• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.27-47
• /
• 2006

Attempts were made to increase an efficiency of soil contamination investigation systems(SCISs) including Soil Contamination Fact-Finding Investigation Sites and Special Soil Contamination Management Facility Sites in Korea. In order to increase low efficiencies resulting from inappropriate SCISs, possible policy suggestions are driven based on the results from problem findings of Korean policy and comparisons of policies in industrialized countries including United States, United Kingdom, Germany, the Netherlands and Japan. First, functions of Soil Environment Conservation Act(SECA) on liability should be updated and reinforced to initiate a soil contamination investigation process for stakeholders including an owner(s) or a responsible party(ies) of the potentially soil contamination sites positively. Second, appropriate SCISs should be emerged for implementing the Soil Contamination Fact-Finding Investigation Sites and Special Soil Contamination Management Facility Sites properly. Stakeholders for the potentially contaminated sites should easily access and raise the soil contamination issues, and soil contamination investigation implemented by liable and profit environment (consulting) companies should be encouraged. Third, the soil contamination reporting system of SECA needs to change legally responsible. Further more, public announcement system showing soil quality of a site which exceeds a certain scale would be considerable. Fourth, liable environment (consulting) companies should legally execute Soil Environment Assessment of SECA.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment Conference
• /
• 1998.11a
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 1998

토양과 지하수 오염은 오염원이나 그 정화 방법에 있어서 서로 밀접한 관계를 가지고 있으며, 수질오염이나 대기오염과 달리 일단 한번 오염이 되면 오염 정화과정이 매우 복잡하고 어려우면서도 비용이 많이 드는 특성을 갖고 있기 때문에 오염원의 형태에 따른 통합된 관리 및 효율적 정화기술의 적용이 무엇보다 필요하다. 따라서 표준화된 오염조사 절차 (Environmental Site Assessment)를 통해 대상부지를 조사한 후, 확인된 오염원의 정화를 위한 기술을 선정함에 있어 필요한, 오염원·대상부지 특성 및 사업환경에 따른 정화기술에 대해 설명하고, 토양 및 지하수 통합 정화기술의 적용 예를 들어 토양과 지하수를 통합·관리함이 필요함을 살펴보고자 한다.

• Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.62-73
• /
• 2004

The current status and problems of UST management in gas stations were reviewed, and suggestions were made for possible improvement of UST management. Regulations and programs relevant through the whole life cycle of the UST, such as construction, installation, operation, and disclosure are insufficient to prevent oil release. The UST requirements are less stringent compared to those of the U.S. and EU members. Current soil test does not seem to be practically effective in detecting soil contamination caused by oil release. The potential for subsurface contamination due to oil release from the UST is estimated from available data other than soil test results. Much higher following future directions and suggestions are made to improve current unsatisfactory UST management: Firstly, increasing the UST requirements - establishing more stringent standards for new UST facilities, and adding new regulatory requirements for existing UST facilities; secondly, replacing current soil test with the tank and piping tests; thirdly, reinforcing programs for supervising the tank construction and installation; fourthly, constructing a system in which independent gas stations can properly manage the USTs; and lastly, educating UST owners and operators, and constructing DB of UST facilities.

• Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.32-42
• /
• 2020

오염부지 관리 기조가 매체 중심에서 수용체 중심으로 변화하면서 우리나라에 위해성평가 제도가 도입되었으나, 이를 오염현장에 충분히 활용하기 위한 체계와 관련 기술들은 아직 제대로 확립되어 있지 않다. 특히, 여러 가지 이유로 정화곤란부지로 분류가 되는 오염부지의 정화 및 관리와 그러한 부지에 적용될 수 있는 위해저감기술들에 대한 기술적, 사회적 논의와 합의도 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 그동안 오염토양의 정화에만 초점이 맞추어진 우리나라의 토양환경정책이 오염부지의 관점에서 그와 연결된 수용체를 보호하는 방향으로 나아가기 위해 필요한 위해성기반 오염 부지관리 의사결정체계를 제안하고, 그러한 관리체계가 현장에서 적절히 적용되도록 하기 위해 필요한 위해저감기술들을 조사, 분류하여 위해저감 방식에 따른 위해저감기술의 활용성 및 적용성을 평가하는 방안을 제안하였다.

