• 발명특허
• /
• v.12 no.1 s.131
• /
• pp.44-47
• /
• 1987

• 발명특허
• /
• v.12 no.2 s.132
• /
• pp.42-45
• /
• 1987

• 발명특허
• /
• v.12 no.3 s.133
• /
• pp.60-65
• /
• 1987

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.97-118
• /
• 2015

As China has quickly emerged as a global economic power, the total number of international commercial disputes arbitrated by Chinese arbitral institutions has increased dramatically. Along with this, the annulment procedure of arbitral awards in China have been newly brought to the fore. In accordance with the historical background and the demand of the times, the Chinese annulment procedure of arbitral awards reveals distinctive Chinese features. Although it was enacted in the face ofof an unwarranted prejudice against the dispute settlement system by arbitration as well as a deep mistrust of domestic arbitral institutions, the annulment procedure of arbitral awards showed a certain degree of justification and rationality in its initial stages of legislation. However, it is also the case that it has not adapted well to new domestic or foreign arbitration circumstances in the last twenty years. At present, there is a keen interest in revisions to and debates on arbitration law of China. It is necessary to take an active part in the amendment discussion and process of arbitration law. Moreover, we need to reform the annulment procedure of arbitral awards in order to meet the global trend of arbitration law.

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.3-28
• /
• 2014

This article examines the Annulment Mechanism of arbitral awards rendered under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The primary feature in the ICSID and non-ICSID arbitration regarding the review of awards involves the unified nature of the ICSID system, as compared to the scattered and multi-layered system of review existing under arbitration rules, national legislation, and international convention. This unity can be perceived at different levels. The ICSID annulment mechanism entails only a set of rules; thus, only one set of application standards of review will be implemented, as opposed to sometimes conflicting layers of application rules, laws, and convention, as in the case of non-ICSID arbitration. However, some of the recent annulment decisions have raised serious questions about the breadth of annulment in practice, as opposed to its original design. Nonetheless, implementing a new system under the ICSID awards to be reviewed by an appellate court appears to create more problems than it solves. The potential impact of introducing that mechanism could result in a longer and more complex proceeding, with uncertain benefits.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.134
• /
• pp.16-27
• /
• 2007

부당공동행위 관련제도의 전반적인 변화과정에서 논란의 소지가 있는 과징금 및 손해배상제도에 대한 경제적.법리적 분석을 통하여 부당공동행위에 대한 실질적이고 합리적인 규제의 틀을 모색할 필요가 있다. 나아가 과징금부과처분에 대한 관련 취소청구소송사례들에서 나타난 재량권 남용과 일탈을 줄이기 위한 적절한 방안도 모색되어야 한다.

• 주류산업
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.53-56
• /
• 2001

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.113-142
• /
• 2018

In recent years, there have been opinions in which physicians are liable to the revocation of their medical license if they are sentenced to above a certain level for criminal charges regardless of the types of offenses. Accordingly, a revised bill of law was submitted in the National Assembly, and related discussions are thus expected to commence. Considering the morality and ethics or the level of the rule of law that the general public expects of physicians, as well as the license revocation system in other professional sectors, it is assessed that medical license revocation due to criminal convictions of physicians is appropriate to some degree. However, if a poorly devised system is established based on unrefined inferences or emotional judgements, unexpected side-effects are likely to arise. With regard to serious criminal acts that society generally perceives as unacceptable, it can be assessed that the revocation of physicians' licenses would appropriately protect the general public from threats. However, given the life-saving characteristics of high-risk medical practices, higher malpractice exposures, and social values, it is difficult to assess charges of professional negligence resulting in death(or in injury) and minor offences in the same manner as anti-social criminal offences are handled. Physicians need to be treated the same as any other professions. At the same time, they are engaged in administering medical treatment to patients in the face of great risks as professionals. Under the circumstances, a discussion on the introduction of a more specific and empirical system is needed by considering the intrinsic characteristics of medical treatment and the need for an equitable health and medical policy. Accordingly, based on the above judgment and perception, this study explores the code of ethics for physicians and medical license revocation related to criminal offences at home and abroad, and examines various legislative alternatives appropriate for the Republic of Korea. In doing so, the purpose of the study is to contribute to the development of a reasonable system for handling criminal offences by physicians.

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.221
• /
• pp.116-129
• /
• 2011

환경부는 생산자책임재활용제도(EPR)의 성공적 운영을 위해 의무생산자의 재활용의무이행방법(직접, 개별위탁, 공제조합)을 개선하고 재활용 이행에 있어 회수 의무를 분명히 하며 재활용사업공제조합을 복수화하되 소규모 조합 난립을 막기 위해 조합 인가 및 취소 요건을 규정하고 포장재 분야 공제조합은 통합하는 등 조합 설립형태를 합리적으로 개선하고 재활용지원금 차등지원 근거 마련 등 조합 운영방식을 효율적으로 개선하려는 취지 아래 자원의 절약과 재활용 촉진에 관한 법률을 일부 개정했다. 이번 개정안에서는 또한 그 밖에 현행 제도 운영과정에서 나타난 미비점을 개선 보완하고자 했다. 본 고에서는 주요 내용 및 변경된 법안을 살펴보도록 한다.

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.222
• /
• pp.110-121
• /
• 2011

환경부는 생산자책임재활용제도(EPR)의 성공적 운영을 위해 의무생산자의 재활용의무이행방법(직접, 개별위탁, 공제조합)을 개선하고 재활용 이행에 있어 회수 의무를 분명히 하며 재활용사업공제조합을 복수화하되 소규모 조합 난립을 막기 위해 조합 인가 및 취소 요건을 규정하고 포장재 분야 공제조합은 통합하는 등 조합 설립형태를 합리적으로 개선하고 재활용지원금 차등지원 근거 마련 등 조합 운영방식을 효율적으로 개선하려는 취지 아래 자원의 절약과 재활용 촉진에 관한 법률을 일부 개정했다. 이번 개정안에서는 또한 그 밖에 현행 제도 운영과정에서 나타난 미비점을 개선 보완하고자 했다. 본 고에서는 주요 내용 및 변경된 법안을 살펴보도록 한다.