• The Journal of Korean Medical History
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.62-67
• /
• 2007

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.260-273
• /
• 2006

본과제종림상실천각도탐토료장우화자혈법대후세의학적영향(本課題從臨床實踐角度探討了張于和刺血法對後世醫學的影響). 문중나열종원(文中羅列從元), 명(明), 청지현대적19위의가용자혈법치료질병적경험, 무론종병종(無論從病種), 병위(病位), 용혈화침자공구방면(用穴和針刺工具方面), 재장자화기초상도유료흔대발전. 특별시재외과화후과방면(特別是在外科和喉科方面), 경시풍부다채, 현시료차료법적생명력(顯示了此療法的生命力). 통과본과제적연구득출여하결론(通過本科題的硏究得出如下結論). 장자화재외과천장취환부방혈(張子和在外科擅長取患部放血), 경원(經元), 명(明), 청(淸), 연용도금천(沿用到今天), 시장씨영향력적최대증명(是張氏影響力的最大證明). 기차(其次), 장자화지후적명대(張子和之後的明代), 외과운용자혈법적병종대증(外科運用刺血法的病種大增), 포괄정창, 시독(時毒), 발배(發背), 뇌저(腦疽), 투침지, 오양, 연진창(緣唇瘡), 역양등, 발전료장씨지학(發展了張氏之學). 우기재후과(尤其在喉科), 출현계승여발전적명현궤적(出現繼承與發展的明顯軌跡), 장자화용소상(張子和用少商), 환부치후비(患部治喉痺), 지명대증가십의(至明代增加十宜), 삼상(三商), 청대증가곡지, 위중(委中), 양교(陽交), 간사(間使), 대릉(大陵), 도현대칙재증가이혈(到現代則再增加耳穴), 대추(大椎), 천계등(天桂等).

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.18 no.3 s.30
• /
• pp.55-69
• /
• 2005

소문령추류찬약주시대청대왕묘소저내경적주석서(素問靈樞類纂約註是對淸代汪昴所著內經的注釋書), 경과대차서적연구득출이하결론(經過對此書的硏究得出以下結論): 소문령추류찬약주대과거착오적주석내용진행료수정(素問靈樞類纂約註對過去錯誤的注釋內容進行了修正), 노력사내경지원의적용어임상(努力使內經之原意適用於臨床), 차대기초이론급임상적발전대래료흔대영향. 소문영추류찬약주중(素問靈樞類纂約註中)‘목위심규(目爲心竅)’주장(主張), 시여이시진적(是與李時珍的)‘뇌위원신지부(腦爲元神之府)’화주앙적(和注昻的)‘인지기성재어뇌(人之記性在於腦)’적기술일양(的記述一樣), 도시대청대관어뇌적이론지발양중매출적제일보(都是對淸代關於腦的理論之發揚中邁出的第一步), 대한의학중완선뇌적이론작출료거대적공헌(對韓醫學中完善腦的理論作出了巨大的貢獻). 재설명운기학설적항해승제론적동시(在說明運氣學說的亢害承制論的同時), 환주장생극관계시운기학적근본내용(還主張生剋關係是運氣學的根本內容), 기제우화시차조오운지리조화인류여육기적련계(旣制又化是借助五運之理調和人類與六氣的聯係), 인차주장차위고성인재저작경전중연구화여육적동기(因此主張此爲古聖人在著作經典中硏究化與育的動機), 성료정개운기학설적요점혹중심내용(成了整個運氣學說的要點或中心內容). 대난해적자사혹경구적주해중적난점(對難解的字詞或經句的註解中的難點), 통과종합인용불가(通過綜合引用佛家), 유가(儒家), 도가등사상진행료설명(道家等思想進行了說明), 종이사지능유지료기객관성(從而使之能維持了其客觀性).

• Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.33-61
• /
• 2003

This paper was written in order to study the correlation of Taeumin's symptomatic phamacology to Chinese Febrile medicine. Through the symptoms and Clinical cases, treatments of the epidemic febrile disease in ${\ulcorner}Dongyi$ Suse $Bowon\{lrcorner}$ , the symptomatic phamacology for Taeumin was compared with chinese febrile medicine. The following conclusions were reached as a result of comparing the epidemic febrile disease in Taeumin with Chinese febrile medicine. 1. The concept of the epidemic febrile disease in Chinese febrile medicine is wider than that of the epidemic febrile disease in ${\ulcorner}Dongyi$ Suse $Bowon\{lrcorner}$ 2. The cause of the epidemic febrile disease in Chinese febrile medicine is fevershiness almost, but the So-byung(An Natural-Ordinary Disease) of Taeumin in ${\ulcorner}Dongyi$ Suse $Bowon\{lrcorner}$ is the basic method to diagnose the symptom of the epidemic febrile disease. 3. The So-byung of Taeumin in ${\ulcorner}Dongyi$ Suse $Bowon\{lrcorner}$ is divided into feverish symptom and cold symptom according to the so-byung. 4. In ${\ulcorner}Dongyi$ Suse $Bowon\{lrcorner}$, The method of a curative means is based on differing dimensions of the Visera and bowels, but Chinese Febrile Medicine has a equal curative means irrelevant to a patient's character.

