a secure and reliable finance service. Performance measurement of information security activities can be useful for decision and management support. The purpose of this study is to derive CSF(Critical Success Factor) and KPI(Key Performance Indicator) based on K-ISMS, Financial IT Information Security Standards. Providing a rationale can be used to determine key performance indicators, which are utilized as basic data for establishing security policies for financial IT security competency.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.97-109
• /
• 2024

This research aims to investigate how major cities in Korea utilize smart city-related technologies, develop key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the smartness and efficiency of cities, and propose a methodology for assessing and suggesting smart city policy directions based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Referring to the CITYkeys Smart City Performance Measurement Framework, 10 key performance indicators (KPIs) were derived. For each KPI, city statistical data were allocated to input and output variables, and 15 cities were assigned as Decision Making Units (DMUs). The DEA methodology was employed to evaluate the operational efficiency and scale profitability of cities, providing insights into the operational efficiency of each city. Finally, the operational efficiency among DMUs was ranked to propose smart city policy directions for each city.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2004.05a
• /
• pp.67-70
• /
• 2004

카플란과 노턴에 의해 1992년에 처음 소개된 BSC (Balanced Scorecard)의 '재무', '고객', '내부프로세스' 그리고 '학습과 성장'의 4개 시각 중 '학습과 성장' 시각의 핵심성과지표를 도출하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다. 기존 연구에서 제시된 평가 지표의 한계점을 제시하고 성과지표 도출의 근원을 조직 행동론에서 제시하고 있는 성과개념과 과정이론에서 밝혀냄으로서 '학습과 성장'시각의 목표인 다른 세 시각의 하부구조 및 동인을 달성하고자 조직 행동이론 관점의 핵심성과지표를 제시하고자 한다. 또한 정보기술이 기업의 장기적인 역랑을 배가시키고 경쟁우위를 확보하기 위한 전략적 수단으로 인식됨에 따라 정보기술의 역할 및 효과성에 대한 측정과 평가가 중요한 이슈로 떠오르고 있기 때문에 '학습과 성장' 시각에서 인적자원의 역랑과의 균형있는 정보기술 역량을 측정하고 평가할 수 있는 지표를 제시하고자 한다. 이는 기업 경영활동의 근간이 되는 구성원과 단위조직, 그리고 정보기술이 기업성과데 미치는 영향을 정확히 파악하고 그 결과를 구성원과 조직의 보상체계로 연결시킬 수 있는 객관적인 잣대로서 작용하게 된다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.41 no.4
• /
• pp.273-294
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to focus on developing the performance indicators for the distribution of scholarly information based on BSC and to analyze the importance of the performance indicators against the specialists. From the case studies on performance indicators both at home and abroad four viewpoints(information resource, information service, user, and economy) were derived. In addition. the core success factors(CSF) and key performance indicators(KPI) were extracted from the viewpoints. Four viewpoints are composed of 12 CSF items and 31 KPI items. In order to analyze the weight of the performance indicators. questions were thrown to the specialists in universities and research institutes. For the method of analysis, analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was adopted. As a result, the analysis showed that the user viewpoint, information service viewpoint, information resource viewpoint and economic viewpoint are in the order of their importance.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.254-264
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to develop a performance measurement factor of Balanced Scorecard(BSC) for health-care organization. We did also the research to evaluate the validity and reliability of these indicators. Fifty six health-care organizations are participated in a survey questionnaires. This questionnaires consists of 53-questions, which are the performance evaluation indicators designed by researcher, which are based on the Norton and Kaplan's BSC-Framework. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to analyze the weight and significances of each factor. Factor analysis of the BSC resulted in 11 major measurement factors (Eigenvalue >1.0). The AHP analysis showed the list of the hospital BSC measurement factors and its KPI(Key Performance Indicator) weighted by its significance priorities. The recommendable degree of reliability and validity of these BSC factors suggests that these factors are adequate for performance measurements of the health-care organizations in Korea.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.33-50
• /
• 2004

This paper presents the evaluation model which is included in a quantitative evaluation methodology for evaluation processes of validity and effectiveness of information budget investment and improving conformance of ROI(Return On Investment). That is, the right efficiency targets of information investment for the development project to GDOC (Government electronic Document Distribution Center), and KPls(Key Performance Indexes) which enable to evaluate objectively effectiveness in the preliminary and post evaluation phases are developed, and then the results were come out by practical investigation study using quantitative evaluation methodology.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.29-55
• /
• 2012

In order to successfully adopt and implement the Balanced Scorecard(BSC), firms need to respond adequately to the rapid changes of today's business environment and consider the growing importance of non financial factors in the business activities such as intangible assets(R&D expenditure, patent, goodwill, etc.). Our primary focus throughout this paper is on developing Key Performance Index(KPI) of BSC for R&D expenditure activities. In this study, we have developed and named PEI(Patent Efficiency Index),which is the KPI for R&D expenditure by focusing on the efficiency of a patent that is the output from the R&D expenditures. Secondarily, we have attempted to address the solution for the current problems of the traditional R&D performance measurement by using our developed PEI and examine the usefulness and effectiveness of the newly developed our PEI. According to the empirical test results, we find that the PEI is positively associated with ROA and Tobin's Q, respectively and show that our developed PEI is more effective and accurate than the traditional R&D performance measurement as a business performance measurement. Furthermore, these findings proves that we can measure and evaluate how efficiently the firms perform the R&D activities and shows that the PEI can be a critical index for evaluating firm's business performance related to the R&D expenditures.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.111-121
• /
• 2004

This paper presents the methods of evaluating validity and effectiveness of informatization budget investment for e-Government, through the preliminary evaluation. the progress evaluation and the Post evaluation of the investment, and a quantitative evaluation model which improves conformance of IT ROI (Return On Investment) using the evaluation results. the right evaluation targets of informatization investment for the development project to GDOC(Government electronic Document Distribution Center), and KPIs(Key Performance Indexes) which is enable to evaluate objectively effectiveness in the preliminary and the post evaluation phases are developed, and according to using the quantitative evaluation model . improved effectiveness evaluation results for each index in the point of view of usage and innovation are come out.