• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.127-132
• /
• 2002

절단된 정규분포의 평균과 분산을 추정하기 위하여 전체 표본에 기초한 최대가능도 추정량을 사용한 방법과 절단된 후에 남아있는 표본만을 고려한 절단된 표본의 표본평균과 표본분산을 시뮬레이션을 통해 비교 연구하였다. 평균을 추정하는 경우에는 놀랍게도 절단된 자료에 기초한 추정량이 전체 표본에 기초한 추정량보다 평균제곱오차가 더 작다는 것을 발견하였다.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.375-385
• /
• 2014

This study compares the confidence interval estimation of population mean with that of population ratio, and considers whether these two estimations ensures consistency. As a result, this study suggests the following acquisition method of consistency : dealing with population mean and population ratio in the same mode, substituting the observed or experimental value of sample standard deviation for standard deviation in population in setting a confidence interval of both population mean and population ratio, and distinguishing population ratio $\hat{P}$ from its observed vale $\hat{p}$.

• Journal for History of Mathematics
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.15-21
• /
• 1996

적률법(method of moment)이란 변수 X의 멱승에대한 기대치를 이용하여 분포의 성질을 알아보는 방법이다. 여기서 적률법이 이용되어진 역사적 배경을 소개하고, 3차 적률들의 선형적 성질을 비교하였다. 먼저, Kagan이 입증한 표본평균에 관한 3차 표본적률의 선형적 성질과 Bayesian 경우에 3차 사후적률(posterior moment)과 사후평균(posterior)의 선형성을 소개하였다. 그리고, 자연지수족(natural exponential family)아래서도 표본평균에 관한 3차 표본적률의 선형성을 알아보기 위해 단순함수(simple function)의 형태로 유도하였으며, 정규분포인 경우에 적용시켜 보았다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.309-316
• /
• 2006

This study examined the ambiguous using the terminology of statistics at mathematics textbook of highschool in Korea and proposed the correct using of sampling error and sampling distribution of sample mean with consistency. And this paper proposed that the concept of error have to teach in context of sampling action in school mathematics.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.11-14
• /
• 1968

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.301-309
• /
• 2017

It is often possible to test for differences in population means when two or more samples are extracted from each N population. However, it is not possible to test for the mean difference if one sample is extracted from each population since a sample mean does not exist. But, by dividing a group of samples extracted one by one into two groups and generating a sample mean, we can identify a heterogeneity that may exist within the group by comparing the differences of the groups' mean. Therefore, we propose a minimum combination t-test method that can test the mean difference by the number of combinations that can be divided into two groups. In this paper, we proposed a method to test differences between means to check heterogeneity in a group of extracted samples. We verified the performance of the method by simulation study and obtained the results through real data analysis.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.1211-1219
• /
• 2013

Recently, the usage of skew-normal distribution, instead of classical normal distribution, is rising up in many statistical theories and applications. In this paper, we deal with saddlepoint approximation for the distribution function of sample mean of skew-normal distribution. Comparing to normal approximation, saddlepoint approximation provides very accurate results in small sample sizes as well as for large or moderate sample sizes. Saddlepoint approximations related to the skew-normal distribution, suggested in this paper, can be used as a approximate approach to the classical method of Gupta and Chen (2001) and Chen et al. (2004) which need very complicate calculations. Through simulation study, we verified the accuracy of the suggested approximation and applied the approximation to Robert's (1966) twin data.

• Survey Research
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.53-69
• /
• 2006

Weights can be made and imposed in both sample design stage and analysis stage in a sample survey. While in design stage weights are related with sample data acquisition quantities such as sample selection probability and response rate, in analysis stage weights are connected with external quantities, for instance population quantities and some auxiliary information. The final weight is the product of all weights in both stage. In the present paper, we focus on the weight in analysis stage and investigate the effect of such weights imposed on the weighted mean when estimating the population mean. We consider a finite population with a pair of fixed survey value and weight in each unit, and suppose equal selection probability designs. Under the condition we derive the formulas of the bias as well as mean square error of the weighted mean and show that the weighted mean is biased and the direction and amount of the bias can be explained by the correlation between survey variate and weight: if the correlation coefficient is positive, then the weighted mein over-estimates the population mean, on the other hand, if negative, then under-estimates. Also the magnitude of bias is getting larger when the correlation coefficient is getting greater. In addition to theoretical derivation about the weighted mean, we conduct a simulation study to show quantities of the bias and mean square errors numerically. In the simulation, nine weights having correlation coefficient with survey variate from -0.2 to 0.6 are generated and four sample sizes from 100 to 400 are considered and then biases and mean square errors are calculated in each case. As a result, in the case or 400 sample size and 0.55 correlation coefficient, the amount or squared bias of the weighted mean occupies up to 82% among mean square error, which says the weighted mean might be biased very seriously in some cases.

• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.91-96
• /
• 2005

다차원층화에서 선형계획법을 이용한 표본배정 방법은 Winkler(1990, 2001), Sitter와 Skinner(1994, 2002)가 제안하였다. 이 방법들은 표본크기가 층 개수보다 크지 않는 경우에 공통적으로 선형계획법을 이용하여 표본배정을 실시하였다. 반복 비율 적합방법(IPF), 일반화 반복 비율 적합(GIFP), SS 방법을 통해 셀 값을 결정하고 선형계획법을 이용하여 표본의 배정확률을 통해 표본배정을 실시한다. 이 3가지 방법들로 표본을 배정하고 평균 및 분산추정량을 비교한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.389-390
• /
• 2017

대부분의 강의평가는 참여율을 높이기 위해 학생들이 성적확인 이전에 일괄적으로 평가하는 방식으로 강제성을 가지고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 전수조사로 진행되는 강의평가제의 문제점을 지적하면서 모의실험을 통한 표본 강의평가제를 제시하고 표본평균을 이용해 모평균을 추론하는 것이 통계적으로 의미 있다는 것을 확인하고자 한다.