Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of calcium silicate-based sealer to bone tissue of mandible of rats

칼슘 실리케이트 계열 실러가 흰쥐의 하악골 조직에 미치는 영향

  • Jee-Seon Tae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Ki-Yeon Yoo (Department of Anatomy, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Jin-Woo Kim (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kyung-Mo Cho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Yoon Lee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Se-Hee Park (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 태지선 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 유기연 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김진우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조경모 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이윤 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박세희 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Received : 2023.11.20
  • Accepted : 2023.12.12
  • Published : 2024.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To histologically evaluate the effects of three calcium silicate-based sealers on rat mandible tissue. Materials and Methods: Rats were randomly divided as follows: A group that sacrificed immediately after cavity preparation, a group that sacrificed two weeks after cavity preparation, a group that sacrificed two weeks after CeraSeal (CS), AH Plus Bioceramic (AHB), or One-Fil (OF) sealer injection, respectively. After tissue processing for all groups, the bone tissue area (%) and the number of osteoclasts in and around the cavity were measured under a microscope. The results of each group were compared and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results: The formation of bone tissue and the presence of osteoclasts in the cavity were observed in the group that sacrificed two weeks after cavity preparation and the group sacrificed two weeks after AHB sealer injection, and these groups showed significantly higher average bone tissue area (%) than the other groups. In the other groups, no inflammation or foreign body reaction occurred in the cavity, and no osteoclasts were observed. Conclusion: All calcium silicate-based sealers used in this study showed a favorable bone tissue response when injected into the rat mandible. In particular, higher bone formation in the cavity was observed in AHB.

목적: 세 가지 칼슘 실리케이트 계열 실러가 흰쥐 하악골 조직에 미치는 영향을 조직학적으로 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 흰쥐의 하악골에 와동을 형성하고 즉시 또는 2주 후 희생한 군, 와동에 CeraSeal (CS), AH Plus Bioceramic (AHB), One-Fil (OF) 실러를 각각 주입하여 2주 후 희생한 군으로 무작위 배정하였다. 모든 군을 조직 처리하고 현미경 하에서 와동 내외 평균 골 면적 분율(%)을 계산하고 파골세포를 계수하였고, 각 군의 결과를 비교하고 일원분산 분석 및 Tukey's test로 통계 분석하였다. 결과: 와동 형성 2주 후 희생한 대조군과 AHB 실러 주입 2주 후 희생한 군에서 와동 내 골조직 형성과 파골세포의 존재를 확인할 수 있었고, 다른 군들에 비해 유의하게 높은 와동 내 골 면적 분율(%)을 보여주었다. 다른 군들에서는 와동 내 어떠한 염증이나 이물 반응이 나타나지 않고 파골세포 또한 관찰되지 않았다. 결론: 실험에 사용된 칼슘 실리케이트 계열 실러는 흰쥐 하악골에 주입하였을 때 양호한 골조직 반응을 보였고, 특히 AHB에서 더 높은 와동 내 골조직 형성이 관찰되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2022년도 강릉원주대학교치과병원 협동임상연구비(CR2202) 지원에 의하여 수행되었음.

