• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.31 no.8
• /
• pp.1110-1120
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers' perceptions of gender differences in students' mathematics and science learning ability. The sample included 289 elementary and secondary school gifted teachers. The teachers filled out the survey, asking their perceptions of gender differences in mathematics and science learning ability, as well as of the reasons of the differences. The results were as follows: 1) 65% of the teachers responded that gender differences existed in students' mathematics and science learning ability, 2) 63% of the teachers perceived that the differences began around higher elementary or middle school ages, 3) 57% of the teachers thought that gender differences existed in the high-achieving student group. Teachers perceived the reasons of differences were 1) differences in inborn ability, 2) the different expectation, and 3) the different ways of parental cares. Since teachers' perceptions of students' ability would impact teachers' attitudes on students, implications and suggestions were included in this article to provide teachers insights that promote students' better learning.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.31 no.4
• /
• pp.600-608
• /
• 2011

The ultimate goal of instruction is for learners to understand contents they have to learn in class. Therefore, shedding light is needed on the characteristics of understanding required by teachers and perceived by students when class is conducted for the purpose of understanding. To do this, 87 middle school teachers were requested to write down questions they asked to improve the understanding of learners in 'reproduction and genesis' unit. They were categorized according to Wiggins & McTighe's six aspects of understanding and a questionnaire was developed based on the data. A survey was conducted on 90 teachers and 370 ninth-grade students. The findings of this study were as follows: First, the teachers demanded explaining, interpreting and perspective a lot, but applying, empathy and self-knowledge were scarcely required. Second, the teachers demanded explaining the most, and the students as well. The next aspect of understanding in both groups was interpreting, followed by perspective, applying, empathy and self-knowledge. There were significant differences among the opinions of the students according to gender (p<0.05). Third, the students persevered explaining, applying and self-knowledge the same way as the teachers demanded, but not for interpreting, perspective and empathy. This study is expected to provide some information to achieve the instruction objectives of understanding successfully.

• The Journal of Korean Society for School & Community Health Education
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.29-41
• /
• 2011

배경 및 목적 : 미국과한국양국의대학생의음주문제는심각한사회문제이며, 대학생의음주문제를예방하기 위한 다양한 노력들이 시도되고 있다. 본 연구는 미국과 한국대학생들의 음주와 폭음에 대한 인식 및 태도에 차이가 있는지를 비교 분석하기 위해 설계되었다. 방법 : 데이터는 2001년 미국의 하버드 보건대학원의 College Alcohol Study (CAS) 팀에서 미국의 120개 4년제 대학에서 10,904명에게서 조사한 원자료와 한국에서는2003년 삼육대학교 보건복지대학원의 Korean College Alcohol Study (KCAS) 팀에서 전국의 60개 4년제 대학의 2,385명의 원자료를 함께 통합하여 사용하였다. 이 자료의 특징은CAS에서 개발한설문지를 한국과 미 국양측에서 공동으로 사용하여 양 국가를 대표한 4년제 대학생의 표본을 대상으로 음주와 관련된 조사를 수행한 점이다. 결과 : 한국남학생들이 폭음할 기회가7.74배더많고 여학생의 경우는3.36배 더많다. 지난 한달동안 3회 이상 술 취한 경험율에서 한국 남학생들의 경험율이 34.3%로 미국의 20.4%보다 많고, 여학생의 경우도 24.6%로 미국 여학생의 11.1%보다 현저히 더 많다. 한국 대학생들의 폭음자 비율이 미국 대학생들의 폭음자 비율보다 많은 것과같이, 한국 대학생들이 미국의 대학생들 보다 폭음이 안전한 것으로 인식하고 있으며, 음주에있어서도더욱허용적인태도를가지고있다. 한국남학생의78.4%와 여학생의67.3%가 폭음 이상의 량을 안전하다고 인식하고 있다(미국은 남학생은 50.3%, 여학생은 34.1%). 폭음에 해당하는 음주량(남자는5잔 이상, 여자는4잔 이상)을안전하다고인식하는정도에서한국의대학생들이미국의대학생들에 비해서 남학생은 4.06배, 여학생이 3,96배 더 높다. 결론 : 한국 학생들 중에서도 음주의 량이 더 많은 학생들이 다른 학생들보다 음주와 술 취함과 폭음에 관하여 더욱 허용적이고, 안전한 음주에 대해 더욱 둔감한 태도와 신념을 보이고 있다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.32 no.4
• /
• pp.586-603
• /
• 2012

This study is a survey conducted to explore what art high school students specifically see as nature of science. Third-year students of a high school of arts in Gyeonggi-do participated in the survey. The questionnaire was classified into three categories - the formative arts in the fine arts, the sound arts in music, the performing arts in dance, and drama and play. The study analyzed what they think of as similar aspects of science and art respectively according to their majors, with focus on the extracts. As a result, they mentioned 'creative imagination', 'correlation with technology', 'social and cultural relation', 'subjectivity', 'variability', and 'inquiring attitude' as similarities between science and art. The results are almost the same as the elements of the nature of science as agreed on by scientists. From the result, we can assume that students majoring in art, indeed, need an education on the nature of science. Also, while the fine arts students have more tendency to perceive inquiring attitude than others, music students are more likely to perceive variability than others. Therefore, teaching strategy in experimental inquiring context for the former is more helpful in understanding the nature of science, and teaching strategy in the context of scientific history for the latter.

• Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.393-402
• /
• 2020

The purpose is to provide the basic information about the changes of the social distance, disability awareness, and activity satisfaction of the occupational therapy students through the parachute play. The subjects were 10 students in the third grade of the occupational therapy. They participated in the parachute play for 4 weeks. Their social distance, disability awareness and activity satisfaction were evaluated. The results showed the changes that the social distance was decreased, disability awareness and the activity satisfaction was increased after the play. Thus, to form the positive social distance and disability awareness and increase the activity satisfaction, the parachute play should be provided for the occupational therapy students.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.151-158
• /
• 2014

This study was designed to analyze fifty-seven high school students' perception of environmental change through drawing. More than half of the students showed the present environment as a pure natural space, and they represented the future environment as a space which includes the artificial contents, they also expressed technology advance in their picture. Most of high school students showed the negative perception to express the present environmental condition in a polluted space by human. In matters of the future environmental condition, half of students expressed it positively, the other half of students expressed it negatively, we should develop our will to improve the environment, and try to change student's preception positively.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.39 no.1
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2019

This study aims to explore students' epistemic practices and considerations, which are explained as underlying epistemic thoughts that guide their epistemic practices, during argumentation in science classrooms. We also investigated how collaborative reflection facilitated the development of such epistemic considerations. Two seventh-grade classes participated in this study by engaging in argumentation activities and collaborative reflection after classes. A group with students' change in epistemic aspects and the influence of collaborative reflection clearly revealed from their practices was chosen as a focus group. We recorded their class discussions and collaborative reflections with the researchers. Transcriptions of the recordings and checklists we collected during the collaborative reflections were used for analysis. Results showed evident changes in the students' epistemic considerations and practices and four factors facilitating such developments were identified. First, the researcher facilitating the students to recognize each other as collaborators during collaborative reflection led development of epistemic considerations on "audience using the knowledge products." Second, the collaborative reflection facilitated construction of context for peer interactions where the students encouraged each other to participate in the discussion, resulting in the development of other students' epistemic considerations on "justifications in knowledge products." Third, the items provided on the checklists explicitly delineated expectations on their practices in argumentation, also facilitating development of epistemic considerations. Lastly, the students' imitation of the researcher's pattern of discourse facilitated construction of causal explanation and development of epistemic considerations on "nature of the knowledge products." This study will contribute to the construction of strategies that develop students' epistemic considerations and productive epistemic practices in argumentation.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.65 no.1
• /
• pp.37-47
• /
• 2021

In this study, the model cognition level of high school science-gifted students about the two types of acid-base models taught in secondary schools was analyzed. In order to find out the model cognition level of students, 12 items were developed based on the acid-base reaction and the dissociation reaction of acids and bases. The subjects of the study were 95 students of two science-gifted schools. As a result of the questionnaire analysis, model cognition levels were analyzed 6 levels in the context of consistency, inconsistency, and unexplainable scope of the two models. In the acid-base reaction item, the largest percentage of students cognized only understanding of the two models. In the acid-base dissociation reaction item, they understood the two models and perceived the 'Known Ignorance' that cognizes the limitations of one model. However, there was only one student who perceived the limitations of both models and all of the 'Unknown Ignorance' that the model could not explain. Through this, we argued that there is a need for educational efforts to raise the model cognition level of science-gifted students.

• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• v.7 no.5
• /
• pp.59-65
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to research the perception on patient private information protection of 126 nursing students before clinical practice. The mean score of perception on patient private information protection was 4.52 points of full 5. The perception of protecting patient privacy was no significantly differentiated with general characteristics of nursing students. Development and application of patient private information education program for inexperienced nursing students is necessary. Also it is necessary to seek joint plans between medical institutions and universities to improve the awareness of patient privacy.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.34 no.6
• /
• pp.571-581
• /
• 2014

This study aims to investigate how high school teachers and students perceive the purpose of science learning. Participants were high school science teachers and students from one hundred and sixty high schools nationwide, which were selected through proportional stratified sampling method. Teachers and students responded on open-ended questionnaires about the purpose of science learning. The data were analyzed using the semantic network analysis method. Our study illustrates three major finding: First, teachers recognized the intrinsic value related to cognitive domain as the more important purpose of science learning, while students recognized the extrinsic value related to personal usefulness domain as more important. Second, teachers' responses were significantly different depending on the teaching career. Beginning teachers believed both intrinsic and extrinsic values were equally important, while experienced teachers believed the cognitive domain about understanding of scientific knowledge was more important than intrinsic values. In other words, the differences in perception of the purpose of science between teachers and students, the experienced teachers is greater than the beginning teachers. Finally, students' responses were different depending on their academic track. Humanity major students recognized that learning science made their everyday-life easier while science major students recognized that learning science should be related to their future careers. In conclusion, the results of this study is expected to be of use as the basic data to identify the characteristic of teachers and students related to science.