• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.142
• /
• pp.99-119
• /
• 2017

Buddhism tends to be accepted as an institutional religion. This is probably due to the historical background in which Buddhism has been accepted as a representative institutional religion along with Christianity since the mid-20th century. In particular, Buddhism is accepted as an institutional religion based on tradition. Buddhism is also accepted as philosophy. Even if the western philosophical background is embraced that defines philosophy as the pursuit of intellectual clarity and wisdom in life, Buddhism is deemed to be classified as a philosophy that allows for the possibility of philosophical criticism without unconditionally believing the truth that Gautama Buddha discovered. The possibility of Buddhism as philosophy like this is directly linked to the possibility of Buddhism for doing philosophy. Doing philosophy in Buddhism can be presented in three processes: keeping a distance from daily life, the observation and concentration based on the distance, and the formation of a new world-view. Doing philosophy is rooted in the same way as meditation in the lives of people tired from post-capitalist everyday life. Nonetheless, Buddhism clearly has the characteristics of religion, thus posing a challenge of establishing a new relationship between religion and philosophy. The tradition of a strict separation between the religion and philosophy in Christian civilization is still working as a factor that keeps Buddhism from being classified as philosophy. In cases where the pursuit of intellectual clarity and practical wisdom in life is incorporated into the purpose of philosophy, Buddhism can be categorized into having the distinctive function of religion "spiritual peace", and sharing the common function of philosophy and religion "enlightenment." In that sense, it can also be an important task to seek a new perspective on the relationship between religion and philosophy.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.105
• /
• pp.27-47
• /
• 2008

불살생계를 제1계율로 내세우는 불교는 기본적으로 생명을 해치는 그 어떠한 행위도 용납하지 않는다. 따라서 원칙적인 입장에서는 사신(捨身) 행위에 해당하는 뇌사와 장기이식 등에 부정적인 입장을 견지한다. 그러나 현실적인 측면[적용의 융통주의]을 고려하면서도 본질적인 측면[원칙주의]을 간과하지 않는 불교의 자비와 중도주의적인 입장에 따른다면, 특수한 경우에 한해서 뇌사와 장기이식을 고려할 수도 있을 것이다. 즉 불교는 뇌사와 장기이식을 기본적으로 인정하지는 않지만, 자비의 원칙에 따라 어떤 상황에서는 엄격한 규제를 통한 제한적인 범위 내에서 뇌사와 장기이식을 허용할 수도 있다는 중도적인 입장을 취한다고 할 수 있다.

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2019

This study analyzed Korean representative ideology to establish a service philosophy. As a follow - up study of the service philosophy consistency study of the Korean original idea, we searched for the coherence as the philosophy of the service age in the Korean representative ideology. The basic structure and operation model of service philosophy are presented, and the service philosophy of major korean ideology is derived. The philosophy of service can be presented by the structure of service and the operation of service. The essential characteristics of the service are relationship, interactivity, horizontality, and harmony, and the service structure that reflects this is the coexistence of products and services. Based on the discussion on the structure and operation of the service philosophy, the service philosophy synthesis of Korean representative ideology is presented. From the Silla era to the Koryo dynasty, the essence of Korean Buddhism thought is in line with the service philosophy, and it was found that Toegye and Yulgok to Dasan's thoughts are also consistent with service philosophy. In the future, we need further studies to refine the structure and operational principles of the service philosophy and to develop it into a big idea. In addition, it is necessary to follow up the service philosophy of Oriental representative ideology centering on Chinese and Indian philosophy. Ultimately, it is necessary to establish a service philosophy as the main philosophical thought and to establish a service philosophy as a desirable future economic and social philosophy.

• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.50
• /
• pp.305-331
• /
• 2016

This article is a reflective study on the 'modern' and 'modernity' in 'Modern Buddhism of Korea' research discourse. First, we raise the issue on how to define and describe the 'modern' in the recent 'Modern Buddhism of Korea' research. We raise some questions about whether there is the concept of "modernity" properly explained and agreed in Buddhist academia of Korea. And we will try to propose its solution. Next, we will briefly review the characteristics of 'modern' and 'modernity' in the flow of history of the West, which have never been discussed in the research discourse of "Modern Buddhist studies of Korea.' We will raise questions about whether it is possible to find a 'modernity' in itself what it is, and is further expected really 'modern' or 'modernity' in Korean conditions on the basis of this review. Finally, this article seeks to reveal what premises must be kept in mind in the 'Modern Buddhist studies of Korea', by critically reviewing researches of "Modern Buddhist studies of Korea".

