• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.131
• /
• pp.2-31
• /
• 2007

경쟁당국의 집행을 보완하고 피해자 구제를 위하여 금지청구권의 도입과 그 입법시 남소 방지를 위하여 금지청구권의 행사요건을 강화하되, 금지청구의 대상에 대하여는 제한하지 않을 것 등을 제시하고자 한다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.77-107
• /
• 2019

This study aims to analyze the current state of the operation of the information disclosure system in the judiciary of Korea to identify problems and suggest ways to provide more effective and substantive requests for information disclosure in the future. To this end, we reviewed the court's information disclosure claims process from 2007 to 2017 using the data published in the judicial yearbook and the data charged to the court information disclosure system of Korea. Results showed the different processes according to the person in charge, the high withdrawal rate, the complaint response rate, and the trend of the information nonexistence as the common problems. To solve these issues, we proposed to improve the various claims system, strengthen the education of the information disclosure claimant, publish the manual, and expand the provision and original text of information in advance.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.35 no.5
• /
• pp.78-82
• /
• 2010

• 발명특허
• /
• v.13 no.8 s.150
• /
• pp.52-54
• /
• 1988

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.13 no.5
• /
• pp.77-84
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to provide basic data necessary for preparing a sustainable health insurance system in the future by analyzing the difference in the results of claims according to the claims status of health insurance of dental medical institutions and the level of health insurance knowledge. In this study, a self-written online questionnaire was conducted for dental medical institutions 209 workers from March to May 2019. As a result of the study, The demand for professional manpower according to claim satisfaction was statistically significant in the qualification requirements (p<.05). Therefore, the necessity of professional workers for dental health insurance claims was confirmed and policies for this should be prepared.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.35 no.6
• /
• pp.80-86
• /
• 2010

• Patent21
• /
• s.52
• /
• pp.18-23
• /
• 2003

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.35 no.2
• /
• pp.67-81
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study was to investigate lots of problems that the current tax appeal system has, which are becoming serious issues as tax appeal cases are recently increasing. Those problems include the unreasonable procedure and period of deliberation on tax appeal cases, permission of a same tax appeal by more than one governmental agencies and the compulsory transposition system of tax appeal cases. All of these problems should be rectified in order to ensure that the currently tax appeal system protect taxpayers' rights and interests effectively. According to the current tax appeal system, the period from the receipt of tax appeal cases to ruling on them is up to 90 days. This is unrealistic, so that period should be allowed to be extended if those cases about more complicated taxation or if they are even harder to be treated for any reason. At present, chief of Tax Tribunal has to unconditionally accept resolution from the meeting of tax judges and make a ruling accordingly because he has no right to reject that resolution. But now, it's time to establish legal grounds based on which the chief suggests the tax judges to reconsider their resolution if it is undoubtedly wrong. Currently, there's a relatively little acceptance of tax appeals from people who can't financially afford to designate a proxy for them. To solve this problem, lots of efforts to make socially recognized the necessity to relive those people's rights and interests and make widely known the Public Proxy of Tax Appeal System. The current tax appeal system allows the Board of Audit and Inspection to be an appealer. This means taxation may be deliberated on by more than one governmental agencies. It is so inefficient. Therefore, tax appeal by the board should be only about taxation that they found unacceptable by audit and inspection. Except for this, it is not allowed that the Board of Audit and Inspection file tax appeals that are, in turn, necessarily transported to the National Taxation. Esecially, the transposition should be a procedure that is occasionally taken. In sum, this study investigated problems with the current tax appeal system, and made suggestions about solutions that are not theoretical but practical.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.134
• /
• pp.16-27
• /
• 2007

부당공동행위 관련제도의 전반적인 변화과정에서 논란의 소지가 있는 과징금 및 손해배상제도에 대한 경제적.법리적 분석을 통하여 부당공동행위에 대한 실질적이고 합리적인 규제의 틀을 모색할 필요가 있다. 나아가 과징금부과처분에 대한 관련 취소청구소송사례들에서 나타난 재량권 남용과 일탈을 줄이기 위한 적절한 방안도 모색되어야 한다.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.142
• /
• pp.22-25
• /
• 2009