• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2022.07a
• /
• pp.285-288
• /
• 2022

최근 코로나 확진자가 감소함에 따라 집합금지 명령이 해제되고 단계적 일상 회복이 진행되고 있다. 이에 맞춰 온라인 수업을 진행하던 학교들이 대면 수업으로 전환됨에 따라 학생들이 학교로 돌아오게 되었다. 하지만 학교에 처음 온 학생들은 학교 주변 상권에 대해 잘 모르는 경향이 있다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 학생들의 고민을 줄여주기 위하여 카테고리별로 맞춤 식당을 추천해주는 서비스 개발하였다. Kotlin을 활용한 안드로이드 애플리케이션 형태로 개발하였으며, 네이버 지도를 활용하여 식당의 위치를 알려주도록 하였다. 또한 Firebase를 활용한 게시판을 통해 소통의 창구를 마련하고 간단한 게임 등을 통해 학우들 간의 친밀도를 높일 수 있는 콘텐츠를 제공하였다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.139-207
• /
• 2022

As various state restrictions on individual freedom were imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns have been raised that excessive infringements on fundamental rights were indiscriminately permitted based on the public interest of preventing infectious diseases. Therefore, the question of how to set acceptable limits of liberty restrictions on individuals has emerged. However, since the phenomenon of infections spreading to the population is only predicted statistically, how to deal with the risk of the infected individual as a subject of legal analysis has become a problem. In the absence of a theoretical framework of legal analysis of risk, the risk of infected individuals during the pandemic was not analyzed strictly, and proportionality review of infection prevention measures was often only an abstract comparison of the importance of public interest and individual rights. Therefore, this research aims to conduct a theoretical review on how risk can be conceptualized legally in a public health crisis, and to develop a theoretical framework for proportionality review of the risk of liberty-limiting measures during a pandemic. Chapter 2 analyzes the legal philosophical concepts of risk, which are the basis for liberty restrictions during a public health crisis, and applies and extends them to the pandemic. Chapter 3 reviews previous studies related to liberty restriction measures in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and points out they have a limitation that specific criteria for the proportionality review of public health measures in the pandemic have not been presented. Accordingly, Chapter 3 specifies the methodological framework for proportionality review, referring to the theoretical discussion on risks in Chapter 2. Chapter 4 reviews the legitimacy of gathering restriction orders, applying the theoretical discussion in Chapter 2 and the criteria for proportionality review established in Chapter 3. In particular, Section 4 examines logic of proportionality review in judicial precedents over the ban on gathering restrictions implemented in the COVID-19 pandemic. In analyzing the precedents, the logic of proportionality review in each case is critically reviewed and reconstructed based on the theoretical framework presented in this research.