• 제목/요약/키워드: 표준 ${\kappa}-{\epsilon}$ 난류 모델

검색결과 3건 처리시간 0.017초

Horn-type Rudder 주위의 2 차원 난류유동 해석 (Analysis of Two-Dimensional Turbulent Flow around the Horn-type Rudder)

  • 정남균
    • 대한기계학회논문집B
    • /
    • 제33권11호
    • /
    • pp.924-931
    • /
    • 2009
  • The two-dimensional turbulent flow around the horn-type rudder has been examined in the present study by using the commercial code FLUENT. The standard ${\kappa}-{\epsilon}$ model is used as a closure relationship. The geometry of horn rudder is based on the NACA 0020 airfoil. The simulations for various angle attack (${\alpha}$) and yaw angle(${\delta}$) are carried out. The effect of Reynolds number is also investigated in this study. The cavitation is more possible when the yaw angle is $6^{\circ}$ and it is more serious as Reynolds number increases.

도로터널내부 화재시의 열전달 및 연기거동에 따른 피난안전성평가에 관한 수치적 연구 (Numerical Simulation on the Heat Transfer and Smoke Flow Phenomena and Evacuation in the Road funnel Fires)

  • 민동호;손봉세
    • 한국화재소방학회논문지
    • /
    • 제19권1호
    • /
    • pp.87-92
    • /
    • 2005
  • 본 연구에서는 도로터널 화재에 따른 열 전달 및 연기거동의 특성과 피난시뮬레이션에 대하여 수치적 연구를 수행하였다. 화재발생부분의 발열량은 30MW이며, 수치해석에 사용된 난류모델은 표준 $\kappa-\varepsilon$ 모델을 사용하였다. 도로터널에서 열기류 및 연기의 이동경로 형태를 예측하여 방재 및 피난 시스템을 구축하는데, 도로터널 설계 시에 유용한 자료로 이용될 수 있다.

CFD를 이용한 박스형 건물의 풍압분포 분석에 관한 연구 (A Study of Wind Pressure Distribution for a Rectangular Building Using CFD)

  • 신동신;박재현;강보미;김은미;임형준;이진영
    • 설비공학논문집
    • /
    • 제28권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2016
  • This paper studies the wind pressure distribution over the Commonwealth Advisory Aeronautical Council building model (CAARC model) using CFD. We also considered the interaction between the CAARC model and other buildings. The Reynolds number based on the building height was 380,000. The number of sells for the simulation was about 500,000. The wind pressure was lowest when the wind direction was blowing at an angle 45 degrees of the CAARC model. When the gap between the two buildings in front of the CAARC was over 1/2 the horizontal length of the CAARC model, the wind pressure was higher than the pressure without the two buildings. When the distance between the two front buildings and the CAARC was less than 1.5 times the vertical length of the CAARC model, the wind pressure increased. Accordingly, the relative distance between two buildings or the distance from the CAARC model should be considered when extra wind exists due to other buildings.