• Title/Summary/Keyword: 토마스 영

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Thomas Young's Problem Solving through Analogical Reasoning in the Process of Light Inference Theory Formation and Its Implications for Scientific Creativity Education (창의적 과학자 토마스 영(T. Young)의 빛의 간섭 이론 형성과정에서의 비유추론을 통한 문제해결과 과학창의성 교육적 함의)

  • Kim, Wonsook;Kim, Youngmin;Seo, Hae-Ae;Park, Jongseok
    • Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
    • /
    • v.23 no.5
    • /
    • pp.817-833
    • /
    • 2013
  • The study aims to analyze Thomas Young's problem solving processes of analogical reasoning during the formation of the interference theory of light, and to draw its implications for secondary science education, particularly for enhancing creativity in science. The research method employed in the study was literature review of the papers which Young himself had written about sound wave and property of light. His thinking processes and specific features in his thought that were obtained through analysis of his papers about light are as follows: Young reconsidered Newton's experiments and observations, and reinterpreted Newton's results in the new viewpoints. Through this analysis, Young discovered that Newton's interpretation about his own experiments and observations was faulty in a certain point of view and new interpretation is necessary. Based on the data, it is hypothesized that colors observed on thin plates and colors appeared repeatedly on Newton's ring are appeared because of the effect of light interference. Young used analogical reasoning during the process of inference of similarity between sound and light. And he formulated an hypothesis on the interference of light through using abductive reasoning from interference of water wave, and proved the hypothesis by constructing an creative experimental device, which is called a critical experiment. It is implicated that the analogical reasoning and experimental devices for explaining the light interference which Young created and used can be utilized for school science education enhancing creativity in science.

Between Dystopia and Utopia A Comparative Study on Cormac MacCarthy's The Road and J.M. Coetzee's The Childhood of Jesus (디스토피아와 유토피아 사이 - 코멕 매카시의 『더 로드』와 존 쿳시의 『예수의 어린시절』 비교연구)

  • Jeon, So-Young
    • Cross-Cultural Studies
    • /
    • v.40
    • /
    • pp.91-110
    • /
    • 2015
  • Both Plato and More imagined alternative ways of organizing society. What is common to both authors, then, is the fact that they resorted to fiction to discuss other options. They differed, however, in the way they presented that fiction. The concept of utopia is no doubt an attribute of modern thought, and one of its most visible consequences. But one of the main features of utopia as a literary genre is its relationship with reality. Utopists depart from the observation of the society they live in, note down the aspects that need to be changed and imagine a place where those problems have been solved. After the two World Wars, the twentieth century was predominantly characterized by man's disappointment at the perception of his own nature. In this context, utopian ideals seemed absurd and the floor was inevitably left to dystopian discourse. Both The Road by Cormac MacCarthy and The Childhood of Jesus by J. M. Coetzee can be called critical dystopia and critical utopia as they represent the imaginary place and time that author intended a contemporaneous reader to view as better or worse than contemporary society but with difficult problems that the described society may or may not be able to solve. As a changed adventure narrative, they have something in common like open ending, father and son relationship and religious allegory. But the most important thing is that they express the utopian impulse that is still energetic and transforming in the post-modern society.