• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2023.05a
• /
• pp.68-70
• /
• 2023

COVI-19 이후 콜드체인 시스템의 중요성이 증가함과 함께 냉동물류센터에 대한 중요성도 부각되고 있다. 향후 냉동물류센터의 양적·질적 팽창은 불가피하며 그에 따른 위치선정의 중요성도 커지고 있다. 하지만, 대다수의 국내 냉동물류센터는 단순보관의 역할 위주에, 도심이나 주요도로와 멀리 떨어져 있고, 노후화의 문제를 가지고 있다. 또한 냉동물류센터는 에너지 소비가 많은 만큼 위치선정에 따른 비용문제도 큰 영향을 미친다. 따라서 본 연구는 AHP를 활용하여 부산 경남 냉동 물류 센터의 위치 경쟁력 결정 요인을 분석하고자 한다. 시설요인, 서비스 요인, 위치 요인, 그리고 비용 요인의 네 가지 영역과 이를 세부적으로 나누어 19개의 항목을 계층화하여 상대적 중요도를 평가하였다. 연구결과는 냉동물류센터의 입지결정요인과 기존에 냉동물류센터에 요구되던 기본적인 요소에 입지경쟁력 분석을 위한 우선 순위를 계층화하였다. 비용요인이 국내 냉동물류센터 입지경쟁력의 결정요인 중 가장 높은 비중을 차지하였다. 실제 시설인프라와 물류연결성은 관련 업종 근무자들이 가장 민감하게 받아들이는 사항이기도 하며 새로운 냉동물류센터의 도입 시에도 필수적으로 참고가 되어야할 것으로 보인다. 본 연구는 냉동물류센터 종사자 및 관련업계 종사자들이 어떠한 요인을 냉동물류센터의 입지경쟁력 결정요인으로 비중 있게 고려하고 있는지를 도출하였고, 향후 입지경쟁력 향상을 위한 전략적 시사점을 제공한다.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.28 no.4
• /
• pp.209-229
• /
• 2012

There have been lots of studies on locational factors of companies, but, very few studies for Korean shipping companies. This study analyzes locational factors for Korean shipping companies using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. For the study model, the first level is consisted by software, hardware and city policy factors. As more specific factors, the second level is formed by three factors of the first level. The third level consists of Seoul and Busan to evaluate competitive advantage for location of shipping companies. We carried out an analytical survey focused on the executives of shipping companies and related experts, and derived the priority order for locational factors of Korean shipping companies as follow. Firstly, software factors turned out the most important factor for location of Korean shipping companies. Next, Busan has a competitive advantage only in city policy factors. However, there are much of competitive disadvantages in both software and hardware factors for location of shipping companies compared against Seoul.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.53-77
• /
• 2007

This paper is designed to look for a specialized strategies by drawing the special features of Busan New Port from both a comparative analysis of major factors of harbor competitiveness and a SWOT analysis of Busan New Port and Yangshan Port, one of the biggest competitive ports in Northeast Asia, so that Busan New Port may preoccupy a status as the hub port of the area. The researcher would like to suggest the following measures to make Busan New Port serve as the central port of Northeast Asia on the basis of the findings; Korea should push ahead with creating a railroad transportation linking with Eurasia Contient, secure the amount of goods and resources with the help of the early development of the surrounding complex of the port, make a considerable progress in the level of port service, come up with a differentiation strategies for harbor marketing activities and improve its productivity.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2018.05a
• /
• pp.131-132
• /
• 2018

해양산업은 새로운 부가가치산업 및 신성장동력 산업으로 인식되고 있다. 특히 항만을 중심으로 클러스터를 조성하여 고부가가치를 창출하고 있다. 해외 선진항만들도 앞 다투어 클러스터를 조성하여 수익창출과 경쟁력 강화에 나서고 있다. 우리나라도 2015년 해양산업클러스터 조성과 육성에 관한 법률을 제정하였다. 따라서 각 지역별로 어떤 해양산업이 비교우위에 있는지 파악하는 것은 해양산업클러스터를 통한 집적화 전략을 수립하는데 매우 중요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 남지역을 대상으로 해양산업 구조를 분석하였다. 먼저 해양산업 분류에 대한 기존 문헌분석을 실시하여 해운 물류업, 조선업, 수산업, 해양관광업, 기타업 5개의 대분류와 21개 중분류, 84개 소분류로 해양산업을 재분류하였다. 재분류한 해양산업을 기준으로 입지계수와 변이할당분석 기법을 활용하여 전남의 해양산업 구조를 분석하였다. 이 연구결과는 향후 전남지역 해양산업클러스터 구축 시 전략수립에 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.31 no.1
• /
• pp.127-145
• /
• 2015

