• 건강소식
• /
• v.29 no.6 s.319
• /
• pp.34-35
• /
• 2005

지명을 대면 곧바로 그 지역의 가장 유명한 음식이 생각나는 곳들이 있다. 전주의 비빔밤이 그렇고, 안동의 간고등어가 그렇다. 고창하면 누구나 풍천장어를 떠올린다. 장어에 곁들인 복분자주까지 생각나 순간적으로 입 안에 침이 고일 정도다. 어디 맛있는 음식이 있다 하면 금방 흉내 내는 요즘 세상에 풍천장어도 고창이 아닌 전국 곳곳에 간판을 내달고 있다. 하지만 고창에서 먹는 그 맛이 아니다. 맛있는 먹거리란 음식 그 자체만이 아니라 그 지역의 기운까지 함께 먹는 것이기 때문이리라.

• Journal of the Korean Society of School Health
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.17-20
• /
• 1990

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.121
• /
• pp.12-17
• /
• 2011

선운사 동백꽃이 흐드러지게 피던날 복분자와 풍천 장어 그리고 황토 수박으로 유명한 전라북도의 서남쪽 이름난 조경수 집단재배 지역인 고창군에서 우량 명품 조경수만을 생산하는 유승환 사장의 송강조경농장을 찾았다.

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.37
• /
• pp.127-159
• /
• 2009

This paper is about the conception of "Hwangjoin(皇朝人)" during the reign of King Youngjo in the Joseon Dynasity. Originally, Hwangjoin meant the Chinese people till the mid-term of the Joseon Dynasty but the meaning was changed to the immigrants from the Ming(明) dynasty in reign of King Youngjo. They were Han Chinese(漢族) and moved to the Joseon between the Japanese Invasion in 1592 and the Manchu war in 1636. The Joseon government gave a warm welcome to them. Two wars made the Joseon government pay attention to the national restoration and served the entrance of 'Sallim(山林)' on the central government as a momentum. Song, Siyeol(宋時烈) was the leader of Sallim, who made an issue of 'Daecheong-boksu Discourse(對淸復讐論;to revenge on Ching(淸) Dynasty)' like a way of 'Bukbeol(北伐;to attack Ching Dynasty)'. His plan came to fail because of the death of King Hyojong and was replaced with Jonju Discourse(尊周論;respect for Zhou Dynasty). Daebodan(大報壇) was built in the reign of King Sukjong, which meant Joseon got the justness that they inherited from the Ming Dynasty. Later Daebodan expanded and it led to works in honor of loyal subjects and patriots, victims of two wars and a policy of a warm reception for Hwangjoin. King Youngjo did his best to theorize Daemyeong Euiri Discourse(對明義理論) and Jonju Discourse for himself. His efforts came out as a spread of conception on Pungcheon(風泉;fengquan), publication and education of Eoje-seo (御製書) and making literary works(英祖御製). King Youngjo employed many policies for Hwangjoin. First, operation of Chungnyanggwa(忠良科) opened a door for them to go into politics. Second, descendants of Hwangjoin had charge of Hwangdan's guard(皇壇 守直) posts. and joined in the sacrificial rites of Ming Emperors. Third, they could have government jobs and honorary posts for ancestors' merits. Fourth, a list of Hwangjoin, "Hwainlok(華人錄)" was published and they got preferential treatment unlike Hyanhwain(向化人). King Young's Pungcheon(風泉) had an effect on literature such as Lee, Gyusang(李奎象)'s "Beong-sejaeunlok(幷世才彦錄)" and Song, Gyubin(宋奎斌)'s Pungcheon-yuhyang(風泉遺響)". The general people of Joseon were jealous and envious of them because of special treatment polices for Hwangjoin. So people wanted to be included in Hwangjoin as far as possible and there were cases of pretending to be a Hwangjoin. The conception of "Hwangjoin(皇朝人)" during the reign of King Youngjo was realized as the policy for Hwangjoin based on Daemyeong Euiri Discourse (對明義理論) and Jonju Discourse(尊周論). It was a way of becoming clear about Joseon's position in political principle.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.52 no.2
• /
• pp.62-79
• /
• 2019

