• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.1 s.227
• /
• pp.68-77
• /
• 1998

주변국의 해양세력을 억제하고 견제하기 위해서는 해군력이 필수적이며, 미래의 해상전은 컴퓨터 기술을 무기체계 제어기술에 접목시킨 4차원 교전개념이 될 것이다. 해군의 역할 증대와 군사과학 기술의 변화 그리고 미래 전쟁 양상에 비추어 양보다도 정확성이 요구되는 무기체계의 개발이 요구된다.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.2 s.228
• /
• pp.28-37
• /
• 1998

21세기에는 신영토를 둘러싼 치열한 각축전을 예측할 수 있다. 신영토 방위를 위한 해군의 역할은 증대될 것이며 첨단무기체계를 요구하게 된다. 해군 무기체계의 변화는 장차 정보전, 정밀타격전, 복합입체전이라는 전쟁 양상에 대처할 수 있게 꾸준히 개발될 것이다.

• Maritime Security
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.83-107
• /
• 2023

To Republic of Korea in the Indo-Pacific region, the stability and prosperity of the area are directly coupled with national survival, interest. Currently, on account of strategic competition between U.S.A, and China in this area as well as supranational·non-conventional threats, the security environment is unstable, required joint/allied responses. So, lots of states inside(U.S.A., Japan, ASEAN, etc.), also, out of this Indo-Pacific area like EU-NATO, open their own strategy related in Indo-Pacific issues to be involved. R.O.K. government took its own line with publishing self strategy following this international trend, it can be shown korean government's strong intend to join in the pending security issues in this region with 'strategic clarity'. Now, R.O.K. Navy has to back up governments, policy. First, R.O.K. Navy should strengthen the relationship inside and take part in the multilateral cooperation of security. Second, to convey this deterrence message to potential threats, Navy is required to show of forces and have combined exercises. Also, as naval forces of advanced countries, Korea, Navy should be taken action in non-traditional threats, and help developing states improve their sea power. To fulfill this tasks in the wide ocean area, Navy need five inherent characteristics(mobility, flexibility, sustainability, capability of presence and projection). In the end, this paper propose the development plan following operational environment (SWOT) analysis as well.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.10 s.200
• /
• pp.74-87
• /
• 1995

지난 8월 세종연구소에서 열린 제4회 국제 해양력 심포지엄에서 발표된 내용을 각 주제별로 요약 정리했다. 21세기 태평양 시대를 대비해 바다를 지키는 해군의 역할이 증대됨에 따라 해군력을 길러야 안보와 함께 국가발전에 기여할 수 있음이 심도 깊게 논의되었다.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.1 s.275
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 2002

한국의 해군력 건설 방향은 미래 해양 안보환경과 국가경제력에 상응함은 물론 주변국 해군에 대해 균형자적 역할을 담당할 수 있는 정예 해군력으로 건설해야 할 것이다. 이런 의미에서 수상 전투함은 높은 안정성, 고감도 탐지 장비와 함정 전투체계에 의한 성분작전 수행 능력 및 전역 탄도미사일 방어를 위한 탐지, 추적, 요격 및 실시간 지휘통제를 위한 함정 전투체계의 능력완비 등을 목표로 개발해 나가야 할 것이다.

• Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology
• /
• v.34 no.1
• /
• pp.116-124
• /
• 2010

The future warfare is changing to the NCW(Network Centric Warfare) from the platform-based warfare. Korea navy has been developing the KNCCS (Korea Naval Command and Control System) and the KNTDS (Korea Naval Tactical Data System) to prepare the NCW. Also, Korea navy has been using the ICS (Integraed Communication System) to transfer the command, control and tactical information on the naval ship. There is a lack of a systematic research and a reference material, although the ICS is a very important network on the naval ship. This paper is described the naval ICS. Also, a direction of the next Korea naval ICS is proposed.

• ICROS
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.36-46
• /
• 2011

자율무인잠수정(Autonomous Underwater Vehicle, AUV)은 미국을 중심으로 1980년대부터 다양한 수중관련 기술의 발전과, 민군의 사용분야가 증가되면서 급속한 발전의 진전을 보았다. 특히, 과학기술의 발전과 군의 전투개념 변화로 요구되는 무기체계도 급속히 변화되면서 자율무인잠수정이 핵심무기체계로 부상하게 되었다. 군에서 효율적인 전장 관리와 사회의 인명 중시 경향은 무기체계를 유인시스템으로 전환시키고 있다. 자율무인잠수정은 심해저 자원탐사, 해양조사 등 민수분야뿐만 아니라 해군의 정보전, 기뢰전, 그리고 대잠전과 같은 성분 작전에서 핵심적 역할을 수행하게 되었다. 본 기고에서 1994년부터 자율무인잠수정 종합발전 계획을 수립하여 개발하고 있는 미 해군 운용개념을 분석하고 분석된 결과를 기초로 하여 미래 우리 해군에서 자율무인잠수정의 개발 및 운용을 위하여 필요한 핵심 기술을 자율제어, 센서 및 신호처리, 진수 및 hgl수. 수중항법, 수중통신, 그리고 에너지 등으로 구분하고 각각에 대하여 기술발전 동향을 고찰하고 기술개발을 제안하였다.

