• Title/Summary/Keyword: 친환경 인증

Search Result 371, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Subject Selection Model of Green VE for Sustainable Design (친환경건축물 설계를 위한 Green VE 대상선정모델)

  • Song, Chang-Yeob;Moon, Hyun-Seok;Hyun, Chang-Taek
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.12 no.3
    • /
    • pp.42-52
    • /
    • 2011
  • As environmental issues are rising recently efforts to reduce environmental stress are emerging in all industry segments. Especially environmental impact of buildings occupy a critical portion, so each country is operating green building rating system for life cycle of buildings. Accordingly green building rating system for every facility is operating in Korea. And acquisition of grade I for building energy efficiency is mandatory for every new public buildings since 2010. To design green building efficiently and systematically eco-friendly elements should be considered and checked from the schematic design phase. But in many cases eco-friendly elements are checked at the end of constructed design phase. So applying eco-friendly elements at the value engineering process, which is performing through schematic and constructed design phase, could make a efficient and systematic green building design. Value engineering process is divided into pre workshop, workshop and post workshop stages. And subject selection in pre workshop stage is the step that finds out the subjects which has the great possibility to be improved to perform efficient value engineering workshop. So this study present the Green VE subject selection model to select the most considerable eco-friendly subjects in projects.

A Study on the Effect and Improvement Directions of KGBCC based on the Comparison of Green Residents Satisfaction (친환경 주거단지의 거주자 만족도 비교를 통한 친환경 건축물 인증제도 효과 및 개선방향 연구)

  • Kwon, Hyuk-Jin;Yeom, Dong-Woo;Lee, Kyu-In
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • v.11 no.5
    • /
    • pp.79-90
    • /
    • 2011
  • The KGBCC(Korean Green Building Certification Criteria), which is the assessment standard of green buildings, is not enough to reflect all the current demands of residents. Therefore, the comparative analysis between the certification score and the residents' satisfaction of a promotional green apartment, a awarded green apartment, and a certified green building apartment was carried out to derive improvements of the KGBCC. The residents of selected three apartments were surveyed through the assessment items of the KGBCC. According to the research, the certified green building apartment shows the highest certification score and residents' satisfaction overall, compared with other two apartments. Finally, the improvements of KGBCC were determined through the reason of the residents' dissatisfaction. The KGBCC that is improved by this study can be used for the new assessment standard of green buildings.

Consurmer's Recognition for the Label System and Policy of Environment-Friendly Agricultural Products (친환경 농산물의 인증제도 및 정책에 대한 소비자 인지도 조사연구)

  • Sin, Chul-Ro;Kim, Jin-Suk
    • Journal of agriculture & life science
    • /
    • v.43 no.3
    • /
    • pp.63-75
    • /
    • 2009
  • The purpose of this study is to find out suggestions for government policy and expansion of consumption of environmental-friendly agricultural products(EFAP). For this purpose, we did research on purchasing pattern of EFAP and understanding of government environmental-friendly agricultural policy. First, the purchase of EFAP has been increased, because EFAP is safer. Consumers prefer department store because it is easier than any other marketing. Difficulties which consumers are facing when they purchase EFAP are price and credibility and small number of stores. Most favorable item is vegetable and the price of rice which consumers are willing to pay is really high. Second, not many consumers do recognize the label and system of EFAP. Third, most famous authentication institution agricultural products quality management service and other institutions are not recognized. Consumers recognize the certificate of origin. The government policy for safe food consumption is to intensify government supervision on foods. Suggestions from these results are as follow: First, the urgent problem to expand consumption of EFAP is credibility of EFAP. To make consumers trust EFAP, these are considered as useful solutions, i.e. recall, quality management service, standardization, and better quality. Second, government should be continue public relation, education and supervision of EFAP. Third, quality management should be continued. Not only central government but also local quality management institutions should continue quality management service. Last, local government should help farmers of EFAP to solve the difficulties of marketing.