References

  1. Friedman S, Torneck CD, Komorowski R, Ouzounian Z, Syrtash P, Kaufman A. In vivo model for assessing the functional efficacy of endodontic filling materials and techniques. J Endod 1997;23:557-61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81120-9
  2. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature-Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008;41:6-31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01323.x
  3. Onay EO, Ungor M, Orucoglu H. An in vitro evaluation of the apical sealing ability of a new resin-based root canal obturation system. J Endod 2006;32:976-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.05.013
  4. Santos JM, Pereira S, Sequeira DB, Messias AL, Martins JB, Cunha H, Palma PJ, Santos AC. Biocompatibility of a bioceramic silicone-based sealer in subcutaneous tissue. J Oral Sci 2019;61:171-7.  https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.18-0145
  5. Gluskin AH. Mishaps and serious complications in endodontic obturation. Endod Topics 2005;12:52-70.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00194.x
  6. Holland R, Sant'anna Junior A, de Souza V, Dezan Junior E, Otoboni Filho JA, Bernabe BF, Nery MJ, Murata SS. Influence of apical patency and filling material on healing process of dogs' teeth with vital pulp after root canal therapy. Braz Dent J 2005;16:9-16.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402005000100002
  7. Goldberg F, Cantarini C, Alfie D, Macchi RL, Arias A. Relationship between unintentional canal overfilling and the long-term outcome of primary root canal treatments and nonsurgical retreatments: a retrospective radiographic assessment. Int Endod J 2020;53:19-26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13209
  8. Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, Fleury A, Solomon E, He J. Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using a single-cone technique with endosequence bioceramic sealer: a retrospective analysis. J Endod 2018;44:941-5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.019
  9. Dos Santos Costa FM, Fernandes MH, Batistuzzo de Medeiros SR. Genotoxicity of root canal sealers: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:3347-62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03478-z
  10. Tanomaru Filho M, Leonardo MR, Silva L, Utrilla LS. Effect of different root canal sealers on periapical repair of teeth with chronic periradicular periodontitis. lnt Endod J 1998;31:85-9.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00134.x
  11. Fristad I, Molven O, Halse A. Nonsurgically retreated root filled teeth - radiographic findings after 20-27 years. lnt Endod J 2004;37:12-8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00743.x
  12. Palma PJ, Ramos JC, Martins JB, Diogenes A, Figueiredo MH, Ferreira P, Viegas C, Santos JM. Histologic evaluation of regenerative endodontic procedures with the use of chitosan scaffolds in immature dog teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2017;43:1279-87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.005
  13. Donnermeyer D, Burklein S, Dammaschke T, Schafer E. Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontology 2019;107:421-36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-018-0400-3
  14. Sfeir G, Zogheib C, Patel S, Giraud T, Nagendrababu V, Bukiet F. Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: A narrative review and clinical perspectives. Materials 2021;14:3965. 
  15. Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Collado-Gonzalez M, Tomas-Catala CJ, Garcia-Bernal D, Lopez S, Onate-Sanchez RE, Moraleda JM, Murcia L. GuttaFlow Bioseal promotes spontaneous differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells into cementoblast-like cells. Dent Mater 2019;35:114-24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.003
  16. Kim M, Hayashi M, Yu B, Lee TK, Kim RH, Jo DW. Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Epoxy Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers before and after Setting Procedures. Life (Basel) 2022;12:847. 
  17. Silva Almeida LH, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Pappen FG. Are Premixed Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers Comparable to Conventional Materials? A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod 2017;43:527-35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.019
  18. Zoufan K, Jiang J, Komabayashi T, Wang YH, Safavi KE, Zhu Q. Cytotoxicity evaluation of Gutta flow and endo sequence BC sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:657-61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.050
  19. Park MG, Kim IR, Kim HJ, Kwak SW, Kim HC. Physicochemical properties and cytocompatibility of newly developed calcium silicate-based sealers. Aust Endod J 2021;47:512-9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12515
  20. Koo J, Kwak SW, Kim HC. Differences in setting time of calcium silicate-based sealers under different test conditions. J Dent Sci 2023;18:1042-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2022.11.029
  21. Schmidmaier G, Wildemann B, Melis B, Krummrey G, Einhorn TA, Haas NP, Raschke M. Development and characterization of a standard closed tibial fracture model in the rat. Eur J Trauma 2004;30:35-42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-004-1322-z
