• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.251-268
• /
• 2024

In the Fourth Industrial Revolution era, global powers are enhancing R&D support to leverage innovations like AI, IoT, and big data for productivity gains and structural economic and social reforms. Yet, the declining R&D budget growth rate and the forecasted sharp cut in South Korea's R&D budget in 2024 highlight the critical need for national R&D performance management system discussions. Diverging from previous studies focused on quantitative analysis of performance determinants, this research utilizes fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA) to explore the interplay of factors affecting research institutions' outcomes comprehensively. Analyzing data from 2018 to 2022, it examines three outcome types of research institutions, identifying factor combinations crucial for success. By pinpointing these factors' configurations, the study offers institution-specific performance enhancement guidelines and insights for national R&D policy management and performance evaluation efficiency.

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• s.68
• /
• pp.20-21
• /
• 2005

1992년 발족한 정보통신연구진흥원은 정보통신 분야의 기술개발과 인력양성, 연구기반조성 및 정보화촉진기금을 운용∙관리하는 연구기관이다. 정보통신부가 마련한 벤처기업 지원정책들을 실행하는 주체로 다양한 출연사업과 융자사업을 통해 중소∙벤처기업을 지원하고 있다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.1087-1116
• /
• 2005

This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRI). Research methodology is as follows: first, four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton (1992) Balanced Scorecard Model are revised into six perspectives suitable to GRI's characteristics. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI evaluation groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRI's evaluatees are asked to allocate ideal weights on the performance measures. The evaluatees' weights are compared with the weights of current performance measures, and the characteristics of evaluatees' opinions about current performance evaluation systems are analyzed. Results are as follows; first, six perspectives for Korean GRIs are financial, long-term outcome, short-term outcome, strategic direction, project management, human resources perspectives. second, GRI evaluation systems put the most weights on the long- and short-term outcome perspectives and the least weights on the financial perspective. This result complies with theoretical model: in performance evaluation of GRIs, the customer perspective is the most important one while the financial perspective is the least important one. Third, evaluatees think that the long-term outcome perspective of the Basic-technology GRI group and the short-term outcome perspective of the Applied-technology GRI Group needs more weight. Fourth, it is found that the current systems have more weights on the project management and strategic direction perspectives than evaluatees think. The possible explanation of this result would be that since the measures of these perspectives are relatively easier to set up than those of other perspectives, the current systems contains larger number of measures and, accordingly more weights.

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.5 no.2 s.71
• /
• pp.4-42
• /
• 1995

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.2 no.19 s.19
• /
• pp.18-23
• /
• 1992

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.2 no.19 s.19
• /
• pp.12-17
• /
• 1992

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.151-163
• /
• 2015

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2014.10a
• /
• pp.303-315
• /
• 2014

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.12 no.6 s.138
• /
• pp.2-11
• /
• 2002

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.9 no.3 s.120
• /
• pp.48-62
• /
• 1999