• The Journal of Dong Guk Oriental Medicine
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.33-85
• /
• 1998

In order to find the characteristic medical methods of "BianZhengGiMun" by the author ChenShihTo, we have translated and analyzed the mentioned book. Upon analyses, the following facts were noted : 1) "BianZhengGiMun" is written and composed of case studies. Prescriptive methods described here differ rather from previously known methods, where as our nation's Oriental medicine practitioners refer and consider these methods as miraculous modern methodologies. 2) Book's content has much similarities to "ShangHanLun"'s original text. Moreover, the content is adjusted towards presenting methodologies not coverd in "ShangHanLun"'s text, together with adding more information to conserve "ShangHanLun"'s methods as well as to critique them. 3) Diagnostic methods mainly follow the ZangFuBianZheng(臟腑辨證)'s pattern, where it's recorded information and theories are valid. 4) "BianZhengGiMun"'s proscriptive methods usually follow BuYinShengJin(補陰生津)'s form, where they were appropriate for that period and circumstances. 5) In consideration of all of the above factors, ChenShihTo grasped ShangHan and WenBing(acute febrile disease due to exogenous factor) as WaiGanReBing(外感熱病)'s double sided characteristics, where this corresponds with the current belief. It is believed that this in turn would provide much practical value to the present time.

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.146-183
• /
• 2000

통과이상적연구(通過以上的硏究), 장상한학술적성숙기(將傷寒學術的成熟期), 칙지명대여청대관여상한의학사적내용정리(則至明代與淸代關與傷寒醫學史的內容整理) 여하(如下). 1. 명청시대적시대배경사상한학적내용갱풍부(明淸時代的時代背景使傷寒學的內容更豊富), 촉진상한학술적발전(促進傷寒學術的發展) 병차출현료흔다관여상한적저작(幷且出現了?多關與傷寒的著作), 단실제상야출현료상한론내용적중복여지론술일반부분(但實際上也出現了傷寒論內容的重複與只論述一般部分), 혹저자립안조잡적처방지폐단(或著者立案粗雜的處方之弊端). 차기우출현각종상한학파적리유(此期又出現各種傷寒學派的理由), 시인위당시류행적사조(是因爲當時流行的思潮), 칙정주리학적영향여명대문단부고(則程朱理學的影響與明代文壇復古), 의고적추향(擬古的趨向), 환유금원시대적백가쟁오등(還有金元時代的百家爭嗚等), 성료형성상한학파적기초(成了形成傷寒學派的基礎). 2. 위료불실거상한론적본래의식(爲了不失去傷寒論的本來意識), 주장정리화고정원문회부왕숙화이전모양적착간중정파시왕안도기료개단(主張整理和考訂原文恢復王叔和以前模樣的錯簡重訂派是王安道起了開端), 방유집확대료기의식(方有執擴大了其意識). 유창여침명종시대표저학파학자(喩昌與沈明宗是代表這學派學者), 장로(張?) 정응모(程應?) 주양준(周揚俊) 오겸등수료저학설(吳謙等隨了這學說). 3. 주장(主張)'존왕(尊王)(숙화(叔和))찬성(贊成)(무기(无己))'적유호구론파(的維護舊論派), 주장료불능수변개상한론삼음삼양편적배렬여순서(主張了不能隨變改傷寒論三陰三陽篇的排列與順序), 문자(文字), 구문(句文), 문장(文章), 고세식(高世?), 진념조등인(陳念祖等人). 4. 주장상한론적정수재어변증론치(主張傷寒論的精髓在於辨證論治), 선우운용칙능득상한핵심리론적학파시변증론치학파(善于運用則能得傷寒核心理論的學派是辨證論治學派). 저학파분사개계통(這學派分四?系統), 이처방수집증상적의가유허굉(以處方收集證狀的醫家有許宏), 가금(柯琴), 서대춘(徐大椿); 이치법수집증상적의가유오인구(以治法收集證狀的醫家有吳人駒), 우이(尤怡); 이분유륙경찰증상적의가유진념조(以分有六經察證狀的醫家有陳念祖), 포성(包誠); 이증상분류증후적의가유류순(以證狀分類證候的醫家有劉純), 왕긍당(王肯堂), 진지정(秦之楨), 침금오등인(沈金鰲等人). 5. 회통파유량종류형(?通派有兩種類型), 일시수통상한여온병적학파(一是誰通傷寒與溫病的學派), 간칭회통파(簡稱?通派), 대표의가유도화(代表醫家有陶華), 오정(吳貞), 유근초등인(兪根初等人), 령일개유회통중의여서의적립장상해석상한적의가당종해(?一?有?通中醫與西醫的立場上解釋傷寒的醫家唐宗海). 6. 경전학파시이상한론위보귀적경전래인식(經典學派是以傷寒論爲保貴的經典來認識), 병차지유숭상차경여사상적학파(幷且持有崇尙此經與思想的學派), 차리분량개편우원문적고증래연구적경전고증파(此里分兩?偏于原文的考證來硏究的經典考證派), 화인위지유상한론(和認爲只有傷寒論), 재능총괄치료외감병(才能總括治療外感病), 부정온병학설병배척적경전림상파(否定溫病學說幷排斥的經典臨床派).