• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.40 no.1
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2024

Purpose: To histologically evaluate the effects of three calcium silicate-based sealers on rat mandible tissue. Materials and Methods: Rats were randomly divided as follows: A group that sacrificed immediately after cavity preparation, a group that sacrificed two weeks after cavity preparation, a group that sacrificed two weeks after CeraSeal (CS), AH Plus Bioceramic (AHB), or One-Fil (OF) sealer injection, respectively. After tissue processing for all groups, the bone tissue area (%) and the number of osteoclasts in and around the cavity were measured under a microscope. The results of each group were compared and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results: The formation of bone tissue and the presence of osteoclasts in the cavity were observed in the group that sacrificed two weeks after cavity preparation and the group sacrificed two weeks after AHB sealer injection, and these groups showed significantly higher average bone tissue area (%) than the other groups. In the other groups, no inflammation or foreign body reaction occurred in the cavity, and no osteoclasts were observed. Conclusion: All calcium silicate-based sealers used in this study showed a favorable bone tissue response when injected into the rat mandible. In particular, higher bone formation in the cavity was observed in AHB.

• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.213-221
• /
• 2022

Purpose: The efficacy of the amount of sealer in the root canal and two retreatment NiTi file systems in removing filling materials. Materials and Methods: Extracted premolars with a single root canal were selected for this study. After access opening and root canal preparation up to size #40/.06, the specimens were randomly divided into four groups. Gutta percha (GP) tapers of .06 or .04 were used for each group and filled using a single-cone filling technique with CeraSeal, a calcium silicate-based sealer. Each group was retreated either using the ProTaper Universal Retreatment System (PTUR) or the Hyflex Remover (HR). The time taken to remove the filling material, the amounts of apically extruded debris, and canal cleanliness were measured and compared. Results: The amount of sealer did not affect the efficiency when removing the filling materials. However, the filling material was removed faster in the HR group than in the PTUR group. Two types of NiTi files showed similar retreatment effects in the amounts of apically extruded debris and in the degree of canal cleanliness. Conclusion: The amount of sealer in canal filling had no significant effect on retreatability. Retreatment with HR removed filling materials is faster than PTUR. There was no difference in other removal efficiencies according to the type of retreatment NiTi file.