This study examined the background of Gyeongju Seochulji Pond (world heritage, historic site No. 138), a historic pond in Sam-guk-yu-sa (三國遺事), and its landscaping period when it served as the garden of the Pungcheon Lim clan (豊川 任氏) in the middle of the Joseon dynasty. For this study, a literature review of poetry, prose, and a personal anthology, and a field survey were conducted. Changes in the landscape were analyzed by comparing the landscape appearing in the literature of the Joseon period with past photographs. The results were as follows: First, even though the function and landscape at that time cannot be guessed as the objective ground from Silla to the early part of the Joseon dynasty is insufficient, it has been managed as a Byeolseo (別墅) garden as Pungcheon Lim's family resided in the area of Eastern-Namsan Mountain during the Joseon dynasty. At that time, Seochulji Pond was recognized as a historic place. It functioned as the garden of Pungcheon Lim's family as Lim Jeok (任勣, 1612~1672) built the Yiyodang pavilion (二樂堂). Second, in the literature, the Yiyodang pavilion has been called Gaekdang (客堂), Jeongsa (精舍), Byeolgak (別閣) and Byeolseo, etc. It can be seen as Nu and Jeong (樓亭), utilized for various uses. Because of this, the name Bingheoru Pavilion (憑虛樓) has mostly been in common use. Third, Seochulji Pond was positioned where the scenery is beautiful, with Gyeongju Mt. Namsan (Mt. Geumo) in the background and with a wide field and the Namcheon River flowing in the front. This was typical of Byeolseo gardens of the Joseon dynasty, combining human environments with natural environments. Fourth, the relationship with the Byeolseo garden disappeared as the head of Pungcheon Lim's family added a temple, lotus flowers, pine trees, and a bamboo forest as described in the old poetry and prose. Currently, the landscape does not appear to be significantly different from that as development has not occurred in the area of Seochulji Pond. Also, crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica), which now symbolizes the Seochulji Pond, was not identified in the old poetry or past photographs and is not old enough to confirm whether it was prominent at the time. Through this study, it is necessary to reconsider the spatial meanings of the gardens of the Joseon dynasty period and not to highlight the area of Seochulji Pond as a place in the legend. This is a cultural asset in the area of Eastern-Namsan Mountain and has an important meaning in terms of garden history.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.151-151
• /
• 2015

최근 기후변화 및 토지 이용변화 때문에 홍수가 빈번하고 이로 인한 피해가 급증하고 있으며 4대강 사업이 이슈가 되면서 강우예측과 홍수량 산정에 대한 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 하지만 여전히 홍수량 과다 과소 산정으로 인하여 지역적으로 문제점이 야기되고 피해가 발생하고 있다. 특히 Thiessen방법은 유역의 면적 강우량을 산정하기 위해 광범위하게 사용되고 있는데 중 소유역 또는 미계측 유역에 적절한 고려없이 무분별하게 사용하고 있어 문제가 발생되고 있는 실정이다. 또한 현재까지 큰 문제는 발생하지 않았지만 여전히 안전이나 위험에 노출된 상태이다. 따라서 Thiessen망 사용의 정밀한 분석이 무엇보다 필요한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구를 통하여 소유역 및 미계측 유역을 대상으로 Thiessen망 이용시 관측소 선정에 따른 홍수량의 차이를 분석하고, 이에 따라 어떠한 문제가 발생할 수 있는지 분석하였다. 기존 소유역 및 미계측 유역 중 Thiessen방법을 적용하여 홍수량을 산정한 사례를 전반적으로 조사하였다. 이중에서 여러 지점중 Thiessen망 사용으로 유역이 분할되어 홍수량산정에 문제가 될 수 있는 관하천, 수외천, 주교천, 풍천을 연구 대상지점으로 선정하였다. 부적절한 Thiessen망 산정이 홍수량 산정에 미치는 영향을 평가하기 위하여 신뢰성있고 가장 실설계에 많이 사용되고 있는 다음의 방법으로 홍수량을 산정하였다. 먼저, 관측소 선정에 있어서 관측년도가 비교적 길고 유역과 가장 가까운 기상청 관할의 관측소를 선정하고 홍수량 산정요령에 따라 홍수량을 재 산정 하였다. 본 연구로부터 나온 결과에서, 산정된 홍수량은 기존의 Thiessen망을 통하여 산정된 홍수량과 차이를 보였고, 이는 Thiessen다각형 이론에 위배되는 관측소 선정이 원인으로 밝혀졌다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 관측년도가 길고 강우자료의 신뢰도가 높은 기상청 관할 관측소의 강우자료를 우선적으로 사용할 것을 제시하였다. 또한, 여러 관측소의 강우자료를 Thiessen망을 통하여 산정하는 부적절한 산정법을 신뢰성있는 단일지점의 강우량 산정법으로 적절한 홍수량이 산정할 것을 제시하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.38 no.5
• /
• pp.686-700
• /
• 2003