  22. Claes L, Blakytny R, Gockelmann M, Schoen M, Ignatius A, Willie B. Early dynamization by reduced fixation stiffness does not improve fracture healing in a rat femoral osteotomy model. J Orthop Res 2009;27:22-7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20712
  23. Histing T, Garcia P, Holstein JH, Klein M, Matthys R, Nuetzi R, Steck R, Laschke MW, Wehner T, Bindl R, Recknagel S, Stuermer EK, Vollmar B, Wildemann B, Lienau J, Willie B, Peters A, Ignatius A, Pohlemann T, Claes L, Menger MD. Small animal bone healing models: standards, tips, and pitfalls results of a consensus meeting. Bone 2011;49:591-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.007
  24. Bagi CM, Berryman E, Moalli MR. Comparative bone anatomy of commonly used laboratory animals: implications for drug discovery. Comp Med 2011;61:76-85. 
  25. Moretton TR, Brown Jr CE, Legan JJ, Kafrawy AH. Tissue reactions after subcutaneous and intraosseous implantation of mineral trioxide aggregate and ethoxybenzoic acid cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:528-33.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20001205)52:3<528::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-9
  26. Cintra LTA, de Moraes IG, Estrada BPF, Gomes-Filho JE, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, Bernardinelli N. Evaluation of the tissue response to MTA and MBPC: Microscopic analysis of implants in alveolar bone of rats. J Endod 2006;32:556-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.07.007
  27. Assmann E, Bottcher DE, Hoppe CB, Grecca FS, Kopper PMP. Evaluation of bone tissue response to a sealer containing mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod 2015;41:62-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.019
  28. Almeida LH, Gomes APN, Gastmann AH, Pola NM, Moraes RR, Morgental RD, Cava SS, Felix AOC, Pappen FG. Bone tissue response to an MTA-based endodontic sealer, and the effect of the addition of calcium aluminate and silver particles. Int Endod J 2019;52:1446-56.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13135
  29. Figueiredo JA, Pesce HF, Gioso MA, Figueiredo MA. The histological effects of four endodontic sealers implanted in the oral mucosa: submucous injection versus implant in polyethylene tubes. Int Endod J 2001;34:377-85.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00407.x
  30. Trejo-Iriarte CG, Serrano-Bello J, Gutierrez-Escalona R, Mercado-Marques C, Garcia-Honduvilla N, Bujan-Varela J, Medina LA. Evaluation of bone regeneration in a critical size cortical bone defect in rat mandible using microCT and histological analysis. Arch Oral Biol 2019;101:165-71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.01.010
  31. Lopez-Garcia S, Baek MH, Lozano A, Garcia-Bernal D, Forner L, Llena C, Guerrero-Girones J, Murcia L, Rodriguez-Lozano FJ. Cytocompatibility, bioactivity potential, and ion release of three premixed calcium silicate-based sealers. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:1749-59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03036-2
  32. Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Lopez-Garcia S, Garcia-Bernal D, Tomas-Catala CJ, Santos JM, Llena C, Lozano A, Murcia L, Forner L. Chemical composition and bioactivity potential of the new Endosequence BC Sealer formulation HiFlow. Int Endod J 2020;53:1216-28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13327
  33. Pinheiro LS, Iglesias JE, Boijink D, Mestieri LB, Kopper PMP, de Poli Figueiredo JA, Grecca FS. Cell viability and tissue reaction of NeoMTA Plus: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Endod 2018;44:1140-5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.03.007
  34. Giacomino CM, Wealleans JA, Kuhn N, Diogenes A. Comparative biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of two bioceramic sealers. J Endod 2019;45:51-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.007
  35. Zamparini F, Prati C, Taddei P, Spinelli A, Di Foggia M, Gandolfi MG. Chemical-Physical Properties and Bioactivity of New Premixed Calcium Silicate-Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:13914. 
  36. Santos JM, Coelho CM, Sequeira DB, Marques JA, Pereira JF, Sousa V, Palma PJ, Santos AC. Subcutaneous Implantation Assessment of New Calcium-Silicate Based Sealer for Warm Obturation. Biomedicines 2021;9:24. 
  37. Wada T, Nakashima T, Hiroshi N, Penninger JM. RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease. Trends Mol Med 2006;12:17-25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2005.11.007
  38. Rufo A, Del Fattore A, Capulli M, Carvello F, De Pasquale L, Ferrari S, Pierroz D, Morandi L, De Simone M, Rucci N, Bertini E, Bianchi ML, De Benedetti F, Teti A. Mechanisms inducing low bone density in Duchenne muscular dystrophy in mice and humans. J Bone Miner Res 2011;26:1891-903.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.410
  39. Sanz JL, Lopez-Garcia S, Rodriguez-Lozano FJ, Melo M, Lozano A, Llena C, Forner L. Cytocompatibility and bioactive potential of AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer: An in vitro study. Int Endod J 2022;55:1066-80.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13805
  40. Kuboki Y, Takita H, Kobayashi D, Tsuruga E, Inoue M, Murata M, Nagai N, Dohi Y, Ohgushi H. BMP-induced osteogenesis on the surface of hydroxyapatite with geometrically feasible and nonfeasible structures: topology of osteogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:190-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199802)39:2<190::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-K