• Strategy21
• /
• s.46
• /
• pp.5-28
• /
• 2020

In 2019, the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of State issued two reports to announce their plan to fulfill "free and open Indo-Pacific". Two reports commonly insisted on the support and participation from allies and partners to maintain security and stability in the Indo-Pacific. In response to this, neighboring states in the Indo-Pacific, including Japan, Australia, India, ASEAN, and Taiwan have different perspectives and stances based on their national interests. South Korea, too, has not clearly announced its position because they need to consider the alliance between the U.S. and South Korea as well as relationships between South Korea and China. This report focuses on the stances of neighboring states to the Indo-Pacific strategy and expected pros and cons of the participation of the strategy. In addition, when considering the name of strategy, the Indo-Pacific, naval power will be a main instrument to implement the strategy. Thus, this study also investigates the role of naval power in the Indo-Pacific strategy.

• Strategy21
• /
• s.46
• /
• pp.159-204
• /
• 2020

This study is written to bring the proposal forward for the direction of south korean naval force. The political situation and the circumstance of the world, especially in the area of Pacific Ocean, are changing very rapidly. North Korea has been always the conventional existing intimidator for South Korea since the 6·25-War. Additionally, the strengthening movements of the national defense, which is easily noticed from China and Russia, is also an other part of intimidating countries against South Korea. Those three mentioned countries are continually developing the asymmetrical warfare systems, for example a strategic nuclear weapon. Since the Obama Administration, the Asia-Pacific Rebalancing-Strategy has been changed as an East Asian foreign policy. Nowadays, Trump Administration renamed the 'United States Pacific-Command' to 'United States Indo-Pacific Command'. The purpose of this is not only letting India to participate in american alliance, but also reducing an economic burden, which is often mentioned in USA. West Germany was located in the very similar geopolitical position during the Cold War just like South Korea these days. And that's why the strategy of West German Navy is worthy of notice for south korean naval force to decide its suitable strategy. Most of all, the two most important things to refer to this study are the plan to expand naval air force and the realistic political stand for us to take it. In conclusion, I laid an emphasis on maintenance of 'green-water-navy'. instead of selecting the strategy as a 'blue-water-navy'. The reason I would like to say, is that south korean navy is not available to hold the unnecessary war potential, just like Aircraft-Carrier. However, this is not meaning to let the expansion of naval force carelessly. We must search the best solution in order to maintain the firm peace within the situation. To fulfill this concept, it is mostly very important to maintain the stream of laying down a keel of destroyers, submarines and air-defense-missile, as well as the hight-tech software system, taking a survey of 4th industrial revolution. Research and development for the best solution of future aircraft by south korean navy is likewise necessary. Besides, we must also set the international diplomatic flexibly. As well as maintaining the relationship with US Forces, it is also very important to improve the relationship with other potential allied nation.

• Maritime Security
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.311-343
• /
• 2020

Because of the global warming, the Arctic Ocean is expected to be ice-free by the year 2035. When the Arctic Ocean will be opened, a number of national interests will become more salient as experiencing a shortened sailing distance and decreasing navigation expense, possibility of natural resources transport by sea from Arctic Circle, and indirect-profit making by building a herb port in Asia. To secure the national interests and support the free activities of people in this region, R.O.K government is trying to make advanced policies. In order to carry out the naval tasks in the Arctic Ocean, using the operational characteristics(mobility, flexibility, sustainability, presence of capabilities, projection) is necessary. To this end, ROK Navy should analyze the operational environment (O.E.) by its capability(weakness and strength), opportunity, and threat. R.O.K. Navy should make an effort over the following issues to implement the tasks in the Arctic Ocean: first, Navy needs to map out her own plan (Roadmap) under the direction of government policies and makes crews participate in the education·training programs in home and abroad for future polar experts. Third, to develop the forces and materials for the tasks in cold, far operations area, Navy should use domestic well-experienced shipbuilding skills and techniques of the fourth industrial revolution. Next, improving the combined operations capabilities and military trust with other countries in the Arctic region to cover the large area with lack of forces' number and to resolve the ports of call issues. Lastly, preparation in advance to execute a variety of missions against military and non-traditional threats such as epidemics, HA/DR, SOLAS, in the future operation area is required.