• Title/Summary/Keyword: 치소 침습

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Cosmetic Grinding Revisited (Cosmetic Grinding의 재조명)

  • Lee, Dong-Hwan;Chung, Wounho
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.134-142
    • /
    • 2015
  • Esthetic dentistry has been developed through the diverse material and technique. Approach and interest in esthetic of anteriors was driven by needs and wants of patients. Alpha and omega of esthetics is determined by patients, as Charles Pincus who is the pioneer of esthetic dentistry described in his article 1967. To meet with wants and needs of patients, dentists suggest possible various treatment options. Cosmetic grinding quoted by Pincus is one of the conservative approaches and provide effective esthetic improvement with minimal invasive concepts. In a high technology era, cosmetic grinding needs to be revisited. Review of some clinical cases shows the value and limitation of it.

Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy with Dor Fundoplication in Achalasia -One case report - (식도이완불능증에시 복강경을 이용한 식도근절개술 및 전방위저주름술 - 1예 보고 -)

  • Kim Yeon Soo;Ryoo Ji Yoon
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.38 no.3 s.248
    • /
    • pp.258-262
    • /
    • 2005
  • An 18-year old woman had dysphagia and frequent vomiting after meals for 6 years. She lost 15 kg in 6 months recently. After esophageal manometry, she was diagnosed with achalasia. We decided to use laparoscopic surgery because there was no symptomatic improvement after medication. We made small 5 incisions on her abdomen. We performed Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. We performed esophagogram one day after the operation. There was no leakage of the contrast media, and it passed well. She started to eat at the 2nd day after the operation and was discharged on the 9th day without other specific problem.

Comparison of the Operative Results of Performing Endoscopic Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Conventional Cardiac Surgery (수술용 내시경 로봇(AESOP)을 이용한 최소 침습적 개심술과 동 기간에 시행된 전통적인 개심술의 결과에 대한 비교)

  • Lee, Young-Ook;Cho, Joon-Yong;Lee, Jong-Tae;Kim, Gun-Jik
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.41 no.5
    • /
    • pp.598-604
    • /
    • 2008
  • Background: The improvements in endoscopic equipment and surgical robots has encouraged the performance of minimally invasive cardiac operations. Yet only a few Korean studies have compared this procedure with the sternotomy approach. Material and Method: Between December 2005 and July 2007, 48 patients (group A) underwent minimally invasive cardiac surgery with AESOP through a small right thoracotomy. During the same period, 50 patients (group B) underwent conventional surgery. We compared the operative time, the operative results, the post-operative pain and the recovery of both groups. Result: There was no hospital mortality and there were no significant differences in the incidence of operative complications between the two groups. The operative $(292.7{\pm}61.7\;and\;264.0{\pm}47.9min$, respectively; p=0.01) and CPB times ($128.4{\pm}37.6\;and\;101.7{\pm}32.5min$, respectively; <0.01) were longer for group A, whereas there was no difference between the aortic cross clamp times ($82.1{\pm}35.0\;and\;87.8{\pm}113.5min$, respectively; p=0.74) and ventilator times ($18.0{\pm}18.4\;and\;19.7{\pm}9.7$ hr, respectively; p=0.57) between the groups. The stay on the ICU $(53.2{\pm}40.2\;and\;72.8{\pm}42.1hr$, respectively; p=0.02) and the hospitalization time ($9.7{\pm}7.2\;and\;14.8{\pm}11.9days$, respectively; p=0.01) were shorter for group A. The Patients in group B had more transfusions, but the difference was not significant. For the overall operative intervals, which ranged from one to four weeks, the pair score was significantly lower for the patients of group A than for the patients of group B. In terms of the postoperative activities, which were measured by the Duke Activity Scale questionnaire, the functional status score was clearly higher for group A compared to group B. The analysis showed no difference in the severity of either post-repair of mitral ($0.7{\pm}1.0\;and\;0.9{\pm}0.9$, respectively; p=0.60) and tricuspid regurgitation ($1.0{\pm}0.9\;and\;1.1{\pm}1.0$, respectively; p=0.89). In both groups, there were no valve related complications, except for one patient with paravalvular leakage in each group. Conclusion: These results show that compared with the median sternotomy patients, the patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery enjoyed significant postoperative advantages such as less pain, a more rapid return to full activity, improved cosmetics and a reduced hospital stay. The minimally invasive surgery can be done with similar clinical safety compared to the conventional surgery that's done through a median sternotomy.