건강과 자연농업-제234호

  • Korea Organic Farming Association
    • THE HEALTH and ORGANIC FARMING
    • /
    • no.234
    • /
    • pp.1-12
    • /
    • 2007
  • '福돼지띠' 정해년(丁亥年)의 새해 열매를 더욱 알차게!!/우리의 산야초-수선화/과수 양분의 저장과 집적부위 및 저장시기의 이해가 중요/제5회 친환경 유기농박람회 개최/홍재륜 부회장, 제5회 경북 농업명장에 선정/누가 군대의 유기농 급식을 반대하랴/EU, 유기농 식품의 영양적 효능 과학적으로 입증-유기농 재배 농산물 다량의 항암물질 및 비타민 함유/두가지 비료로 유기농작물의 고품질 다수확 생산을 체계적으로 보다 쉽게 하는 방법/마늘 잎마름병/토양 전염성 병해/금산.정읍 인증농가대상으로 인증자교육 실시/친환경 유기농식품 대량 수요처 시급/젓갈에서 추출한 균으로 친환경 미생물 농약 개발/벼 멀칭재배의 이론과 기술/세계 전 인류의 최대 식량자원인 감자 산업의 전망/농림부.환경부 공동 제3회 친환경농업대상 시상/유기농업으로 이룬 쿠바의 낙원/유기질비료의 이해

  • PDF

The Analysis of Evaluation Items of Korea Green Building Certification Criteria in Office Building - Focusing on the Case Study of Office Building Certificated by GBCC from 2010 to 2012 - (국내 업무시설 부문의 친환경건축물 인증 평가항목 분석 - 2010년~2012년 국내 친환경 인증 업무시설의 사례 분석을 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, Chang-Sung
    • Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal
    • /
    • v.22 no.2
    • /
    • pp.11-19
    • /
    • 2013
  • Korea Government have carried out various policies to save the Earth environment from global warming and environmental pollution. It has also executed the Green Building Certification Criteria(GBCC) in 2002. The GBCC of office building was executed in 2003 and was revised twice in 2010 and 2011. Concerns about green building construction were quite increasing to keep the building performances sustainable. The aims of this paper is to check the reliability of weighting factors and scoring difficulties in all assessment categories of GBCC and to suggest the amendment direction of the future assessment criteria for green building. For the study, the old and new version of GBCC were examined to present the revision direction of GBCC and the 10 cases certificated by the old and new version, respectively 5 were analysed to compare with the difficulties in obtaining the certification. According to the results of the study, the GBCC requires additional amendments about the assessment categories of the energy consumption monitoring and the building commissioning as required subjects in order to secure the building performances. In addition, the operation mamagement of the building need to be assessed more intensively.

A Comparative Research of Assessment System Development for Low Carbon and Sustainable Neighborhood (친환경 근린주구 인증제도 개발을 위한 국내외 인증제도 비교연구 : 탄소를 중심으로)

  • Shin, Eun-Mi;Lee, Byeongho;Shin, Sung-Woo
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • v.13 no.3
    • /
    • pp.21-26
    • /
    • 2013
  • Recently, as the concern over environmental problem has been serious all over the world, carbon has become a key issue to mitigate the problem. In the field of Architecture, various sustainable assessment systems and LCCO2 assessment strategies have been developed, guiding low carbon building while planning. However, assessment system for low carbon neighborhood, which can be more efficient strategy, is still in the stage of research. In this paper, as a research for low carbon assessment system and planning guideline for neighborhood, scope meeting domestic condition has been set and sustainable assessment system for neighborhood, which is similar to low carbon concept, have been compared. LEED-Neighborhood Development, BREEAM-Communities, CASBEE-Urban Development, and GBCC-Apartment Houses were used for comparison. As a result, it is found that those systems has many differences in judging system, aggregating method, scope of evaluation, and relations with a building assessment system. The concern about carbon is not insufficient yet. Finally, assessment system for low carbon neighborhood, which is not only for establishing the plan, but also for giving guideline at the very first state of the plan, should be developed as fast as passible. With the result of this paper, establishment of assessment criteria and the way to measure quantitative $CO_2$ should be studied forward.