In Korea, aside from their official administrative names, aliases of each province or some regions are widely used not only today but also during the Joseon period when the provincial system as local administrative system was firmly implemented. Of aliases, the most representative were Giho, Gwandong, Hoseo, Haeseo, Honam, Yaeongnam, Gwanseo, and Gwanbuk representing the eight provinces (precisely, Gyeonggi and seven provinces) of Chosun Dynasty, as well as Yeongdong and Yeongseo that represent the east and the west of Gangwon-do. These aliases are mostly based on topographical features and physiographical elements, and compared to the official names of eight provinces which depended solely on city names. Of aliases, some appeared in literature during 13-l4th centuries, and all provincial aliases seem to have been widely used after the late 15th century. Aliases continued to be used for 500 to over 700 years. Aliases of eight provinces, geographically, played not lesser role than their official names. Aliases of the eight provinces and regions during the Chosun Dynasty that have been handed down are considered as holding their places' cultural and historical backgrounds, and have become important enough to be accepted as a unit of geographical regional division. The origin and meaning of aliases of each province have been partially disclosed to the geographical circle and the general public. However, the details should be reviewed. First of all, Gwan in Gwanbuk, Gwanseo and Gwandong, as well as Yeong in Yeongnam, Yeongdong and Yeongseo, are each considered as meaning Sobaek Mountain Range and Taebaek Mountain Range with many borderline areas (borders) and military strategic hubs. Also, Ho in Honam, Hoseo, and Giho, are considered as based on the Geum River and Eurimji, and Haeseo are considered as meaning the west of the Gyeonggi Bay, and having relevancy with the first letters of Haeju and Seoha (Pungcheon).

• Korean Journal of Weed Science
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.325-333
• /
• 1997

Selection of pepper (Capsicum sp.) cultivars tolerant to acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides {imazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3=pyridine-carboxylic acid, and primisulfuron methyl 2-[[[[[4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino] carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoate} was investigated. Pepper cultivars such as Red Top, Happy Dry, Golden Tower, and Hagyeorae showed relatively tolerant response to imazethapyr, while cultivars; Korea, Cheongyang, Oriental Glory, and Hanam were susceptible. Red Horn, Jopoong, Kwangbok, and Wangcho cultivars were tolerant to primisulfuron whereas Korea, Dahhong, Chamjoah, and Poongchon cultivars were susceptible. Determination of growth inhibition by ALS-inhibiting herbicides showed that the $I_{50}$ estimates of growth from the susceptible- and tolerant-cultivars were 0.075 and 0.20kg ai/ha for imazethapyr; 0.06 and 0.16kg ai/ha for primisulfuron, respectively. Furthermore, the $GR_{50}$ estimates of growth from the susceptible and tolerant cultivars were 0.05 and 0.20kg ai/ha for imazethapyr; 0.07 and 0.16kg ai/ha for primisulfuron, respectively. This result, based on the $GR_{50}$ and $I_{50}$ values, indicates that responses of pepper to ALS-inhibiting herbicides between tolerant- and susceptible-cultivars were different about 3- to 4-fold to imazethapyr, and 2- to 3-fold to primisulfuron.