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.130
• /
• pp.363-380
• /
• 2014

유식불교에서 신(身)은 안 이 비 설 신 5근(根)을 갖춘 몸인 유근신(有根身)이며, 심(心)은 일단 의식을 일으키는 것, 즉 의식(意識)의 소의(所依)인 의근(意根)이다. 유식은 불교 본래의 무아론적 관점에 따라 의근은 개별적 사유 실체로서의 자아도 아니고, 그렇다고 5근과 마찬가지의 색법, 즉 물리적 심장이나 뇌일 수도 없으며, 나아가 이전 순간의 의식에 불과한 것도 아니라고 논한다. 따라서 유식은 의근을 제6의식과 구별되는 또 다른 식, 제7말나식(자아식)으로 간주한다. 그러나 유식에서 말나식은 실재하는 식이 아니라, 자신(자아)이 실재하지 않는다는 무아(無我)를 모르는 한, 존재하는 망상의 식, 비량(非量)의 식이다. 즉 말나식은 자신보다 더 심층의 식인 제8아뢰야식(일체 현상세계를 형성하는 근본식)의 활동을 알지 못하는 무명 불각(不覺)으로 인해, 자신을 그 세계 속 일부분인 유근신의 주체(자아)로 여기고 집착하는 식이다. 결국 유식에서 궁극의 심(心)은 견(見) 상(相)으로 이원화되기 전의 심층 아뢰야식이고, 개별적인 신(身)과 물리적 세계는 모두 그 아뢰야식의 변현 결과이다.

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2019

This study analyzed the service philosophy of Eastern mainstream thought in order to establish a service philosophy. Following a prior study the "study of the service philosophy of major korean ideology", we explored the service philosophy of the Eastern mainstream ideology of China and India and it's coherence. The existing basic structure and operational model of service philosophy were presented in depth and the service philosophy of Oriental mainstream thought was derived. The philosophy of service can be presented as an idea of the structure of the service and as an idea of the operation of the service. It suggested compatibility of the service philosophy of Asian mainstream ideas, and analyzed them mainly in China and India. Indian ideas revolved around the ancient philosophy of Veda, Upanishads philosophy, and representative Buddhist philosophy. It also showed that a major trend of mainstream ideas in China and India was found to be compatible with the service philosophy. Follow-up studies are needed to further refine the structure of service philosophy and develop the principles of operation into larger ideas in the future, and a study of conformity of service philosophy in representative Western ideas, focusing on Greek, Roman, and German philosophy, is also required. Ultimately, it is necessary to establish a service philosophy as an ideological base that drives future economic and social development.

• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.59
• /
• pp.241-260
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this paper is to explore Buddhist interpretation of Jeong Mong-joo, a Confucian scholar of the late Goryeo Dynasty. Buddhism in the latter part of the Goryeo Dynasty was no longer able to exercise the social purity of the national spirit and culture. In this situation, Neo-Confucian was gradually accepted. Thus, a change of ideology was made from Buddhism to Confucianism. Jeong Mong-joo's academic world was based on the fundamental scriptures of Confucianism. Jeong Mong-joo was especially well versed on the Book of Changes in the fundamental scriptures of Confucianism. Jeong Mong-joo emphasized the Book of Changes as the basis of the Buddhist interpretation. Jeong Mong-joo met the doctrines through various Buddhist scriptures. He was interested in Buddhism. There were not a few meetings and social gatherings with Buddhist monks. For this reason, Jeong Mong-joo cannot ignore his connection with Buddhism. On the other hand, Jeong Mong-joo is characterized by his understanding of Buddhism and his critical consciousness as Confucianist.

• 프린팅코리아
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.110-111
• /
• 2012

박종도(주)윤일문화 대표가 인쇄제작을 맡은 '한국철학사전'이 최근 발간됐다. 한국철학에 남다른 열정과 애정을 가지고 있는 박종도 대표는 인쇄사 사정이 어려운 와중에도 '한국철학사전' 발간을 중도에 포기하지 않고 진행했다. 한국철학사전은 2년 7개월에 걸쳐 민간신앙, 불교, 유교, 실학, 도교, 기독교를 망라하여 고대부터 현재까지의 주요 철학인물들과 핵심용어, 저술들을 총정리한 책이다. 이 책은 2011년 문화체육관광부 우수교양도서, 간행물윤리위원회 권장도서로 선정됐으며, 한겨레신문, 조선일보, 동아일보, SBS TV 등 주요 매체에서도 앞다퉈 소개하는 등 화제가 되고 있다. 본지에서는 이 책 발문에 쓰인 박종도 사장의 글을 소개한다.

• KLA journal
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.24-26
• /
• 1974

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.195
• /
• pp.5-5
• /
• 1996