• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.155-162
• /
• 2002

한국목록규칙 제4판 초안의 (지도자료)를 위한 목록 규칙을 분석하고 그 내용을 AACR2R(1998), NCR, 그리고 ISBD에서의 해당 목록 규칙들과 비교·분석한 뒤, 더욱 효율적인 지도자료 조직을 위한 한국목록규칙 제4판 초안의 수정안들을 제시하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.147-154
• /
• 2002

본고에서는 한국목록규칙 제4판 초안에 있어서, 제8장 "정지화상자료"의 목록규칙을 분석하고자 한다. 이를 위해, International Standard Bibliographic Description for Non-Book Materials(1987), Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed. (1998), 그리고 일본목록규칙(1994)을 중심으로 비교하였다. 이에, 다양한 형태를 띄고 있는 정지화상자료에 있어서, KCR 4판의 "정지화상자료" 목록규칙이 목록규칙 사용자나 자료를 찾는 이용자로 하여금 편리하게 이용할 수 있도록 서지사항을 일관성있게 규정되어 있는지에 관하여 분석해 보고자 한다. 그리하여 초안을 더 수정·보완하여, KCR 4판을 발행하는데 있어서 조금이나마 도움이 되고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.141-146
• /
• 2002

KCR4판 초안의 제5장 '악보'부분에 대한 각 조문을 일본목록규칙(NCR, 1996), 영미목록규칙(AACR2R, 1998), ISBD(PM, 1991)와 비교해 그 차이점과 논란이 될 수 있는 부분에 대한 분석을 시도해 보았다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.149-166
• /
• 2004

This study make comparative analysis of the cataloging rules on the edition area included in the KCR4, NCR(2001), AACR2R, ISBD(M), and ISBD(ER). There is a delicate difference between the cataloging rules. The main features on the edition are as the follows. (1) In the bibliography description the concept of the edition is a general application. That is to say, the edition construct the new edition and the impression. The former comes the purview of a change content, the size, and a printing type. The latter publish newly- (2) The requisite for description of the edition area consists of a edition statement, statements of responsibility relating to the edition, additional edition statement, and statements of responsibility following an additional edition statement. Voluntary rules transcribe the parallel edition statement. (3) In the case of the electronic materials special versions on content and Auction indicates as the edition, but the environment of software does not indicate as it. (4) Parallel statement of responsibility relating to the edition, parallel additional edition statements, and parallel statements of responsibility following an additional edition statement are voluntary rules or not transcribed in the edition area.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.47 no.3
• /
• pp.275-293
• /
• 2013

This study conducted comparative analysis of cataloging descriptions and rules in KCR 4 and CCR 2, as follows, for the purpose of seeking understanding of classical materials cataloging rules and networking of oriental historical data cataloging (bibliographical descriptions). First, to compare the general rules, the objects of descriptions and composition of descriptions, recording order, and punctuation and information source of descriptions were analyzed. As a result, KCR 4 is more detailed in terms of author role identifications and information source regulations and CCR2 is more detailed in terms of regulations related to printing and publications and serial publications. Second, to compare the details, the main titles and liability indications, edition details, publication details and format details, and note details. As a result, regarding the description of edition type and publication details, KCR4 has detailed regulations and CCR2 has characteristic summary in terms of note details.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.40 no.1
• /
• pp.181-207
• /
• 2009

The Korean Library Association has developed the Korean Cataloging Rules, fourth edition(KCR4) in 2003 and the National Library of Korea developed integrated version of KORMARC formats in 2006 on the basis of KCR4. Many educational institutions and libraries are currently cataloging based on KORMARC. Nevertheless, we have encountered many problems on KCR4 and KORMARC formats which needed to be modified. This study is aimed at pointing out the problems of KCR4 in describing 245 field which has a crucial and important role. Therefore, this study proposes the improvement methods of the use of parenthesis and subfield code in 245 field, and presents a description format of volume number, statement of responsibility and joint works including more than four persons.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.235-256
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to suggest a reform after detecting out issues and problems associated with the KCR 4th ed.(draft). KCR(Korean Cataloguing Rules) is representative cataloguing rules in Korea, the 4th ed.(draft) of which was prepared by Cataloguing Committee(department of KLA) in 2001. As a result of this study, a lot of problem which are glossary, context, inconsistency of the contents, rules applied to card catalog, and others, were found out. Thus, substantial improvements were able to be suggested.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.169-174
• /
• 2002

한국목록규칙 제4판 초안의 제1부 기술 중 제1장 기술총칙에 대한 각 조문을 AACR2R(1998), NCR(1996), ISBD(G)(1992)와 비교하여 보완과 수정이 되는 부분을 제시하고자 하였다.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.34 no.3
• /
• pp.1-19
• /
• 2003

Due to rapid internet supply, the increase of electronic resources including network resources, and the appearance of metadate, there has been a sudden change in cataloguing fields. To deal with rapid changes, the related organizations such as IFLA are organizing the research team and revising rules. This study analyzes current trend of cataloguing digital resources, considering recent matters in regards with the revision of ISBD(ER), AACR2R 2002 edition, MARC 21, Dubin Core, KCR4 etc. This research discusses also the questions of how digital resources are organized; automatic indexing, matadata, and MARC format.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.5-23
• /
• 2014

The bibliographic records have been built up following the Digital Library System (DLS) cataloging rules in the school libraries. But it is hard to use DLS cataloging rule as the standardization guidelines in building up the bibliographic records in school libraries because it is not the detailed cataloging rules, has inconsistency in its own rules, and disagrees with KCR4 rules. Therefore, this study is to suggest the new amendment for DLS cataloging rule to improve the bibliographic records quality and to produce the standardized bibliographic records. To grasp the problems of the DLS cataloging rules, DLS cataloging rule was analyzed with KCR4 rule and the interviews were conducted to the 9 school librarian that have experienced over 3 years. The result showed that it was needed to correct the terms to accord with KCR4, and to amend the DLS rule in each area.