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.87-105
• /
• 2003

토양오염기준은 토지이용별 또는 오염노출경로별 오염토양의 조사, 평가 및 복구를 위한 유용한 지침으로 이용될 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 한국을 포함한 몇몇 국가의 토양오염기준을 특히 중금속에 주안점을 두고 검토하였다. 또한 국내 일부 폐광산 지역의 환경오염 조사결과를 토양오염기준과 비교하며 평가하였다. 영국, 네덜란드, 독일, 캐나다, 일본 등의 국가에서는 복구우선순위 선정과 인체건강 및 생태계 보전을 위한 오염토양의 선별수단으로 토양오염기준을 개발하여 왔다. 국내에서는 1996년 토양환경보전법(시행규칙)의 시행에 따라 토양 오염기준 설정과 특정토양오염유발시설의 관리, 정기적 토양오염도 조사를 실시하고 있으며 이후 2001년 보완 개정되어 토양오염물질의 확대적용과 토양오염 조사, 관리 및 복원 방법의 보완이 이루어진 바 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 현 중금속(Cd, Cu 및 Pb)의 오염기준을 적용할때 폐광산 지역의 폐기물과 이에 오염된 토양의 경우 다량의 중금속을 함유하고 있지만 오염지역으로 규정되지 않을 수도 있다. 이 연구 결과, 0.1N 염산용출법은 중금속의 토양 내 화학적 형태 중 일부 교환성 및 환원성 형태만을 추출하며 황화물 형태를 충분히 용출하지 못하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 장기적인 환경조건 변화에 따른 토양 내 중금속의 용출성 변화를 평가하기 위해서는 강산추출법이 요구되어진다. 따라서 폐광산지 역의 중금속에 의한 토양오염의 타당한 환경평가 결정을 위해 현 분석기법 외에 총함량 분석방법의 병행적용과 이에 따른 새로운 오염기준 설정 등이 필요한 것으로 제시되었다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment Conference
• /
• 2003.10a
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2003

The objectives of this paper are to overview present status of soil pollution in Korea, to review the current policies and management strategies for soil pollution prevention and remediation of contaminated sites, and to suggest some recommendations to be considered toward more efficient policies. Soils in Korea are contaminated mainly by industrial facilities, landfills, underground storage tanks, abandoned/inactive mines, military camps, and other sources. Concentrations of most of soil pollutants were similar to the background levels, except for a few heavily contaminated sites such as industrial sites or abandoned/inactive mines. The Soil Environment Conservation Act (SECA), which was effective from 1995, provides a comprehensive legal framework for both preventing soil pollution and remedying contaminated sites in Korea. The Act includes various management policies such as the designation of standards and soil pollution policy area, soil monitoring networks, management of suspected contamination sources, and extended 'polluter-pays' principle. To make current policies more efficient and reasonable, some policies or strategies such as the establishment of national priority list, more detailed standards, risk-based cleanup goal, fund raise, soil erosion problem, and finally, integrity between soil and groundwater management frameworks may need to be pursued in the long term.

• Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2007

As Total Maximum Daily Load program is being implemented, needs for the management and treatment of contaminated sediment are rising to attain cleaner water resources. In this paper, impacts and management methods of contaminated sediment were reviewed. Remediation technologies for contaminated sediment including dredging, natural attenuation, in situ solidification/stabilization, in situ biological remediation, in situ chemical remediation and capping were reviewed. Integrated remediation scheme was presented as well.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment Conference
• /
• 2004.04a
• /
• pp.5-11
• /
• 2004

The objectives of this study is to find problems in the legal and institutional background on our information system for soil contaminated sites. To achieve this abjective, we compared our system with those of federal and New Jersey state governments of the United States. We found that we have no comprehensive guideline on how various information from the contaminated sites should be manipulated. In our system, some regulations on information management were found only in a few prescriptions on detection, detailed investigation, and remediation phases. However, we found that provisions, detailed procedures, and related guidelines for the information management are provided in tile case of the federal and New Jersey state governments. Also, public involvement and disclosure of tile information for the remediation procedure are designated in their legal systems.

• Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.257-271
• /
• 2017

In Korea, soil is being transported in and taken out for the purpose of national land development, but the soil is being moved without consideration of soil contamination. Therefore, this is a policy-focused study of the management system on soil moving. In this study, we analyzed current state of domestic and foreign management and suggested three alternatives for management of soil moving in 1) self-regulation, 2) obligatory regulation, 3) phase-in according to types of regulation. In order to establish a clear and reasonable management system for soil movement in the future, it is necessary to improve the legal and institutional limitations of the current soil environmental law as suggested by this study.

• Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.18-28
• /
• 2009

Many countries have recently established legal regulations and soil quality standards for soil protection, This study investigated the role of soil quality standards in soil protection policy and methods of selecting standard substances from various types of chemicals. In most countries, soil quality standards act as guidance for further detail surveyor risk assessment from comparing soil concentration with the soil quality standards. Soil quality standards of Switzerland, Demark and Japan were used as enforcement tools. Priority substances for the standards were first selected from frequently detected chemicals in contaminated sites. Those substances were extensively evaluated for toxic effects, exposure potential and availability in chemical analysis.