Plant location selection is a decision which requires huge investment and entails a significant impact in a longer-term. The petrochemical industry, in particular, is so capital- and technology-intensive that the firms in the industry pursue enhancing competitiveness through collaboration and integration among entities in their supply chains. Even though the logistics factor such as logistics costs and connectivity have, as a result, gained its importance in plant location decision making, this has rarely studies in empirical studies. Therefore, this study aims to examine the relative importance of the logistics factor in plant location decision making in the petrochemical industry using the multi-criteria decision-making approach. In addition the three representative petrochemical industrial complexes are evaluated by the factors used in this study. This study is able to provide the useful implication in both practical and policy-making aspects. Firms are required to consider the logistics factors with priority compared to other factors in plant location decision making. In addition, when federal or local governments build industrial sites and attract the petrochemical firm, logistics infrastructure should also be considered to provide better transportation connectivity and lower logistics costs in turn.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2006.06b
• /
• pp.411-415
• /
• 2006

The Circumstances surrounding world ports have changed rapidly and port competition to attract more a client to each other. then, In the future, only a few ports will be survive. Therefore, industrail that concern with ports is very important position. if it revitalize, port must have international competitiveness. The purpose of this paper is as follow. The first is to investigate ship-instrument industrial with theoretical background and distribution cycle. And then, to determine the location' ship-instrument distribution center' in the Busan Port. The second is to analyze to proposal location for distribution center.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.234-258
• /
• 2010

This research attempts to explore the competitive advantage of the Busan New Port based on the comparative analysis against the major ports. The competitive environment of the global shipping business poses a variety of challenges for the port authorities. Pursuing the hub position in the Northeast Asia, Busan new port needs an in-depth competitive analysis against the major ports in Singapore and China. This research proposes the strategies to exploit the locational advantage of the port while upgrading the operational efficiency. The recent development of the information technology suggests a viable solution for the Busan port.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2011.06a
• /
• pp.373-375
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 일본의 워터프런트 니시노미야하마의 거주자를 대상으로 앙케이트 조사를 실시하여 속성, 주거 내외 총합평가, 친수 활동 등에 대해 비교 분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 향후의 워터 프런트에 입지하는 집합주택 거주자들의 거주환경에 대한 상이점을 알 수 있었다.또 워터프런트지역에서 "방의 넓이" "통풍" "전망 채광" "프라이버시의 확보"등 워터프런트에 입지하는 집합주택의 계획수립 시에 상기한 거주환경의 조성이 거주자들의 주거의식에 영향을 미치고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2020.11a
• /
• pp.28-30
• /
• 2020

우리나라 해역은 크게 동해, 서해와 남해로 나뉜다. 해역별 특성은 공간적 및 유체역학적으로 상이하여 해역별 수중거주시설의 설계에 있어 서로 다른 주요건과 시설구성을 필요로 한다. 본 연구는 거시적 수중주거시설 설계기술 연구의 일환으로서 특히 해역별 공간 특성을 잘 갖춘 3곳의 입지 후보지(동해:Phoenix point, 남해:South Brother point와 서해:Mud point)에 대하여 요구되는 해역별 설계 환경부하를 최근 태풍Haishen, 태풍Maysak과 태풍 Bavi의 기상 예측자료 및 관측자료를 통해 비교하고 가정한 건축목표(Phoenix point: 속초시에 탈탄소 전력공급, South Brother point:부산항 수소연료 비축기지 및 해상 수소충전소, Mud point:에너지 자립형 기후중립 수산양식 기지)에 부합하도록 시설구성을 제안함으로써 우리나라 연안의 천해와 심해에서의 수중거주 가능성을 조사했다.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.85-101
• /
• 2015

This study formulates a development strategy for Gwangyang port through the analysis of its competition with other major Northeast Asian ports. A revised BCG matrix is applied to estimate the change in competition between the major ports in Northeast Asia and the Lotka-Volterra model is used for the competitor analysis. The growing competitive power and influence of Chinese ports, continued competitive advantage of Busan port, diminishing competitiveness of Gwangyang and Incheon ports, and disappearing competitive position of Japanese ports in Northeast Asia are all confirmed. In addition, according to the relationship between Gwangyang port and other major Northeast Asian ports from 2007 to 2014, Gwangyang port has changed to a predatory from a win/win relation with Busan port and has maintained its predatory relationship with Hong Kong port in terms of transshipment cargoes. Moreover, Gwangyang port has formed predatory relationships with Shanghai and Ningbo ports, a pure competitive relation with Tianjin port, and a win/win relation with Qingdao and Dalian ports. Overall, predatory relationships between Gwangyang port and other Northeast Asia ports increased from 2007 to 2014. The counterstrategies for Gwangyang port to address this situation include establishing cooperative relations and continuing the win/win relationships with cooperative ports.