건강과 자연농업-제229호

  • Jeong, Jin-Yeong
    • THE HEALTH and ORGANIC FARMING
    • /
    • no.229
    • /
    • pp.1-12
    • /
    • 2006
  • 한.미 자유무역협상(FTA) 서둘지 말아야/학교급식은 직영해야 한다/우리의 산야초/연속 강우에 따른 과일나무 잎의 갈변에 대하여/벼 멀칭재배의 이론과 기술/소화불량증과 생활습관/아이들건강과 먹을거리 패러다임의 전환/제7회 동아시아 친환경 벼 심포지엄/홍성서,제5회 아시아 오리농법대회/두가지 비료로 유기농작물의 고품질 다수확 생산을 체계적으로 보다 쉽게 하는 방법/충남,친환경농업 육성 '박차'/벼흰잎마름병은 어떤 병인가?/빛을 이용한 해충의 방제/제천 명암 환경농업 작목반/국내외 친환경농축산물의 생산 및 인증실태/남양주시에서 친환경농산물 인증서 수여 및 인증자 교육 실시/해충의 습성을 이용한 퇴치/7월중 새식구 명단/예산당국,내년 유기질비료 예산 '동결' 토양개량제 '감축' 방침/제9회 충남유기농업인대회/충북도지부 월례회의/불량비료 17개 제품 적발/방제비용 절감 '친환경보조제'개발/농진청, '탑프루트' 프로젝트 적용과실 본격출하/유기 및 일반 농산물의 품질 비교에 관한 연구/당도진단

  • PDF

Analysis on Weight Proportion of Eco-friendly Elements for the Development of Low-Carbon Green City : Case of Eco-Environment Certified Apartment Housing Complexes in the Metropolitan Newtown (저탄소 녹색도시 조성을 위한 친환경 요소의 비중도 분석: 수도권 신도시내 친환경 인증 아파트단지 사례)

  • Jung, Sung-Hoon;Kim, Jeong-In
    • Journal of Environmental Policy
    • /
    • v.10 no.3
    • /
    • pp.21-48
    • /
    • 2011
  • The paper affirms the weight proportion concept as an element, which could be empirically analyzed quantitatively through the developmental expansion of qualitative empirical analysis on taxonomy that is required for the construction Low-Carbon Green Cities and their eco-friendly elements, such as a pleasant residential environment The weight proportion concept is proposed as a new measure to identify eco-friendly elements and as an objective assessment indicators. To perform an empirical analysis, surveys were first given to the residents of Metropolitan Newtown (50 persons) and outside experts (50 persons) for the total of 100 persons. Second, the paper surveyed 74 sites of Eco-Environmental Certified Apartment Housing Complexes. Upon analysis of eco-friendly elements by their type and total weight, the largest weight proportion was expressed in the interior and eco-environmental elements, carbon-decrease types, and carbon-absorption types. The results of this paper confirm recent positive sentiments and preference toward a variety of future-oriented and sustainable eco-friendly elements like the eco-housing and new renewable energy, In addition, the paper affirmed the new housing trend towards constructing eco-friendly elements, such as carbon-decrease and carbon-absorption, that induce long-term investments, despite their need for higher investments.

  • PDF

Comparison of Environmental Impacts of Green and Traditional Buildings using Life Cycle Assessment (전과정평가(LCA)를 이용한 친환경 인증 건축물과 일반 건축물의 환경영향 비교 사례 연구)

  • Hong, Taehoon;Jeong, Kwangbok;Ji, Changyoon
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.15 no.3
    • /
    • pp.58-65
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study aims to understand the environmental impact reduction of green buildings that are certified by Green standard for energy and environmental design(G-SEED). To ensure this end, this study assessed and compared the environmental impacts(global warning, ozone layer depletion, acidification, and eutrophication) of a G-SEED-certified elementary school building(green building) and an uncertified elementary school building(traditional building) using the life cycle assessment methodology. This study considered the environmental impacts from the material manufacturing, material transportation, on-site construction, and operation during 40 years. The comparison of the environmental impact intensity of two buildings showed that the green building generated much more environmental impacts than the traditional building. For example, the global warming potential of the green building was approximately 12.5% higher than of the traditional building since the global warming potential of the green building was 3.751 $t-CO_2eq./m^2$ while that of the traditional building was 3.282 $t-CO_2eq./m^2$. It signifies that the G-SEED doesn't guarantee the reduction of the environmental impacts in terms of four impact categories. Therefore, the G-SEED should be complemented and improved to achieve the environmental impact reduction.